Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MI/FL Delegate Options Laid Out - Not Looking Good for Clinton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:45 AM
Original message
MI/FL Delegate Options Laid Out - Not Looking Good for Clinton
Edited on Fri Mar-14-08 10:45 AM by Oreo
The only way Clinton has a lead is if the MI/FL votes are taken as is. And even with that her lead would only be 15 delegates.
One small problem though... that's not counting the 55 delegates that went for Uncommitted in MI.

From 2008 Democratic Convention Watch


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. The situations MI & FL are not the same. FL held a primary that treated all candidates the same..
MI did not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. And one option floated is....
MI divides the delegates 50/50 and FL's vote stands but they lose 1/2 their delegates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. MI needs some kind of do-over. The 50/50 isn't fair or valid. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. That is Bill Nelson's "option". It would be dead wrong.
Read my journals. Florida went along with the GOP and Marco Rubio on this primary thing since early 2006.

They were complicit. I don't care if they split 50 50. But they must not use the totals from the sanctioned primary.

If they do that, if Hillary wins that way...she will not be legit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. wrong. They are the same. Both were invalidated. They are both equally meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
22. Never mind the fact that EVERYBODY knew the votes would not count.
And those who would not show up for a vote that doesn't count would predominantly be Obama supporters. They wouldn't show up to vote on the other issues, being less likely to be homeowners than Hillary's retired supporters.

Florida needs a do-over just as much as MI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. She still doesn't lead with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Thought so. Thanks.
He leads EVEN WITHOUT any votes in Michigan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. Did you subtract Spitzer?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes
Obama picked up another super today also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Thanks for the great site at Dem Con Watch. Enjoy and trust your posts.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. cool.. nice graphics btw
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. I like option 1 (for MI)
Leave the MI delegates out. That's the original plan, it follows the rules. Any re-do will result in a battle over the type of selection, the participants, etc. More hassle than it's worth.

You can't direct the "uncommitted" as a bloc. Some were for Obama, some for Edwards, maybe some for others. The "Uncommitted Edwards" votes, if you could isolate them, would be split across Obama and Clinton.

I'd exclude them. And exclude the superD's from MI, some of whom helped get us into this mess.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hogwyld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. I'm beginning to think this all won't matter
Hillary WILL find a way to overturn the delegates and get the nomination. She will have effectively splintered the democratic party, and alienated all of those new voters from Barack. As The Who so sang, "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss" I think I'm going to go drown my sorrows now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Remember one thing: She can't do it alone...
or fairly. We've proven that we have long memories around here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rydz777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
10. I just find this depressing. We will need both Michigan and
Florida in November to win the White House - certainly Michigan and probably Florida, and this tug-of-war with the DNC is doing nothing but enhance McPain's chances in both states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. We can't piss off those that voted in Florida. Nearly two million. A record turnout. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. Yes, a record turnout of HOMEOWNERS
It completely ignored the middle class and working poor that can't afford mortgages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Homeowners always have a very high turnout. Nothing new there. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. The point is - there was nothing at stake for other voters.
And you can't deny their voice, just because they didn't have a measure on the ballot to turn out and vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. There was RECORD turnout. Why is this mentioned when Obama wins but not HRC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. Fuck em.
You KNOW we won't win Florida anyway. They have the machines, they've already purged the voter rolls. No fucking way we will win Florida.

And if anyone is going to vote republican because of what Florida democrats did to the Florida democratic party, they aren't democrats anyway.

So fuck em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Some surveys show HRC winning it over McCain. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Any survey that does not include ES&S is worthless. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Say wha?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GalleryGod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
14. Katie H..tanned,rested,and augmented! Ready fo that ReVote!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. People forget quickly. Elections are still in one Republican hands...
Edited on Fri Mar-14-08 01:08 PM by madfloridian
answering only to the governor. This time it is Kurt Browning, not your most liberal Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
19. Hillary said Obama campaign told people to vote uncommitted
One of Hillary's defense to get Michigan counted is that Obama had campaign people telling the voters to vote uncommitted if they supported him. With her logic, the uncomitted should count towards Obama.

Imagine being the only one on the ballot and almost losing to uncommitted? (She got 55% of the vote in Michigan).

Another option is to take the Republican approach and penalize each state by only counting half of their delegates. I also believe that any Dem who voted for the early date or signed the legislation should lose their vote as a superdelegate. That includes the Governor of Michigan, who led the fight to break the rules.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zonkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
20. Mich. didn't go for Bush and they won't go for Hillary. I know Michigan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
21. the one good thing about...
all of this, is that the longer it goes on, the more I understand about how it all took place, and who is playing down and dirty with the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
26. Just read this option at your site. Oreo. I do not think it will fly at all
I think superdelegates will do their thing before 1/2 delegates are seated for Florida. Florida is not God, just in their own mind.

"Split the Florida and Michigan pledged delegations 50/50. Superdelegates are free to vote as they wish.
Split Michigan 50/50 including supers. Give Florida pledged delegates 1/2 vote, but based on January election. 1/2 vote for superdelegates also. This is supposedly under significant "

I realize it is speculation, but if it goes that way, she will not be a legit win.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC