|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
IndianaJones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 07:05 PM Original message |
to his credit, Obama did remove McClurkin as soon as it was apparently hurtful. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
1. Some people will accept no less than a pound of flesh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoFerret (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 07:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
15. He has made progress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 07:29 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Why? He certainly has made it clear he doesn't agree with McClurkin... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
2. No he didn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 07:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Seems to me that not inviting him back is a repudiation in and of itself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 07:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Or it could be, as one of his campaign higher ups stated, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaJones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 07:19 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. well, there is that little poll conducted just a month earlier in SC that not many talk about. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 07:21 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Feel free to provide evidence of that, otherwise it's just cynicism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 07:23 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. that statement has been provided here on several occassions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 07:26 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. I see. So someone suggested that and you find it to be believable, therefore... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 08:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
23. Obama's numbers in SC didn't start to move until his bigotry gospel tour... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yes We Did (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 07:19 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. So he had him back? Is that it? I must have missed that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 07:21 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. I didn't say that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 07:23 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. If he was a handyman and you chose to not have him do any more work on your house... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 07:25 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. or it might mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 07:33 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. That's certainly one hypothesis, but Obama had no reason to stand up in Georgia against homophobia.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 07:23 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. I think the OP is playing with you. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iceburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 07:37 PM Response to Reply #2 |
20. Further, he never renounced or rejected McClurkin, nor made any apology/nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yes We Did (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 08:30 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. He did too. Knock it off already. Also... He is the ONLY candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 09:51 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. Yep...Hillary says she wants to "leave it up to the states" which means... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
12. "as soon as it was apparently hurtful" - ? ROFL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 07:35 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. You mean like Clinton backtracking on gushing over NAFTA as soon as she realized it was hurtful? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 09:37 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. When pressed, Obamabots generally try to deflect attention toward something else. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 09:53 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. Just pointing out that when it comes to principles, the Clintons haven't exactly be paragons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 07:40 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. Strangely though, Obama wants to repeal DOMA, while Clinton says it's a "states issue". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 09:27 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Obama is a pandering, calculating politician being sold to the gullible as a savior. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 09:47 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. And Hillary is being sold as some great politician with vast experience... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 10:50 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. I'll refer you to the title of this thread. Says it all, imho. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoFerret (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
14. I give him that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
22. what are you talking about, he finished his 3 performances. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alteredstate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 06:44 AM Response to Reply #22 |
34. You're wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueLizard (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
27. Wow. Talk about re-writing history... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neshanic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 11:15 PM Response to Original message |
32. No, No, No, He was warned before the event, and he still did it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 11:49 PM Response to Original message |
33. He did no such thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 06:57 AM Response to Original message |
35. No props to Obama because he I'm almost positive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 08:45 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC