Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Richardson on Situation Room: Resents that Clinton Camp downplays his endorsement (VIDEO)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 04:19 PM
Original message
Richardson on Situation Room: Resents that Clinton Camp downplays his endorsement (VIDEO)
Edited on Fri Mar-21-08 04:20 PM by jefferson_dem
VIDEO ---> http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid1272136976/bclid1460782824/bctid1466820035

TRANSCRIPT --->

Transcript of Richardson on CNN Post-Endorsement

KING: Governor Bill Richardson joins us now from Portland, Oregon, after his big endorsement today.

Governor, thanks for joining us in THE SITUATION ROOM.

A big event for the Obama campaign today. They are highlighting this as proof that he is gaining Democrats of stature on his team. But you, yourself, were on this program just a couple of weeks ago with Wolf Blitzer, and you were asked about the possibility who you might endorse, and this is what you said.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

GOV. BILL RICHARDSON (D), NEW MEXICO: Quite frankly, I don’t feel, Wolf, that endorsements by politicians help each other.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

KING: You also went on to say, “I don’t consider myself that important.”

So, why should anyone look at this endorsement and say this matters?

RICHARDSON: Well, I still believe that one politician endorsing another doesn’t make that much difference. But Senator Obama had been talking to me pretty extensively since I got out of the race. So did Senator Clinton, who I deeply admire. And it reached the point when I felt that the campaign has gotten too negative.

Instead of unifying as a party, we’re kind of tearing each other apart.

We have to be ready in November for a very strong Republican candidate.

So I felt stepping in, taking a stand for Senator Obama, who I believe can bring us together, was the right step to do. And that’s what I’m doing, John.

KING: Do you believe Senator Clinton cannot bring the party together?

RICHARDSON: Well, I believe that she has every right to continue. She’s running a very good campaign. But I think that Senator Obama has something special, something that can bring internationally America’s prestige back, that can deal with the race issue as he did so eloquently last week, that can deal with the domestic issues in a bipartisan way.

And there’s something special about the guy that I found out during the campaign.

He’s a good, decent man with an enormous ability to inspire. I just saw thousands of people here in Oregon just hanging on to his every word, but with hope in their eyes, with excitement. I’ve never seen that before. There’s something special about this guy, and I want to be a part of it.

KING: Well, you say something special about this guy. You know, you were a cabinet member, you were an ambassador in the Bill Clinton administration. Bill Clinton flew out to spend Super Bowl Sunday with Bill Richardson, and you say it was just two old friends getting together. I see — we’ve got a photo of you up on the couch watching the ball game.

Look, the Clinton campaign said today, this is no big deal, this endorsement doesn’t matter. Mark Penn said that on a conference call.

But the former president of the United States came out to see you, they clearly wanted this endorsement. Bill Clinton put you in a cabinet position, gave you international profile, not just a high national profile.

Why not Senator Clinton? What is it about her that made you say no?

RICHARDSON: Well, I owe a lot to Senator Clinton and to President Clinton, to the Clinton family. But I served well. I paid it back in service to the country.

President Clinton is a good friend. And we have been good friends.

It was very difficult for me to make this decision. It was a painful conversation for me that I had with Senator Clinton last night. But, you know, I believe that my personal feelings, I did run against Senator Clinton and others for president. I feel that you’ve got to get beyond those personal issues and do what you think is best for the country.

But it was painful, John. It wasn’t easy. I do believe she can be…

KING: I don’t want to interrupt, but you say it was painful and it wasn’t easy. I’ve spoken to some others who have had that same conversation, and they say at the end it’s not all that pleasant.

Take us inside a bit of that conversation.

RICHARDSON: Well, let’s say it was a difficult conversation. But, you know, I resent the fact that the Clinton people are now saying that my endorsement is too late because I only can help with Texans — with Texas and Hispanics, implying that that’s my only value.

You know, that’s typical of some of his advisers that kind of turned me off. And I see a positive thrust by Senator Obama and his people and want to bring the country together.

But I have enormous respect for the Clintons. If she’s the nominee, I’ll fight very hard for her. But this was a personal decision that I felt had to go beyond personal feelings and loyalties and what’s good for the country.

KING: As you know, back when you were in the race, one of your early ads was a humorous ad, but it was meant to deliver a powerful statement. It was the resume ad. You were sitting across the table, essentially saying, I’m a governor, I’ve been an ambassador, I’ve been a cabinet secretary, I’ve been in the Congress, I’ve been around the world dealing with these hotspots and hostage negotiations and the like.

You billed yourself as the most experienced candidate in the race. Today you’re endorsing a man that many would say is the least experienced candidate in this race.

How can you make up that gap, if you will?

RICHARDSON: Well, clearly, I believe that Senator Obama is the best person to bring this country together and to restore our strength internationally. He has great judgment.

He does have a solid legislative experience in the U.S. Senate. He does have exceptional judgment. I mean, his decision on Iraq, the fact that he saw this as a real abyss, makes a lot of sense.

But I’ve gotten to know the guy — his values, his intelligence at debates, his humanity. And I just believe that there’s something special about the guy to bring the country together that the country needs now.

Clearly, my message of experience wasn’t working. I tried to say that I’d bring change with my experience, but the public, the American people, want change, and they want something new and different that somebody — that can inspire them. And they’re seeing this in Senator Obama. And I’m seeing it, too, and so this is why I endorsed him.

KING: If you look at the polling right now, Governor Richardson, it’s clear the American people want the troops out of Iraq, they want the war over. Yet, when you them the question, who is best able to handle Iraq?

John McCain beats Obama and Clinton by a significant margin, which leads most to believe the American people, even though they disagree with McCain on the war, have decided he has the better experience, the better judgment to be commander in chief.

Do you have any worry that Senator Obama, if he is the nominee, that the “He needs on-the-job training, I don’t” argument would work?

RICHARDSON: Well, what you need in a commander in chief first is values.

And Senator Obama has that.

Secondly, you need good judgment. And he has that.

Third, you need to surround yourself with good people and have contingency plans on what you’re going to do if there’s a crisis affecting Americans’ national security.

On all those fronts, he scores extremely well. And perhaps the most important one, he can inspire and bring the country together internationally at a time of crisis to tackle our global challenges.

We don’t have that. So I see him as a very viable commander in chief who has excellent judgment and would surround himself with some very good people.

KING: Any discussions that one of those good people might be Bill Richardson if Barack Obama wins the nomination?

RICHARDSON: No. You know, John, I love being governor of New Mexico and growing my beard, and, you know, riding my horse. So I’m going to work very hard for him to get him elected.

KING: Next time we do the interview it will be on a horse.

Governor, thanks so much for joining us today.

RICHARDSON: Thank you.

http://thepage.time.com/transcript-of-richardson-on-cnn-post-endorsement/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Welcome to "not counting" Gov. Richardson. Ain't it grand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. I really wonder what was said in that phone conversation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Besides, the Ides of March were LAST week.
Those KKKlint00ns are such ingrates!

They OWE Richardson!

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Actually, it's ClintonInc that's now finding out nobody owes them shit.
Payback is a bitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. That's what I just said.
How DARE she get in the way of Obama?

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. You sure do live that little tag line of yours
You embody petulance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Why, Pot! It's you, after all!
--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Well then...
Edited on Fri Mar-21-08 04:38 PM by jefferson_dem
We agree.

It's time Hillary wakes up and realizes the "her turn" shit was just a egocentric fantasy. It's time to unite, for the good of the Party and the nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. And where did the "her turn shit" come from, anyway?
Team Obama.

It's a talking point, crafted by David Axelrod and approved by Barack Obama himself.

And you believe it.

For the good of the party, I suppose.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Is there a bridge they're not willing to burn?
Signs point to No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tokenlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. the bridge to the 21st century?? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yep, "Richardson is too late" = his value is only in states with many Hispanics.
And I kinda find that offensive. I'm not surprised he's turned off as well.

PS - He waited this long out of respect for Clinton. Too bad, the same respect isn't shown here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damndude Donating Member (306 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. is it just me
or did the fact that he confirmed this not speak to the fact that even among their own 'friends' they decided to pursue a race based strategy. he was no longer useful in the racial demographic they were pursuing so he doesn't matter as a delegate, a political figure or person able persuade undecideds. a moronic idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. The Clintons threw Richardson under the bus.
They should be ashamed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. you win some you lose some, but you don't have to make them so mad they won't come back
:banghead:

RICHARDSON: Well, let’s say it was a difficult conversation. But, you know, I resent the fact that the Clinton people are now saying that my endorsement is too late because I only can help with Texans — with Texas and Hispanics, implying that that’s my only value.

You know, that’s typical of some of his advisers that kind of turned me off. And I see a positive thrust by Senator Obama and his people and want to bring the country together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. Silly ClintonInc. They lobbied Richardson for this meaningless endorsement a week ago.
Bill and Hillary both called Richardson to ask for his endorsement March 18 — eight days ago, according to a source familiar with the conversations.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0308/Seeking_then_downplaying_Richardsons_endorsement.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. Thanks for the transcript!
I just read on Politico (and thanks to whomever provided that link) that the Clintons each spoke with Richardson a few days ago, asking for his endorsement. One of the responses put it well regarding Mark Penn: He just could have said they were disappointed and would have loved to have had BR's endorsement, and think very highly of him and what he's done for our country. But Penn, as usual, has to be dismissive of anyone/thing that doesn't support HRC.

A question. It was mentioned in the responses that a few days ago Richardson said he felt the Super Delegates should cast their vote for whomever the people of their State preferred. Since Clinton won in Richardson's state:

1. Is his endorsement of Obama technically a vote for him?

2. Could he conceivably endorse Obama and cast his SD for Hillary since that's who won his State?

3. If he DOES cast his SD vote for Obama, what do you think the reaction of his constituents would be?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. thanks for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. Gov. Richardson is was a good friend of the Clinton's.
And he left them. Makes you think if he can do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. It's a strange, strange event.
Given that the "unity candidate", the man who will supposedly transform us and our politics, has employed some of the most viscious backstabbing in Democratic history, destroyed (by gossip) two of the best Democratic politicians we've ever had, recruited tens of thousands of internetters to poison the well of public discourse, and run his entire campaign like a rock opera, I think we are on entirely new terrain here.

And I don't buy the god-man mythos, that Obama is the avatar of some higher power. He's a politician. He used to be a good one.

What goes around, comes around. That has been said about the Clintons with such glee that I really do wonder what kind of karma will be visited upon Obama and his legion.

What do I hope? I hope this is all an historical aberration, and that after it shakes out, we will get to the business of re-establishing solidarity and rationality. Or maybe I've been reading DU too much today.

--p!
Meanwhile -- John McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Obama will get his in November when too many of Hillary's supporters
will not vote for him. As for Richardson, one word for him: traidor!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC