The Dean Scream, Part II

[RUMMYisFROSTED]

Eom.

[Kittycat]

1. Is hillary playing victim again?

[RUMMYisFROSTED]

2. Nope. Just another bullshit issue being prattled on about.

[Acadia Blue]

3. Remember it the rePIGS who framed "victim" as the word to use

against her. DON'T LET THE REPIGLICANS FRAME THE ATTACKS AGAINST EITHER. WE CAN 'T LET THEM DIVIDE AND WIN. THEY ARE SETTING IT UP SO WE LOSE. WAKE UP PEOPLE.

[patrice]

4. Absolutely right!

In fact, you've got to wonder if those who keep on keeping this stuff going have the same goals as you do.

We've got to be strong enough to steer every opportunity toward OUR issues, with our memes, not theirs.

If someone wants to talk about Hillary being victimized as a woman, and if you're an Obama supporter, TAKE WHAT THEY SAY AWAY FROM THEM by discussing sexual discrimination - NOT Hillary - in terms that represent:
1. the things that you and HC supporters CAN agree on about sexual discrimination (without using Hillary's name) - and -
2. the CONNECTIONS between the things you CAN agree about and Obama's policies etc. on the same issue.

P.S. I recommend the Socratic Dialogues as a model for how to go about doing this.

[RUMMYisFROSTED]

5. If you whip out the Socratic method you usually get "poop" as a reply.

:banghead:poop

[patrice]

6. LOL!!!

:banghead:poop

Yes, people usually run from the Socratic method (by turning facetious or by using ridicule), because the Socratic method works off of questions and most people, when questioned, are empty and they don't want to show others that there is no there there.

I say NGU anyway and to begin with the easiest most agreeable and attractive questions possible. And at least in an environment such as this, even if they run, at minimum you'll show others that they are specious fools, and at maximum you may reveal that they actually are one of those bricks of rock-hard excrement that ALL of us, regardless of candidate, are banding our heads against.