|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Taxmyth (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 06:41 AM Original message |
Did Obama really vote AGAINST keeping pedophiles in jail? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabbat hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 06:44 AM Response to Original message |
1. link n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
godai (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 06:52 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. The inflammatory title is of course false. Here's a link ot the facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 06:54 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Facts don't count. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxmyth (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:03 AM Response to Reply #2 |
8. ONLY State Senator to vote against keeping sex offenders in jail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
godai (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:06 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. So now you're certain but still no link n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxmyth (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:08 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Links are in original message |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 06:54 AM Response to Original message |
4. Did Clinton Kill Vincent Foster? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxmyth (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:12 AM Response to Reply #4 |
18. No proof she did, there is proof of Senator Obama's vote on this measure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:18 AM Response to Reply #18 |
24. There's only proof that you are a Freeper hack. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxmyth (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:21 AM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Text of Senate Bill and Votes are included |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:28 AM Response to Reply #27 |
37. And I posted the answer in my post downthread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Changenow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:43 AM Response to Reply #4 |
53. not as far as I know. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthpusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 06:57 AM Response to Original message |
5. OMFG - this truly is the very slime at the bottom of the barrle.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxmyth (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:07 AM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Bringing this up is wrong? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:11 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Yes it is. Why give our real enemies ammunition? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxmyth (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:14 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. It's not like this is unknown |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:25 AM Response to Reply #19 |
32. But you could not be bothered posting the simple explanation that I found in 2 sec, on google.com |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxmyth (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:29 AM Response to Reply #32 |
38. Neither could you, I see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:29 AM Response to Reply #38 |
41. I posted it twice in this thread. Here it is a third time, just for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TommyO (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 06:58 AM Response to Original message |
6. Provide proof, all you've done is post a spurious allegation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxmyth (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:06 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Edited original post to show Illinois Senate text |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TommyO (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 09:03 AM Response to Reply #10 |
61. OK, now why did he vote that way? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 06:59 AM Response to Original message |
7. Obama loves pedophiles. In fact, he's probably one himself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxmyth (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:05 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Text of the measure and votes cast now attached |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:08 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. You should be banned. You know that lawmakers can vote against a bill for a number of reasons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxmyth (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:09 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. But the ONLY lawmaker to vote against the measure? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:17 AM Response to Reply #15 |
21. The Bill was not Constitutional. Let me spell it out for you: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxmyth (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:27 AM Response to Reply #21 |
36. Your refutation is anything but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BadgerLaw2010 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:29 AM Response to Reply #21 |
39. How does that agree with "he hit the wrong button?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:18 AM Response to Reply #15 |
22. Google is your friend, if you are honest. This has been explained again and again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxmyth (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:39 AM Response to Reply #22 |
49. again, thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:39 AM Response to Reply #49 |
50. Thanks... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemVet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 08:20 AM Response to Reply #14 |
59. Banned? For pointing out someone's legislative record? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemVet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 08:19 AM Response to Reply #7 |
57. Please.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:10 AM Response to Original message |
16. I really wish you had not posted this- you do our party no good with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxmyth (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:20 AM Response to Reply #16 |
26. No Apologies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:23 AM Response to Reply #26 |
30. Good. Here is the explanation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:16 AM Response to Original message |
20. And the Illinois Senate record that year states he pressed the wrong button on this vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:20 AM Response to Reply #20 |
25. Thank you. But I promise this won't dissuade the OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxmyth (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:34 AM Original message |
Looked like a legitimate answer to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxmyth (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:34 AM Response to Reply #25 |
46. Looked like a legitimate answer to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:36 AM Response to Reply #46 |
48. Thank you. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
godai (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:24 AM Response to Reply #20 |
31. Thanks for the explanation. This was the same day as his mistaken vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
susankh4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:25 AM Response to Reply #20 |
35. This answer would have sufficed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxmyth (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:31 AM Response to Reply #20 |
43. Thank you for that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oleladylib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:57 AM Response to Reply #20 |
56. Pressing the wrong button could start World War III ...Comeon! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemVet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 08:22 AM Response to Reply #20 |
60. Heaven forbid he presses the wrong button as POTUS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
susankh4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:18 AM Response to Original message |
23. Apparently he had a reason for voting against.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:22 AM Response to Reply #23 |
28. He did answer it, but that won't prevent the kitchen sink from flying... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:22 AM Response to Original message |
29. I don't think this will go anywhere. Whatever his reason was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:25 AM Response to Reply #29 |
33. His vote was an accident...pressed the wrong vote button, but that won;t stop the gutter allegations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:29 AM Response to Reply #33 |
40. Thanks, myrna. I believe that his work on this issue is what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:35 AM Response to Reply #40 |
47. I find it specious that the OP would like us to believe that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxmyth (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:42 AM Response to Reply #47 |
51. Went with what I had read this AM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:46 AM Response to Reply #51 |
54. Thank you. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zodiak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:25 AM Response to Original message |
34. OMG! Obama is not "tough on crime"!!!!!1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:31 AM Response to Original message |
42. It's called the " County Jail Good Behavior Allowance Act". It singled out sex offenders as the ONLY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
godai (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:32 AM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Read #20 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BadgerLaw2010 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:34 AM Response to Reply #42 |
45. Interesting how many Obama supporters blindly defend a technical error Obama corrected. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:42 AM Response to Reply #45 |
52. Only sex offenders should have no chance at getting "good behavior" allowance? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JKaiser (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 07:52 AM Response to Original message |
55. Oh my.. Could this hurt him in the GE.. He sure has good judgement.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MojoMojoMojo (579 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 08:20 AM Response to Original message |
58. Was the gambling vote related to Rezko payoff? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC