Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pennsylvania, Part III

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 07:45 PM
Original message
Pennsylvania, Part III
Edited on Tue Apr-08-08 07:55 PM by FlyingSquirrel
Previous PA threads:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=5362965
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=5260310

Short & Sweet:

Squirrelly prediction as of 3/25: Clinton 51.4%, Obama 46.6% - Delegates, 83 vs 75
Squirrelly prediction as of 4/2: Clinton 50.7%, Obama 47.3% - Delegates, 82 vs 76
Squirrelly prediction as of 4/8: Clinton 51.2%, Obama 46.8% - Delegates, 82-3 vs 75-6


Poll ................................. Date .............. # polled ...... Clinton ..... Obama ... Undecided .. Difference

Rasmussen ........................... 4/7/08 ....... 730 LV .......... 48 .......... 43 ............. 9 .......... 5
SurveyUSA ............................ 4/5-7/08 ...... 597 LV ........... 56 .......... 38 ........... 2 ........... 18
ARG ..................................... 4/5-6/08 ........ 600 LV .......... 45 .......... 45 ............ 6 ........... 0
Quinnipiac .......................... 4/3-6/08 ..... 1340 LV ........... 50 .......... 44 ........... 6 ........... 6
InsiderAdvantage .................... 4/2/08 ......... 659 LV .......... 45 .......... 42 ........... 12 .......... 3
Muhlenberg ........................ 3/27-4/2/08 ..... 406 LV ........... 51 ........... 41 ........... 6 ......... 10
PPP (D) ........................... 3/31-4/1/08 ..... 1224 LV ........... 43 .......... 45 .......... 13 .......... -2
Rasmussen ..................... 3/31/2008 ...... 730 LV ........... 47 .......... 42 .......... 11 .......... 5
SurveyUSA ........................ 3/29-31/08 ...... LV ................. 53 .......... 41 ........... 2 ........... 12
Quinnipiac ...................... 3/24-31/08 ..... 1549 RV ........... 50 .......... 41 ........... 8 ........... 9
ARG ................................ 3/26-27/08 ........ 600 LV .......... 51 .......... 39 ............ 8 ........... 12
Rasmussen ..................... 3/24/2008 ...... 697 LV ........... 49 .......... 39 .......... 12 .......... 10
PPP (D) ............................. 3/15-16/08 ..... 597 LV ........... 56 .......... 30 .......... 14 .......... 26
Franklin & Marshall College .... 3/11-16/08 ..... 294 LV ........... 51 .......... 35 .......... 13 .......... 16
Quinnipiac ...................... 3/10-16/08 ..... 1304 LV .......... 53 .......... 41 ........... 6 ........... 12
Rasmussen ..................... 3/12/2008 ...... 697 LV ........... 51 .......... 38 ........... 11 .......... 13
SurveyUSA ......................... 3/8-10/08 ...... 608 LV ........... 55 .......... 36 ........... 3 ........... 19
Susquehanna ...................... 3/5-10/08 ...... 500 RV ........... 45 .......... 31 ........... 19 .......... 14
Strategic Vision (R) ............. 3/7-9/08 ......... LV ............... 56 .......... 38 ............ 6 ........... 18
ARG .................................. 3/7-8/08 ........ 600 LV .......... 52 .......... 41 ............ 6 ........... 11
Rasmussen ...................... 3/5/2008 ....... 690 LV .......... 52 .......... 37 ............ 11 .......... 15

For trend purposes, still not liking SurveyUSA or ARG. I'm adding Quinnipac in though because they've been doing polls in PA for a very long time and they switched back to "Likely Voters", and their numbers haven't been widely diverging from each other. Plus they have a very large sample group and have been doing semi-regular polls.

Rasmussen is a change from 15% gap to 5% gap in nearly 5 weeks. Quinnipac is a change from 12% gap to 6% gap in 3 weeks. In both cases Obama closes the gap by 2% per week. This is a reduction from last week's analysis of 3% per week, and returns to the previous week's estimate of 2%.

Current Pollster graph:



Pollster averages it out to 50.5% for Clinton, 42.7% for Obama with two weeks to go.

If Obama continues to close the gap by 2%, using the above numbers, the final result could be:

Clinton 50.9%, Obama 47.1%, giving Clinton and Obama each 1/2 of the undecideds and allowing for a 2% "Other" vote.

To be safe, I'll give Clinton 56% of the undecideds (I gave her 65% last time but I think that was excessive)

Final: Clinton 51.2%, Obama 46.8%

In other words, nearly back to the original prediction from March 25. We're essentially looking at 51% to 47% in PA. The difference will be in how many undecideds Obama can pull in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think it might be closer than that
particularly if any more "misspeaks" come from Clinton. Also if the unions are successful in making the Columbia/Penn connection a big story for the rank and file, that will bring it closer. This state, and particularly Philly, is a big union shop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not to mention that you aren't capturing
The 250,000 newly registered democrats. No one knows who these people are therefore they can't be called for polling purposes. Since Obama did the bigger voter registration drive I'll make a bold assumption that 2-1 they are for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. A valid point. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yep. That's why I've been wondering where they get their call lists...
Are they just randomly calling people? Or are they calling registered voters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Likely democratic voters
i.e. they purchase the list of registered democrats from the party and their voting history. All that information is available for them. The newly registered info won't be available to the campaigns till the after the election...so if the democratic campaigns can't get it...I doubt the pollsters can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Cool. I always wondered how they determined who was "likely".
Thanks for that info.

Yeah, knowing that, I'm not sure how much I trust these polls. On top of the new registrants, there are going to be lots of folks that haven't voted reliably who will come out for this election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Interesting
I didn't know this either. Thanks! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think things are going to be closer.
Don't get me wrong anything under 10 percent is GREAT! however, just too many things are going on that are swaying voters to Obama.

My guess is within 5 percent tho lets see what the polls say as we get closer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I tend to agree with you Zach
and if the op's prediction is close that only nets her 6 delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. And that is nowhere near enough for a firewall state.
Clinton seriously will need to net around 30-50 delegates to be serious about getting the supers to switch.

Seeing as that will not happen now and Obama will easily erase that gain later on. Clinton's chances continue to fade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Zach, correct
And to think Texas was suppose to be a firewall state. The battle cry was we need to win Ohio and Texas. Oophs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. The Takeaway: Hillary would lose 20% poll lead and would gain only 7-8 delegates
I think Obama is going to win PA by 2-3%, but since the delegate count is where the nominee is produced in the primary season, Obama's 1,639 would get 75 to Clinton's 1,503 getting 82 or so. Clinton gains barely nothing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChimpersMcSmirkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. Nice work... I think you're pretty close... ~5% eom
Edited on Tue Apr-08-08 08:28 PM by ChimpersMcSmirkers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. Big union stink here right now over the Penn "firing but not" ordeal
Teamsters pulling a road show.

Still 2 weeks to go....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
15. Two weeks is a lifetime in politics.
Fingers crossed.

Hey, thanks for this great compilation of data and analysis. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
16. A single digit loss? That's excellent for Obama (for PA). Schwing! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC