Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So now Keith is the bad guy?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Pawel K Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 11:55 AM
Original message
So now Keith is the bad guy?
Ok, first Kennedy was irrelevent to all the Hillary supporters. Then according to these ame people the huffington post was filled with a bunch of liberals bent on destroying this party. Now there are some people here that actually are saying democratic underground is crap because most members here seem to support Obama. All that I could not understand but I can not believe these same people are now smearing Keith Olbermann, the only true liberal with a voice on the major networks. Are you people out of your fucking mind? If you are willing to destroy this party for Hillary why don't you just come right out and fucking say it? Hillary already said McCain would be a better president than Obama so I really don't understand why this shocks me but I am so fucking disgusted with you joe lieberman types that never learn a fucking thing, I am now finally convinced you have no shame in destroying this entire party if Hillary doesn't win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Great post, you hit the nail squarely on the head... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
feedingfrenzy Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
50. He has been the Bad Guy since he started lying
a few months back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Keith has shown his bias against women in general and Hillary in particular - deal with it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Keith shows horrible bias
against George W Bush and Karl Rove... I'm sick of it!


It sounds like anyone that decries the nefarious moves of the Hill Campaign is attacked as being anti-woman, which is laughable. Never mind the shitty direct racist attacks that fall out of their mouths like dung - "he's only where he's at because he's black!"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. criticism = sexism
what a phony baloney argument ....or more correctly, excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
32. criticism === racism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #32
46. Except that NOBODY has EVER made that argument.
The only things that have been called racist--and not even by the Obama campaign, which has never made such a suggestion--is cases of racist or racially charged commentary like Geraldine Ferraro's rants against Obama as an Affirmative Action candidate.

The only ones using accusations of bias to stifle criticism are the Clinton campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peaches2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. You are not biased against women if
you do not support Hillary! I have been a feminist since before many of you were born, so don't tell me I don't support women in government, business or anywhere else. BUT....we have progressed way beyond the point where women have to support any and every woman for any and every position, including supporting Hillary for President JUST BECAUSE SHE IS A WOMAN! Women will only have reached equality with men when the selection for all positions is gender neutral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. right on! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mimitabby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. Bravo, Peaches!
" I have been a feminist since before many of you were born, so don't tell me I don't support women in government, business or anywhere else. BUT....we have progressed way beyond the point where women have to support any and every woman for any and every position, including supporting Hillary for President JUST BECAUSE SHE IS A WOMAN! Women will only have reached equality with men when the selection for all positions is gender neutral."


I couldn't have said it better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
45. Me too. I was never anything other than
a feminist. But I've never been a femi-nazi. I never even believed in that term.
Until now. Now that we see the tactics. Now that I've been felt the brunt of their personal cruelty.
Now I believe there is such a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Links, transcripts, quotes, evidence?
On matters like this, I'm not willing to take the unsourced word of a known partisan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Did you REALLY listen to his rant? He wasn't slamming Hillary,
he was telling her she's getting ROTTEN advice from her advisors! I agree with him! I think Hillary would make a great Prez, but the people who are telling her what to do on the stump are just WRONG and they're hurting her campaign!

I'm right there slamming Tweety and the rest of the talking heads for what I see as not only bias but close to Clinton haterd in a lot of what they say, but Keith didn't do that! I don't understand your problem with Keith uness you didn't really listen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. he implied her campaign had something to do with her supporters comments - but gives O a pass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pawel K Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. No, he said Hillary should have distanced herself from those comments by getting rid of her
Edited on Thu Mar-13-08 12:56 PM by Pawel K
and getting rid of her instantly like Obama did, not wait around for her to resign on her own.

Stop lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScottS Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. How delusional can you be? Kieth is great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
30. He's also shown bias against men - deal with it
So now criticizing a woman is sexist?

Huh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pawel K Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
37. Thank you papau for proving my point, I appreciate it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
38. Oh would you please be kind enough to give us some proof of his sexism
Post your proof here too, we've been dying for someone to actually give us some evidence.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5044401

I know you wouldn't accuse someone of such a thing without some kind of evidence right? That would be a move straight out of the Republican play book :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
39. This was a quote a pulled from someone talking about Irans...
president and I thought it might help you think about what you said and what KO said.


"I know I'm a Jewish lesbian and he'd probably have me killed. But still, the guy speaks some blunt truths about the Bush Administration that make me swoon..."


Sometimes bad people actually speak the truth, not everything someone you don't like says is wrong. I didn't see the commentary until today and I didn't see anything sexist about it. I just thought of some of the nasty tactics that the Clintons have used in their kitchen sink campaign and how she smiled and said she looked forward to this part of the game.

Maybe its just because Obama wasn't my desired first choice and I can think without some preconceived bias.


Unless you support Clinton our hate Obama, I really missed why you made your comment. Does your perception of KO being biased against women make the substance untrue? Or...could you go into what he lied about because he is biased against women?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
42. By all means, give details of how Keith has shown a bias against women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Right on the mark
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. Did you know that his "commentaries" always end up
on YOU TUBE for Millions to see?I thought he was on OUR side.....he should keep on the subject of BUSH and what he continues to do to our country.......he should NOT bash Hillary OR Obama. But since he has shown his bias,we don't have to worry about Obama,do we? Nice work,Keith....you have just handed the rightwingnutjobs another free ad about how our party is so divided. Geesus....:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. Are Democratic Party divisions a secret??
who gives a DAMN what the GOP says or thinks??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
48. So if a pundit
gives the Repubs a talking point or two it's bad. But if one of the candidates does this by putting the Repub above their Dem opposition, it's alright? Is that what your saying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. you know, it's odd
I don't hear anything from the Hillary camp about 'destroying the party' I only hear this from the Obama people and from other people of, frankly, dubious connection to the 'party' in the first place. odd, ain't it?

Olbermann's rant was ridiculous, just as many are. I hope that Obama supporters are ready for him to turn the heat on President Obama when he doesn't pull the troops out of Iraq in the first month as promised. I trust I will come back here and see the same people still talking about how great Keith is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Keith did that comment for ratings. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
49. Y'know, your right.
It is odd. Could it be that Hillary and company are the only ones that can't see that they are the problem?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. I liked him when he was a skeptic. But not as an advocate. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. Please check out
http://www.taylormarsh.com/archives_view.php?id=27216

please read and try and learn a "fucking thing"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Could you link to a bigger Hill Shill?
No you cant. Because there isnt one. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. Hill Schill - Obamaland
what's the difference......Her article was right on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Taylor Marsh = HACK.
Edited on Thu Mar-13-08 12:18 PM by americanstranger
Sorry. She's so biased she creeps me out.

Besides, wasn't she against Hillary before she was for her? Anyone who would compromise their principles that easily can't be taken seriously.

And you think KO is biased? Wow.

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. duh....
yes, I think KO is biased and so do you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. I do? Huh.
I thought he was pretty much doing what he always did - seeing a bad situation and commenting on it.

Marsh? She must be getting a nice paycheck from Hillary '08, because it wasn't that long ago she was deriding Clinton as a 'Queen Bee' who wouldn't give sufficient access to liberal media. The only thing that could possibly swing her so hard around is that she's getting something back from the Clinton campaign.

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
17. Ultimately this is a party for exactly two people and then the rest of the party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
19. Did anyone listen to Ferraro? She was talking about more about sexism not necessarily race.
did everyone skip over the part where she included women of any color??? why doesnt any attack that? Because race is the flashpoint and it gets ratings. That is why... and Keith's comments were for ratings. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iceburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
21. He's an excellent sports analyst --- he's out of his league in journalism.
In sports, hope, hyperbole, lies, name calling -- "cheering for one" are not only expected but rewarded. Journalism (quality journalism) demands the absence of ad hominem attacks, and a strong foundation of fact. Obermann's skills in the sports realm are barriers to success as a credible journalist. He should take his ball and go back to the park from whence he came.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. exactly...and let's be clear: Olberman is NOT a journalist, just a tv hack
who moved up from being a radio announcer

these tv idiots are NOT journalists

someone like John Burns or many other brilliant journalists are

not some idiot TV show guy

though of course they label themselves as journalists but no one buys into those claims
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
22. Even the elderly on their death bed wouldn't be so cruel to leave Hillary to her grandchildren.
Or would she? Sort of like destroying the environment because you won't be here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
irish.lambchop Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
29. I'm sorry, I couldn't read your post because
I couldn't make myself look away from your avatar . . . :rofl: but I think I agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
31. just like Paul Krugman is now the bad guy, to Obama supporters
only Paul Krugman is a world renowned brilliant leftist economist

while Olberman is just a guy who moved from radio announcer to tv blatherer

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pawel K Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Where are the posts bashing Krugman?
Edited on Thu Mar-13-08 12:53 PM by Pawel K
show them to me.

Facts are a bitch, aren't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
34. Anybody that speeks bad about HRC is a BAD guy
Thought you understood that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Growler Donating Member (896 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
40. Agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
41. Keith Olbermann has lost all objectivity towards the campaign at this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
43. As pointed out earlier, it's ironic that KO takes Hillary to task for fueling the GOP when his
ridicule of her gives the GOP more ammunition. KO was way off course applying guilt by association to Hillary. Ferraro made some stupid race infused comments, Hillary is not responsible. It's as simple as that.

Many people have very high regard for Ferraro, I don't know her history well enough to make that judgement. I respect her efforts and regret that she made the statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pawel K Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. You didnt listen to what Keith said, did you?
Edited on Thu Mar-13-08 02:03 PM by Pawel K
He never claimed Hillary was responsible for the original comments. His beef was with the fact she wasn't fired instantly, like Obama did when one of his campaign workers called Hillary a monster. But again, simple facts don't stop you guys from spewing your bullshit so I expect for you to keep bashing KO without ever actually listening to what he had to say. Enjoy your closed minded world, we'll all thank you when McCain is the next president and young people such as myself are sent off to Iran. Because at this point it would take a miracle for Hillary to win and as Huckabee knows miracles don't happen. And at this point Hillary has almost ensured that Obama will not be able to win against McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jconner27 Donating Member (356 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
47. is funny coming from Obama supporters
When Paul Krugman came out against Obama and use you know facts to back it up, Obama followers went bat shit crazy calling him an opinion journalist

When Joe Wilson said Obama will fold once McCain raises his voice at him.. Obama nation threw him under the bus.

When Larry Johnson said Obama don't know the difference between CIA and the FBI you couldn't say anything.

Keith has admited he is not a jouralist and the three men I mention one is a respected journalist and the other two you can't aruge with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC