Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What % chance do you honestly give either to win the nomination at this point?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:02 PM
Original message
What % chance do you honestly give either to win the nomination at this point?
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 07:03 PM by loveangelc
Just a random question. with the delegate math, popular vote possibilities, and the (continuing?) jeremiah wright scandal, what chance do you give both candidates of winning the nomination?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. First off, there is no Wright scandal.
There is a scandal about Hillary's ongoing secrecy and refusal to reveal records.

Having gotten that off my chest, I put it at 90% Obama, 5% Hillary, 5% other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. um, there is a Wright scandal. It was all over the morning news shows, theyre still talking about
this on CNN and infact will be looking at the most offensive sermons or something at 9 on CNN.

Will this be a scandal tomorrow? IDK but lets be hoenst, its an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. So that's why he polled better yesterday?
News dump cycle timing strategy worked perfectly. Also, information went out right when Obama was at his best (50%). He was able to withstand the hit. Now, having only winged Barack, he is stronger and on message.

What percentages do you think apply? Or do you only ASK the probing questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #23
41. I dunno if it worked out perfectly or not. It's still a major deal and may continue to be tomorrow.
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 07:36 PM by loveangelc
why would cnn be advertising for it and what the top ten most offensive things he's said, if it werent a big deal? answer that question.

He polled one point better than the day before, do we really know if that is statistically significant? Unless something else happens thats big idont know how this won't be an issue, at least for a little while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Because CNN is always about 24-48 hours behind the times.
And they appeal to the small-minded set -- the set that still think this is an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. they cover things that are of interest to their viewers.
It is silly to say this is not interesting to many people just based on the number of views on youtube of this pastor and the videos online now. Lets see how it plays tomorrow. If theyre not still making a big deal about this at the end of the week then maybe its all over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. CNN is a bullshit propaganda organ.
I guess you can get used to anything, but it's always been total crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #23
57. Actually, he's down 5 points in three days, nationally.
Go to realclearpolitics.com for links to most of the national polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. 99.99% chance it goes to Obama.
Barring something really horrific.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. I'm thinking maybe even higher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. I hope so..
but the reality is that troublesome politicians have to be careful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obama 80-85% chance
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 07:07 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. 60/40 for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demokatgurrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
56. I agree with that . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
65. That sounds about right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. 99% Obama
I think he's got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftrightwingnut Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, Obama has the edge. He will be forced to give Clinton the VP slot.
Distasteful as that may be to Obama supporters. That's just what my gut tells me right now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. What makes you think
That he will be forced to give her the VP slot?

I really don't think she wants it, and I really don't think Obama wants her. I think it would be bad if he did win the nomination and had her as VP after all she has said about him not being ready, not having the experience, etc. I also think it would help McCain out more than it would Obama. To many repugs just don't want another Clinton in the whitehouse no matter what spot she would hold, they will come out in record breaking numbers to prevent it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftrightwingnut Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #20
38. I agree neither wants it. But I think that they will be encouraged to cut a deal.
"Forced" is probably too strong a word. "Strongly encouraged" for "the good of the party."

It's a lot easier to imagine if you are on the outside instead of in one partisan camp or another.

If you manage to force it past the gag reflex, it sort of makes sense. How else do you accommodate the Clinton supporters? Clinton did get nearly half the delegates.

Ideally, Obama should pick someone else. These are not ideal circumstances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Obama 75% Clinton 49%.
Wild guess, but that's what you asked for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adoraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. you do realize that doesn't make any sense right? :p
anyways my guess is 99% Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. I had 99% originally
but "wildly" second guessed myself. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adoraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. no what I mean is
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 07:18 PM by adoraz
having 75% for one and 49% for another doesn't make any sense. it would either need to be 75% and 25% or 51% and 49%. :)

edit: unless you did that purposely to make it wild then nvm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. No I misread the OP. I was talking in the general.
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 07:21 PM by izzybeans
I'd say 80/20 obama for the nomination.

On edit: thanks for straightening me out, I sometimes read the OP too fast if I'm multitasking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adoraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. oh ok I see
for the GE I say Obama 60% McCain 40%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. A realistic guess from me would be low 50s for Obama.
I don't think Clinton could get higher than high 40s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. That is a wild guess...
75%+49% = 124%

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. We are talking about chances of winning not percentages of the vote.
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 07:17 PM by izzybeans
If the final goal was to obtain a constant number I could substitute percentages of the vote for degree of chance.

And I realize now that I am talking about the general when clearly we are talking about the OP.

That percentage looks like 80/20 Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
32. Cool. Gotcha. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Um that's impossible - adds up 124% chance
With only 2 contestants, the total probabilities should add to 100. 75/25, or 51/49. but 75/49 just means you're on crack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. see above-and I guess I misread the op because I'm thinking of the general.
So I'm giving Clinton roughly a 50/50 chance and Obama a much greater one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #21
36. Ah, I see what you mean now /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PseudoIntellect Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. Clinton 20% chance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. Chance of both candidates winning the nomination: 0%
Sorry for the snark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. Obama 70% Clinton 20% Neither of the two 10%
A lot can happen in 4+ months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The River Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
15. There's A 99% Chance
Hill-Bill will try to steal the nomination via Super D's,
a 30% chance she will and a zero% chance it will do her any good if she does.
That gives Obama a 70-30 shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihelpu2see Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
40. If she (Hill-Bill that is) pulls it off, I, an elected dem. in my town, I leave the party
and go to work for Nadar. Because, what I had thought back in 2000 would have been proven to be true. That neither party is interested in the liberal, progressive masses (most of the populous) they are interested in power and what power they can grab from attaining more and more....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The River Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. I Hear You
I took a 30 year hiatus from "organized" politics
after the McGovern disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihelpu2see Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. I was, I think, 2 years old when that happened, I helped Ned Lamont beat Sen. Joe LIEberman in
the Primary, only to see Joe woo the CT republicans to vote him in for 6 more years. I worked hard to help a local Probate Judge win as a D in a republican town and I feel that I helped Obama win in my town and in CT. So, for a younger liberal dem. it would be very depressing to see Sen. Clinton think only of herself and not the huge numbers of new young voters who are finally engaged.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
22. Obama 99%.
There are only 9 contests left (11 if MI and FL go again). Too few for Clinton to overcome Obama's lead. There's no chance the superdelegates are going to give it to her anyway. If Obama is ahead on points (by even a little bit), that's all that will matter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
24. 50% - win or loose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
25. Obama, 80%. And I'm a pessimist. But Pelosi has been signaling
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 07:17 PM by wienerdoggie
support for his position, and that may ultimately sway most of the SD's--she is the most powerful female Democrat in Congress. Now, will the Wright thing hurt him? Maybe, but I have a hunch that the Dem party does not want him to go down over such a stupid reason, because that new guilt-by-association standard will not serve Hillary if she's the nominee either. I'm pretty sure the GOP has got stuff on her and Bill, association-wise, that's worse than an angry black preacher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
28. 60 - 40 Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
29. Neither will win
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 07:21 PM by susankh4
we'll have a white guy in the White House in 2008.

Or: less than 25% for either of them at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PseudoIntellect Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #29
44. nomation =/= presidency.
I seriously doubt a white guy will win the nomination...LOL...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #29
55. He already has
his name is John McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tribetime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
33. if fox loses power
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 07:26 PM by Tribetime
and they're off the air the final month I'd say 100% if not 95% if both on same ticket or 65% if either one individually
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
34. 90% in favor of Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
35. 100% chance - Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #35
53. I know some bookies who would love to meet you...
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 10:37 PM by depakid
they love certainty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
37. Obama 3-1 Favorite In The Primaries
McCain 3-2 favorite in the General aganst Obama or Clinton...

How did the Dems ever get in this mess?

Even if the war is a push this might be the first time in electoral history that a party held the White House in the midst of a recession...

Obama and Clinton remind me of two children fighting over a toy...They end up breaking it...

I'd put the odds at 30-1 but I think the only thing that could rescue the Dems is a deadlocked convention that turns to Al Gore...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
39. 75-25 Obama
and it's only that high for Hillary because I don't trust her at all. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikekohr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
48. 90% Obama, 10% Clinton
In the general election Obama 54%, McCain 46%. If Clinton wins our nomination McCain 51%, Clinton 49%.

mike kohr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
49. HRC will receive 370 or more electoral votes.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. Nomination.... there are no electoral votes,
also this proves you are delusional

Hillary breaking 280 electoral votes in the GE is extremely unlikely



370 is not possible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
50. 100% Obama
There are no chances here. It's over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #50
54. Those bookies would love to meet you, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
52. 99% Obama 1% Other
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
58. Obama is going to win the nomination. I'm not sure if Hillary and the other repugs
have damaged him too much to win the general election. Yes,I include Hillary as a repug. Once she sides with a repug over a democrat she is no better than them. I will just be pleased to see Hillary NOT win the democratic nomination because I knows how much she wants it. I want democrats to show her that kneecapping your opponent on character issues is no longer acceptable. To have a debate on the issues is fine but trying to destroy their character (I take him at his word that he is not a Muslim, Jesse Jackson won S.C. too,etc..etc). So I would like the Clintons to learn a lesson. In addition, I think Hillary has a worse chance at winning the general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formernaderite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
59. its 50-50 now
but neither candidate is strong at this point...the fact that Mcain is running even with them, is upsetting. Both their trains have slowed... oh well, GO democrats!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #59
62. no way. Obama has a far greater probability of winning the nomination
how far greater? Hard to say but definitely over 60%. Hill has no more than 40%- and that's being generous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formernaderite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #62
63. maybe if not for the fall out
and super delegates. I don't trust Hillary to back off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeschutesRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
60. no percentage applies
Unless Clinton pulls out what is likely a mathematical impossibility, Obama has already accumulated enough elected delegates to become the nominee. So 99% Obama, 1% just in case for Clinton.

The superdelegates are not going to tear the Democratic Party into shreds as the Clinton team hopes and throw their votes to her while Obama has the most elected delegates. And sure, if I was a SD I would let Clinton continue to think she has a shot with SDs, because I'd like not to have my arm clean twisted off while being pressure by them to vote for them instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moobu2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
61. 80% chance the primary goes to Barack and 100% chance we loose the GE
Edited on Tue Mar-18-08 08:14 AM by moobu2
Thanks Borack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
64. Obama 70/30
I think there are still several Democratic Party leaders who aren't sure about Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
66. 100% OBAMA n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
67. i give BO about 85-90% for nomination. I give BO 30% in GE unfortunately. Hope the speech is good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
68. Your OP sounds like a push poll when you say "scandlal".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
69. Mathmatically, from what I've heard, Obama has the majority of delegates
In terms of securing the nomination, what I've also been hearing is that, technically, neither candidate will be able to win enough delegates to put them over the top once all of the primaries are completed (with or without Michigan and Florida), so it appears that the party is probably going to have to broker some kind of arrangement that recognizes that Obama has won (and probably will continue to win) the majority of the delegates but also takes into account that Hilary has made a very strong showing in the primaries, particularly in the larger states, and has a significant constituency within the party. At this point, I am concerned that any decision (including the use of "super delegates" to tip the scales one way or another) that is made that doesn't include some kind of Obama/Hilary pairing is likely to be divisive for the party and could suppress voter turnout. As for the conflict between Obama and Hilary, I think that they would be able to smooth over their differences and work together. They HAVE, of course, been competing against each other and most vice presidential candidates, after all, seem to emerge from the initial field of presidential candidates. What do people expect from a primary, particularly in a race as contested as this one has been? Also, with Hilary on the ticket, Obama will be able to take advantage of Hilary's strengths on some of the issues that he may be somewhat weaker on and vice versa not to mention the possibility that the prospect of Hilary as a VP nominee might not drive as many Republicans to polls as she would if she were the Presidential nominee. That's just my $0.02.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intaglio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
70. Given that however unlikely someone might try bribery
89% Obama, 10% Clinton, 1% other
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC