|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 10:14 PM Original message |
Bill Richardson and energy policy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ossman (883 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
1. I guess the Clinton TEAM made a horrible choice, then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 10:29 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. That's why he didn't last long |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-24-08 12:21 AM Response to Reply #4 |
30. Richardson served from August 1998 to January 2001 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The_Casual_Observer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
2. He was more of a diplomat when it came to the oil companies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 10:37 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Why didn't he push for better energy policy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ossman (883 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 10:47 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Because Bill Clinton is a corporatist Democrat. Hillary less so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The_Casual_Observer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 10:53 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. What would that guy know about energy policies? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Umbram (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
3. Who was setting his policy agenda? Oh yea, Bill Clinton. Thanks for the reminder. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johnny__Motown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
5. Because Bill Clinton Didn't Have Renewable Energy As A Priority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
7. Richardson just craves attention. I don't think his endorsement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LordJFT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
8. I'm curious to know what you planned on posting about him if he endorsed Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 10:55 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. I was an early Edwards supporter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NanceGreggs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
10. I really regret that you think denigrating ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 11:03 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Do you have a link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NanceGreggs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 11:05 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Proving that my mailman is not a Hillary supporter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 11:13 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Proving your allegation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NanceGreggs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 11:22 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Take this in any which way you find palatable ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 11:30 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. The post was about Richardson's record on energy policy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NanceGreggs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 11:34 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. And Richardson's record on energy policy ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 11:38 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Anyone being considered for a cabinet position or VP spot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NanceGreggs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 11:51 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. I would agree with you ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-24-08 12:00 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Again you're making unfounded accusations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NanceGreggs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-24-08 12:18 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Whatever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 11:42 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. You do understand analogies and the hierarchies of cognitive thought? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 11:58 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. My powers of reasoning are more developed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-24-08 12:20 AM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Richardson's energy tenture however echoed Clinton's vision |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
13. Your mom should have held you more as a kid.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NanceGreggs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-24-08 12:45 AM Response to Reply #13 |
31. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EmperorHasNoClothes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
16. Why weren't you saying this BEFORE he endorsed Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-23-08 11:41 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. I've brought it up numerous times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-24-08 12:19 AM Response to Original message |
28. lol I guess the Clintons' like Corporatists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 08th 2024, 12:42 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC