Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

*CAN* Obama get to 2025 by the convention? Is it mathematically possible?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Mezzo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 07:31 PM
Original message
*CAN* Obama get to 2025 by the convention? Is it mathematically possible?
It seems like we're looking at a mathematical impossibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. If super delegates start flipping in large numbers perhaps
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Yeah, he can have more then 2025 delegates including SD's
but that's the only way. And the good thing about it is because he can't the 2024 delegates without SD's before the convention, Hillary can stay in the race all the way to Denver and she will because she is going to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sure.
As soon as the states finish voting, superdelegates are going to come out in force.

Could be sooner.

Oddly, this is a sort of version of the 50 state strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM7nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Neither can with pledged delegates only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nope. But neither can Hillary overcome his lead.
SO DROP OUT NOW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mezzo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Nope. His bigot pastor has sealed his fate, and you know it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. He's not a bigot. Just for your information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Nope. And no amount of spin is going to win this for Hillary. And you know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
27. The bigot pastor sealed Hillary's fate, too
Edited on Fri Mar-21-08 09:52 PM by rocknation
She's been trying to convince the superdelegates that Wright undermines Obama's electability without mentioning that she has a tie to Wright of her own. Not the way to score points--and it may have cost her points with Bill Richardson.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
28. I don't think he's a bigot
But I would say he is a racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
30. Jeremiah Wright could have a swastika tattoo on his forehead
and it wouldn't change Obama's lead in the pledged delegates or popular vote count. And the superdelegates, being spineless politicians when all is said and done, are not going to vote contrary to the popular vote. Doing that would put future elections at risk for them, and they're not going to take that risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Yes he can. With the help of superdelegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yes she can. With the help of superdelegates.
There's your conundrum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. You are right. But that looks unlikely at this point.
She is simply too far behind in the pledged delegate count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. What would be the basis of her getting superdelegates? Popular vote? Not likely.
Pledged delegate number? Impossible, apparently.

What would be the basis of the majority of superdelegates voting for her? Reminder: Superdelegates don't exist to name a nominee; they exist to clarify and streamline the process, throw more definitive support to the winner, or end a drawn out battle by supporting the obvious winner of the popular vote and pledged delegate vote but who isn't getting to the magic number.

So....there is no way the superdelegates can go for Clinton, unless they "throw" Obama out and "crown" the Clintons. This would split the party, and damage the party for years to come. I don't think the party will let that happen.

Are you seeing how it is, yet? This is just the way it is. Even if the superdelegates looooove the Clintons and want them to win, they cannot thwart the will of their voters and expect to win in November. Winning in November is the name of the game, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. The race is still quite close, no matter how many magic formulae are posted.
Depending on how the last 10 primaries go, the race can get tighter still.

I don't think superdelegates should exist at all but since they do this year, it is entirely appropriate for them to consider the ebb and flow of the entire season, which states were and were not won, which states are in play for the GE, and how each of them have withstood the increased scrutiny they're getting.

If Clinton enters with the greater momentum, and if it's still very close, it's not at all unreasonable that the supers would shift to her.

The bottom line is, neither of them has an undivided, inevitable claim on the party's nomination. Neither of them has yet earned it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Cutting his lead to 100 pledged delegates won't make it close, she lost. deal with it
better luck next time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. It already is close. Deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Actually, no it's not close. He is pretty far ahead. To catch up w/him, she'd have to win
EVERY primary left by a majority of 60% or so, if that gives you an idea of how far ahead.

She is lower in popular votes. She is much lower in pledged delegates. I think she may be somewhat higher in superdelegates, still. But she is trending downward in that regard.

I believe in supporting your candidate, but I also believe in realism. Like it or not, Clinton will not and cannot win w/o the superdelegates, and they simply will not vote for her unless she is already winning. The party leaders will prevent that from happening, because that would mean a loss in November (perceived unfairness by Obama supporters would split the party).

Obama is damaged from the Wright issue, but like it or not, he is apparently going to be the nominee, unless something else really big happens to his candidacy. But he would have to sink, or the party take him out. Clinton cannot win it on her own, fairly, by votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Not necessarily. Until FL and MI are solved you can't be certain of the delegate or popular vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Ah, yes. MI and FL. But that would have to be fair, whatever is done w/those states.
I can't imagine an outcome that everyone would think is fair. But I hope they come up with something.

Even so, getting most of those delegates won't bring her even close to Obama. He's pretty far ahead in pledged delegates. She'd still have to win every other primary from here on out, to catch up. And that won't happen, obviously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yes he can. With the help of superdelegates.
Provided he and Hillary split up half of the remaining pledged delegates each, he needs a little less than 50% of the remaining superdelegates to commit to him to win the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. Mathematically....yes
As of right now Obama needs about 398 delegates to reach 2024. With 566 remaining pledged delegates to allocate, winning 398 is obviously possible, but not likely. If Obama somehow wins Pennsylvania, Clinton may drop out, and with 408 delegates left Obama almost certainly would get 398 but then again he would get all the superdelegates anyway. It is quite conceivable that Obama could win in the range of 55% of remaining pledged delegates, especially if as the contest nears its end it seems more and more likely he will win. This would give him 311 more delegates, and he would just need 87 new superdelegates to reach 2024, about a quarter of the remaining superdelegates. Its hard to imagine Obama getting less than 1/4th of the superdelegates with the pledged delegate lead he would have in this situation, so unless very few superdelegates endorse between now and the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. B-b-b-but, if four fifths of the pledged and seven eighths of the governors and
Edited on Fri Mar-21-08 08:20 PM by Yossariant
twelve out of 16 Senators and six out of seven superdelegates and three out of five representatives ....

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. With Superdelegates, yes, easily
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
17. Yes (and the number is now 2024)
He only needs 407 Delegates there are 907 delegates left to either choose or sd to decide. He only needs 44% of those delegates to get the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
18. With a few superdelegates. Clinton would have a much tougher time of it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. It might occur after PA. Hillary will probably win PA but not by nearly enough
Edited on Fri Mar-21-08 09:04 PM by Quixote1818
to get people thinking she could come from behind and win. With PA in the past Clinton will have no other big state to point to to pull her out of her huge hole. At that point the National dialog will change to "Clinton can't win" and pressure will mount for her to drop out. The Supers should start to abandon her and move toward Obama to unify the party and Hillary will be forced to drop out at that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. Hillary's "magic number" is 65
Edited on Fri Mar-21-08 09:45 PM by rocknation
that's the MINIMUM percentage she'll have to score in ALL the remaining contests if she wants any chance of making a legitimate case with the superdelegates.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC