|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Dawgs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 10:56 AM Original message |
How about split the delegates in MI 50/50 and split the delegates in FL 55%/45% for Hillary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
1. No on both. She beat Obama by a 3rd in FL. MI needs a do-over. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 11:00 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 11:08 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Hard to win where no real election was held - kind of like grading imaginary exams.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 11:14 AM Response to Reply #1 |
9. perhaps a 70/30 split in Florida and Mich at 60/40 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 11:20 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. There's no basis on which to divide the MI delegates in any way. There was no vote. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
2. Wouldn't that be rewarding the Democratic leaders of Michigan and Florida |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
4. It may well be to Obama's advantage to go ahead and redo Michigan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustABozoOnThisBus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 11:08 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. re-do how? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 11:12 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Actually excluding both Michigan and Florida would be my first choice too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 11:23 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. And a good chunk of the FL voters will vote for McCain in Nov. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 12:52 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. I disagree - but I'm not going to fight over it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 11:24 AM Response to Reply #4 |
13. True - even a closer loss may prevent Clinton from claiming the popular vote (Incl FL/Mich) win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
8. How about we play by the rules for once? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
10. again Obama got 33% in Fl while Clinton got 50% MI Obama 40% Clinton 55% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 11:26 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. vote "undesided" in MI -- TRUE - so split the 40 to O=20 & E=20 & H=60, set FL at 70/30 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 12:26 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. That does not accurately account for those who stayed home because it was not valid. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustABozoOnThisBus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 12:32 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. True. But, a re-vote (Dem only) will bring out hordes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 12:33 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Is there any way to keep the R's out? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustABozoOnThisBus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 12:39 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Based on the January primary, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
16. fine whatever - just make it stop. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustABozoOnThisBus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 12:43 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Stop? There is no "Stop" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olshak (339 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
22. No... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 04:51 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC