Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Those caucus delegates Hillary was talking about... there's something going on in Iowa this Saturday

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:50 AM
Original message
Those caucus delegates Hillary was talking about... there's something going on in Iowa this Saturday
Iowa's system of choosing delegates to the national convention is a multi-step process. Their caucuses on Jan. 3 was just the first step. This Saturday is the 2nd step, the county conventions.

Those delegates won on Jan 3 were elected to go to the county conventions that are being held this weekend. From these county conventions, delegates will be elected to attend the Congressional District conventions next month and the State convention in June. The delegates are not guaranteed to remain committed to the candidates who won them on Jan 3. In order to maintain their delegates, the candidates must keep their delegates "rounded up".

"In Iowa, precinct caucuses were held Jan. 3 to select delegates to county conventions this weekend. The county conventions will select delegates to congressional district conventions in April and the state convention in June.

National delegates are elected at the congressional district and state conventions _ the third step of the process. If all the delegates for each candidate show up at every step, the national delegates awarded Jan. 3 will remain unchanged.

But if one side is unable to rally its supporters at any step along the way, it risks losing national delegates.

Obama won the Iowa caucuses in January, picking up 16 national delegates. Clinton came in third, winning 15. Under Iowa's quirky system, Clinton won one more delegate than Edwards, even though Edwards got the second most votes.

Edwards' delegates _ and the chance to win them over _ will add intrigue to the Iowa conventions.

"Absolutely they're fair game," said Karen Hicks, a senior adviser to the Clinton campaign. "We are reaching out to a lot of them, trying to persuade them to join our team."

Both campaigns have been working behind the scenes in Iowa for several weeks, rallying supporters to attend the conventions on Saturday.

"We are doing what we can to make sure we hold onto all the Obama folks," said Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton
..."
more... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/12/its-back-to-iowa-for-ro_n_91226.html


Confused yet? It looks like we're going to run into this in most/all of the caucus states...

Something to keep us busy between now & PA - we have Iowa, Texas & Nevada between now and PA.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. This happens in NV, too
After our precinct caucus in January, we had the county convention in February. Edwards' delegates had to realign, and most went to the Obama camp. Someone there told me HRC lost one, too. So, Obama gained some numbers at that level. Our state convention is in May -- I have no idea what happens at that point as far as delegates switching sides or whatnot, but, delegates are narrowed down again and elected to go on to the National Convention in Denver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. The Caucus System really DOES suck!! Not only does it disenfranchise, but it
is totally MEANINGLESS.

It's all about fucking about, mucking around, and conning people.

I think primaries are a much better system. Vote, and hopefully, they'll be counted. That's better than this foolish shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's an old system
developed before there was much technology available, sort of a heirarchial dinosaur.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. Similar in Maine, too
Our first step int he process was at caucus level. There we elected delegates to the state convention.

The delegates who attend the state convention then elect national delegates. If ALL the delegates show up and commit to the same candidate as at the caucus, the national delegates will be allocated the same. However, if some don't show up and there are no alternates available, the percentage of delegates allocated to the candidates may differ than at the caucus. It's equally important for the campaigns to get their delegates out to the convention as it was to get supporters out to the caucuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. That sounds like Iowa
except Iowa has interim steps of county & district conventions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yep, the nation delegates listed are broken down into county/district/state delegates
and at each convention the candidates have to pass the viability threshold (15%). At the County Conventions this Saturday not only do Clinton/Obama/Edwards have delegates, but so do Biden/Dodd/Kucinich(?)/Richardson. These delegates will have to either try to garner 15% for their candidate or switch to another candidate (or try to gather together to become undecided - with 15% of the vote). Then in April it happens again (1/2 I think of the national delegates are chosen at District) and then again in June (the other 1/2 of national delegates are chosen).

Both the Obama and Clinton campaigns have been organizing. I have received email and mail from the Obama campaign and a robo-call and a (weird) live call from the Clinton camp.

(and I'm just an alternate!)

The thing is - that the Obama camp has made it clear that they are trying to gain as many undecided/non-viable delegates as they can. The Clinton campaign has made it clear that they are attempting to poach Obama's delegates. That could cause some serious discourse at the conventions if they try. Supporters of still active candidates are pretty loyal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC