|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Pawel K (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 11:55 AM Original message |
So now Keith is the bad guy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LakeSamish706 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
1. Great post, you hit the nail squarely on the head... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
feedingfrenzy (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 02:47 PM Response to Reply #1 |
50. He has been the Bad Guy since he started lying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
2. Keith has shown his bias against women in general and Hillary in particular - deal with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:01 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Keith shows horrible bias |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
C_U_L8R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:04 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. criticism = sexism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:46 PM Response to Reply #6 |
32. criticism === racism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 02:19 PM Response to Reply #32 |
46. Except that NOBODY has EVER made that argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peaches2003 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:06 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. You are not biased against women if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:07 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. right on! eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mimitabby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
23. Bravo, Peaches! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 02:08 PM Response to Reply #7 |
45. Me too. I was never anything other than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:06 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Links, transcripts, quotes, evidence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:12 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. Did you REALLY listen to his rant? He wasn't slamming Hillary, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:40 PM Response to Reply #13 |
28. he implied her campaign had something to do with her supporters comments - but gives O a pass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pawel K (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:56 PM Response to Reply #28 |
36. No, he said Hillary should have distanced herself from those comments by getting rid of her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ScottS (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:21 PM Response to Reply #2 |
20. How delusional can you be? Kieth is great! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hugabear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:43 PM Response to Reply #2 |
30. He's also shown bias against men - deal with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pawel K (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:57 PM Response to Reply #2 |
37. Thank you papau for proving my point, I appreciate it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:57 PM Response to Reply #2 |
38. Oh would you please be kind enough to give us some proof of his sexism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superkia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 01:37 PM Response to Reply #2 |
39. This was a quote a pulled from someone talking about Irans... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hieronymus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 01:44 PM Response to Reply #2 |
42. By all means, give details of how Keith has shown a bias against women. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
3. Right on the mark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
4. Deleted message |
buff2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
10. Did you know that his "commentaries" always end up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Voltaire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:35 PM Response to Reply #10 |
27. Are Democratic Party divisions a secret?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
verges (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 02:42 PM Response to Reply #10 |
48. So if a pundit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
11. you know, it's odd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas Hill Country (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:14 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Keith did that comment for ratings. Period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
verges (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 02:45 PM Response to Reply #11 |
49. Y'know, your right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
12. I liked him when he was a skeptic. But not as an advocate. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeaLyons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
14. Please check out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:16 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Could you link to a bigger Hill Shill? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeaLyons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:29 PM Response to Reply #16 |
24. Hill Schill - Obamaland |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
americanstranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:17 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Taylor Marsh = HACK. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeaLyons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:30 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. duh.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
americanstranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:35 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. I do? Huh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
17. Ultimately this is a party for exactly two people and then the rest of the party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas Hill Country (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
19. Did anyone listen to Ferraro? She was talking about more about sexism not necessarily race. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iceburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
21. He's an excellent sports analyst --- he's out of his league in journalism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:48 PM Response to Reply #21 |
33. exactly...and let's be clear: Olberman is NOT a journalist, just a tv hack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Life Long Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
22. Even the elderly on their death bed wouldn't be so cruel to leave Hillary to her grandchildren. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
irish.lambchop (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
29. I'm sorry, I couldn't read your post because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
31. just like Paul Krugman is now the bad guy, to Obama supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pawel K (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:53 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. Where are the posts bashing Krugman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krawhitham (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
34. Anybody that speeks bad about HRC is a BAD guy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Growler (896 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
40. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elixir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
41. Keith Olbermann has lost all objectivity towards the campaign at this time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elixir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
43. As pointed out earlier, it's ironic that KO takes Hillary to task for fueling the GOP when his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pawel K (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 02:02 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. You didnt listen to what Keith said, did you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jconner27 (356 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
47. is funny coming from Obama supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 08:46 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC