Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Draft Gore or McCain will be the president

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
thesubstanceofdreams Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:24 PM
Original message
Draft Gore or McCain will be the president

Obama is too good of a candidate for the average uninformed and gullible American voter. Hillary never had a realistic chance. And instead of at least fighting the fight together, the democratic candidates have been tearing each other down and it doesn't look like it's going to stop.

At least the repugs nominated McWar, because at this point even Huckabee would win the GE.

And now I leave before I receive the pile of hate that EVERY post in GD/P seems to generate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LuvMyPorsche Donating Member (121 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gore
or General Clark would be better choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thank you for posting this!
I'm thinking along the same lines you are. Both Clinton and Obama are wearing each other out--while the GOP plots and plans how to defame both of them. Gore has been above the fray and is a respected Democrat, and one the GOP is really ignoring right now. If this goes to convention, I hope they draft Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. I disagree on your premise that obama is "too good"
quite the contrary.
However...I will agree that the viability of BOTH candidates should be called into question and yes...I would fully support AL Gore as the Next President of the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Are you dreaming or is there some way we could really get Gore to run? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. The economy is going belly up.
There is just no way the public elects McSame when they are blaming Reps for getting us into this mess.

Gore obviously doesn't want the job of President now or he would have been running this year.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Gore didn't run because Hillary and Obama put their names in first.
And he realized he would have a hard time winning against such a field.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. I believe that Gore would have had the nom handed to him
on a silver platter if he had wanted it.
He obviously had his reasons to not join the race. I really wish he had. It's the country loss to not have such an intelligent thoughtful man as President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Over Hillary Clinton?
Nobody was talking about Al Gore in December 2004 after Kerry lost the election. They were all talking about Hillary Clinton in 2008.

Against the Clinton machine, I don't blame Gore for not running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Deadlocked convention, our only salvation.
Re-Elect Al Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. Draft Gore and McCain WILL be the President
you don't pick a nominee with no money and no campaign organization 8-9 weeks before the election. It's absurd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
publicatlarge Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Sure you can. With 8 or 9 weeks to campaign...
..you wouldn't need as much money. Gore has total name recognition and is infinitely qualified. Gore at the top of the ticket would bring in a landslide.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. ridiculous. I wouldn't vote for him and I doubt I'm alone
abrogating the votes of millions, disenfranchising them, is NOT a progressive value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. I agee. No one is better qualified right now for the job. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. That's incredibly naive
He'd still be getting phone lines put in in his state offices on election day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yes that would be great.
We already have two candidates whose supporters believe is having the election stolen from them. Let's have a convention where we tick everyone off and just pick a name out of the blue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
publicatlarge Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Thing is - what is going on now is not an election.
The party primaries select delegates to the party convention. Once there the delegates choose a nominee. Nothing is pre-determined, and should not be. August in Denver may bring in more issues than we can know now.

Brokered Convention.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. IF the convention is deadlocked and IF neither candidate will withdraw - - them's the rules
Folks need to get familiar with the convention process and rules, because there is the possibility - - not a probability - - that the convention will have to choose a nominee at the convention who did not run in the primaries.

The only way to win the nomination is to have the magic number of delegates: 2,025. Neither Obama nor Clinton can reach this number based on their pledged delegates and the number of remaining delegates to pledge. Super delegates can remain undeclared if they want. So there is the possibility - - not probability - - that we will get to the convention and neither candidate will have won the magic number of delegates (super delegates and vanilla delegates) to win the nomination on the first ballot.

Neither will win the nomination just because they have the most pledged delegates or the highest popular vote total - - them just ain't the rules. There are only two paths for them to win now: by either convincing enough super delegates to back them before the convention starts (note to the Obama supporters who have been trashing this process: this is the only way Obama can win the nomination before the convention) - - OR by having a floor fight at the convention after the first vote.

If neither candidate receives the magic number of delegates on the first vote, the rules say that the delegates - - super and vanilla - - can vote for anybody they think will be the best nominee. The convention is supposed to vote and vote and vote until somebody reaches the magic number of delegates and becomes the nominee. Them's the rules.

IF, after voting and voting and voting and voting and voting, neither candidate is able convince the magic number of delegates to vote for them - - and IF neither candidate will drop out or accept the VP slot on the other's ticket, the convention is deadlocked. The convention will then look for other potential nominees and vote on whether they should become the nominee. If that new potential nominee can can get 2,025 delegates to vote for them, that new person is the nominee. Them's the rules. The alternative is we run nobody, which wouldn't just loose us the White House, it would be disastrous on down ticket races.

And the nomination would not have been stolen in this instance - - because the only way this scenario will actually happen is if neither Obama nor Clinton can persuade 2,025 people to vote for them (kind of a necessary skill in a candidate for President) AND if both of them are equally pig headed about refusing to take the #2 slot.

The person who would probably have the easiest time getting a cold nomination from the floor is Al Gore, mostly because he has the most experience and the best chance of winning the Presidency even starting two years after the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl_interrupted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. AlGore-08.com.. thank you so much for this information!
Our present candidates should be beating Mc Cain handily..they are not. Since both Hillary & Obama camps are so bitterly divided, I don't see anyone being happy with either of them. Too bad, but that's how it is. They go crazy over even the possiblity of both on the same ticket. I'm tired of who's going to be "first". Sounds like a bad Abbott and Costello skit. As far as I'm concerned, Gore is the most qualified. Please, is there any possibility of this? How can we make this happen? Any info you can give me, is appreciated. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueManDude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not the Only One Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. No. We have to sack up and deal with this like grownups.
We can't just totally wipe out the pre-convention history, all the money raised and spent and the voters who stood in line and in rooms to vote in primaries and caucuses.

We have to make a decision on which of these two gets the job and then kiss and make up and move forward to November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
18. Draft Gore or Edwards or both!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moobu2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
19. Barack's already ruined any chance we had to take back the WH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. What a ridiculous uniformed opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zonkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
20. Instead of fretting, why can't you see this situation as a challenge for all of us, (even
the "gullible voter" you reference)to raise consciousness, to get out the vote, to s stay on (or get back to) message, to heal our primary wounds and move forward. We can do it. It was never going to be easy. I have faith in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
22. Sorry that's not the process.
besides, gore couldn't beat the stupidest man ever to run for the office, McCain would tear him to shreds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. Gore did beat Bush. Votes were reversed and stolen. Or, did you forget? plus
the media chose to belittle him and like good little sheeple we listened and believed what they said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
24. Geez...Are you suggesting we waste our time with our two finalists?
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 01:15 PM by chknltl
I am fond of wasting my time thank you. There are two many of us at this point who have pinned their hopes and dreams on Senator's Obama and Clinton. I may be fond of wasting my time but they are not! I hope that Al is offered a nice cabinet post in the Obama Administration...perhaps a new post, one which deals directly with Global Warming.
(edited for spell check)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
publicatlarge Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. This election is not a 'Survivors Show'.
It is watershed election - a turning point - to get this country back from the brink of disaster. Vision and leadership are what is needed, not hopes and dreams.

Al Gore would wipe McCain out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Too bad for Gore, and for you, he did not run
The Red Sox beat the Indians in the ALCS last year for the right to represent the AL in the World Series. Should the Yankees have been given the right to jump in instead, because some felt they would be a better team in the end?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. Al Gore COULD HAVE wiped mCcain out
At this point, I feel that Senator Obama would make a better President than Al Gore...so how am I supposed to somehow magically come to some understanding that Al Gore is better than Barrack? I am not the only one who feels that way. Have you not heard of the Obama surge? Are all those millions of Americans supposed to magically go: "Ooooh lookie here, someone better, c-ya later Barrack!"???

I am betting that you will find this same sentiment among the Clinton supporters as well. We may have to drag a few of them kicking and screaming over to the Obama camp at some point, they may have to do the same with some of us Obama supporters. Do you really believe that Al Gore is going to find this task any easier at this late stage?

Al Gore would have done well had he entered earlier on. There was a pretty strong movement to draft Gore in California...I do not know what they are doing these days. Perhaps you and others in this thread who are passionate about Al Gore magically changing his mind could go aid them...if they are still around.

btw I have every confidence that We The People will use our votes to wipe mCcaine out with Senator Obama come November. We would likely even do so with Senator Clinton. We The People, (read We The VAST MAJORITY of voters), want change. Nowhere-NOWHERE is mCcaine offering up change. So outside of electronic voting machines and freepers, where is mCcaine supposed to get those votes? Do you really believe that We The People who have been so obviously screwed by bush are going to somehow get really stupid and vote for more screwing? NOT GONNA HAPPEN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
29. Shit. I thought we were finished with the "Gore '08" stuff.
I love Al Gore, and I think that he won in 2000. I think that he (and WE) were fucked over by illegal means. I also think that Gore is probably the most qualified person to be president.

That said, HE'S NOT RUNNING! He's also not going to be appointed due to a brokered convention (which also isn't going to happen).

Get a grip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerDave921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
31. Gore can't run
Given his views on global warming (or climate change or whatever it's being called now), there is no way he could get elected. Either he would call for drastic reductions in energy usage, which wouldn't get him any votes, or else he would NOT call for drastic reductions in energy usage, which would brand him a hypocrite. He's kind of stuck given hos well-publicized views.

And I think he's a one-trick pony. Take away the climate, and the man has little else to offer now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl_interrupted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. After 8 years as VP , he has nothing to offer?
He has more experience than Hillary & Obama combined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerDave921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. clarify
What I mean is that he has spent the past 5 years talking about little else other than the climate. He has become so closely associated with the climate that that has become his defining issue. So yes, that would be a handicap.

Also, I think his predictions for disaster are a little excessive, which may make him look like an alarmist should he run for president and come under more heightened scrutiny.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Obviously you haven't read "The Assault on Reason."
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 03:57 PM by dbaker41
Gore has been talking about other issues than the environment, although that IS his signature issue.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerDave921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. I have not read it. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC