Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clark calls for 'New Progressive Era' in campaign finance reform.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:16 AM
Original message
Clark calls for 'New Progressive Era' in campaign finance reform.
I’m not beholden to any special interest," he told The Citizen. "I’m not a captive of any lobby group or special interest group. I don’t believe that money is healthy for American politics. I’m putting character and issue back in front."

He said he’s not worried about working with Congress despite his former ability to have his orders carried out.

"Congress is a political log-rolling process," he said. "With Congress it’s all about money." He said he believes the growing dependence on money in the political process puts democracy at risk.

"We need a new progressive era to reform political campaigning," he said, and said he would form a non-legislative commission to develop campaign finance reform.


http://www4.citizen.com/news2003/December2003/December_18/pol_clark_12.18.03a.asp

In a system where people can donate across party lines to interfere with primaries, and shadowy groups are formed to run attack ads because of donation limits, this is the right call at the right time.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wasnt he a lobbyist?


nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. That's why he thinks this is the right thing to do n/t
Edited on Fri Dec-19-03 05:30 AM by SahaleArm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Do you have a statement to back that up?

Or is that your personal gut feeling?

He made a ton of money as a lobbyist and now all of a sudden he is against the system?

And you Clarkies call Dean a waffler? LOL!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Actually he made 1/2 his money doing lecture tours...
Edited on Fri Dec-19-03 05:34 AM by SahaleArm
but I guess it's better to make money from money...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. So you dont have an answer...


Thank you! I didnt think you did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. No need to reply to something that you haven't sourced n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. I was asking a simple question...


Has Clark explained how he can be the candidate for CFR when he was a prominent lobbyist?

Would you take this kind of double standard from Bush?

I didnt think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:48 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Clark was never a 'prominent lobbyist.'
Edited on Fri Dec-19-03 05:50 AM by BillyBunter
Either support this ludicrously inflated statement or drop it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Moot point - Bush didn't advocate campaign finance reform
Edited on Fri Dec-19-03 05:53 AM by SahaleArm
I am questioning the veracity of the following:

He made a ton of money as a lobbyist.

How much did he make as a lobbyist and how much is a ton?

He worked on the board of a few companies that had government contracts, by law he had to register as a lobbyist when talking to the government (as he was an employee of said private company).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:56 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Oh Lord...

By your standards, that is excactly what Cheney did!

I am pointing out the double standard, surely you see that.

Now I agree with what he is doing, I just question his sincerity.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. What Cheney did was collusive.
Edited on Fri Dec-19-03 06:06 AM by SahaleArm
You can of course claim hypocrisy and I can't argue, it is your opinion afterall. The difference is that Cheney was paying back his buddies in spades while Clark is advocating campaign finance reform, not giving a handout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
24. Hasn't outtsider *D hired lobyists for campaign ? And no, Clark wasn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. Excellent. CFR is the nation's #1 issue, after voting fraud of course
If we can only get past the voting fraud so that we can
attack CFR. Quite the uphill battle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. More intelligent stuff from Clark
Its hard for me come up with stuff I don't like from Clark. This sounds good, and most Americans can agree with the approach I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. Dean's campaign IS CFR.
Time to join the 21st century, General.

We've already figured out how to fight back regardless of the corporate whore written ground rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Ask Dean why universal healthcare is a non-starter...
Money, lobbies, and the insurance industry. Campaign finance reform is more than matching Republicans dollar-for-dollar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Getting elected is the first step.


All of these ideas mean jack shit if there is a Repub in office.

First things fist....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Then let me be the first to welcome you to the Clark campaign
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Im ABB all the way!


If Clark is the nominee, I will be there right alongside you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Same here, a little give-and-take through primaries is good n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Gotcha. I'm just happy that we figured out a stopgap solution.
Does it take a lobbyist to beat down lobbyists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:43 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. No just a little foresight on how to separate politics from money ;) n/t
Edited on Fri Dec-19-03 05:56 AM by SahaleArm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
23. Like the Clean Air Act,the Clear skies and Lying is good...
Sure it is, kiddies. W thought he's have to kill it in courts until *D showed up! He said it's against W - but is killing it FOR THE PRIMARIES! Is the 21 Century the doubletalk time? I thought that was..1984!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
18. I am with him on this. It is just as bad as ever what is going on
Course I really do not think what is put on TV makes me vote for or against any one. I just shut the ads off. When they start saying one is this or that I then turn that one on in my mind when it shows up. You have to have had 5 children and a husband that liked to tell you what you were doing wrong to beable to do that!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
25. What does Dean say on this...."send my campaign more money?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
26. Hypocricy
"I don’t believe that money is healthy for American politics."

"Except when I'm accepting it to lobby congress on behalf of companies that want the government's business in order to establish unprecedented surveillance dossiers on American citizens. But other than that, I condemn it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Mind Reader
I mean your ability to reach into Clark's mind is impressive. Since I can't read his mind I assumed he actually believed what he was doing was a good thing for our national security despite the scary spin job you put on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Fine
So, participating in the moneied influence on Wahsington is okay as long as Clark deems it worthy. That's still contradictory to his statements above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
returnable Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. Hypocrisy?
You mean like a candidate who says he's for CFR, except when it impedes his ability to outspend his opponents in a primary race?

Is that the hypocrisy you're talking about? :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC