Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Edwards had given Obama's speeches and had Obama's record,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:00 PM
Original message
If Edwards had given Obama's speeches and had Obama's record,
he'd probably be the nominee. For example, they both spoke at the '04 Dem convention. I heard Edwards' speech, which wasn't bad, but not one for the record books, as Obama's apparently was.

More importantly, Edwards co-sponsored the AUMF bill, and was still giving shamelessly red meat bomb-Iran speeches last year, like this one in Herzliya on January 23, 2007:

Edwards' Herzliya speech: http://www.herzliyaconference.org/Eng/_Articles/Article.asp?ArticleID=1728&CategoryID=223

THAT is why Obama will be the candidate, not his race, or his gender either. If Hillary had fought for impeachment or against so much as one Bush-Cheney crime, she might be the nominee. But she didn't.

Sorry if that's already been pointed out twenty times. :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dumbass Buchanan keeps saying Obama got the keynote speech at the 2004
Edited on Wed Mar-12-08 09:06 PM by Pirate Smile
convention because he is black. :eyes:

Has no one noticed that the guy can give a pretty good speech and just maybe that is why he was picked to GIVE A SPEECH, and, just maybe, that is one reason why he is winning? Naaawwww, it must just be because he is black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It must be tough for Pat and Bay
to figure out which one they hate most. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well, Obama was the only black Democrat in existance..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. That really is so patronizing
It is actually by far one of the best keynote speeches I've heard. (Clinton's for Dukakis was the worst.) His eloquence and that fact that in many ways he was a great "fit" for the message that Kerry wanted - those similarities are why I was totally unsurprised when Kerry endorsed him. I can't think of anyone - that I've heard speak in the Democratic party who is either as close in world view to Kerry or as eloquent as Obama - so I bet that it was an easy choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. It looks like Kerry recognized his talent early on
and wanted to help him get ahead. I don't think Obama had even won his US Senate race at that point, had he? That speech must have helped if he hadn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. No, but by then the Republican had to drop out due to a sex scandal
and was replaced by Alan Keyes. So, he had a super easy race. I never read who (if anyone) suggested him to Kerry - I assume people in campaigns do - but he was an excellent choice. The speech fit nicely with the message of that convention - which I still think was a great convention. Had he gone negative, the race would have been over then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ossman Donating Member (883 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Edwards is a twinkee. That is why he lost.
Play video of him fluffing his hair for 8 minutes. No man does that. Barak is a man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Fuck you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I think his problem was his record.
Edited on Wed Mar-12-08 09:22 PM by dailykoff
His message was fine and he's as telegenic as any of them. But his voting record is like Hillary's, and that's what sunk them both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Take your homophobic bullshit to Freak Republic please n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. You're a piece of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. Come out of your basement and quit yanking off to it already.
Jeez. Life is passing you by.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. True, if Edward's was giving Obama's speeches he might be the nominee
because then he wouldn't have been perceived as threat and the MSM might actually have covered his campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. You listen too close.
:headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. Obama's record ? What record?????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Very similar to Hillary's, except where it really counts:
Hi saracat, here's a pretty good comparison:

Hillary:
- NO on Amendment No. 4882 that would have banned the use of cluster bombs in civilian areas.
- YES on Bankruptcy bill (S.256) which stripped protections for people in debt.
- YES on Kyle/Lieberman bill that sets the stage for the US to take military action against Iran.
- YES on the Iraq War Resolution.
- Hillary refused to sign the AFC Anti-Torture Pledge.

Obama:
- YES on Amendment No. 4882 that would have banned the use of cluster bombs in civilian areas.
- NO on Bankruptcy bill (S.256) which stripped protections for people in debt.
- In response to the Kyle/Lieberman bill that sets the stage for the US to take military action against Iran Obama drafted legislation stating that Congress did not grant President Bush the authority to attack Iran, either through the Kyl-Lieberman amendment or any resolution previously adopted.
- Not then in the Senate, but took a strong public stand against the Iraq War Resolution.
- OBAMA signed the AFC Anti-Torture Pledge.

McCain:
- NO on Amendment No. 4882 that would have banned the use of cluster bombs in civilian areas.
- YES on Bankruptcy bill (S.256) which stripped protections for people in debt.
- YES on Kyle/Lieberman bill that sets the stage for the US to take military action against Iran.
- YES on the Iraq War Resolution.
- McCain refused to sign the AFC Anti-Torture Pledge.

from original post by grassfed: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4990975&mesg_id=4990975
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. For 2 years. Whoop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. His Iraq speech was 6 years ago, and his 8-year Ill. state senate record
Edited on Wed Mar-12-08 10:03 PM by dailykoff
is also impressive. There's a graphic showing some of his Illinois legislation which I'll post as soon as I find it.

Here's a copy of it:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iceburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 05:49 AM
Response to Reply #17
25. That's a pretty record ...
Notice how many of the bills in the prop didn't even pass? 40? If his record had substance he wouldn't be buffing it up with fluff bills and bills that didn't pass. He wasn't persuasive enough to even get a stem research bill, or a ban on discrimination based on sexual orientation, passed at the state level. What's he going to do if he gets to the oval office ...rule by decree/vetoe like brother Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #16
24. Actually, he's been in the U.S. Senate for
over three years now, and he spent 8 years in the Illinois State Senate- and no he didn't often vote present. He has a clear record- like it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
13. What record???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. The one you obviously haven't bothered to look up yet. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. i think obama would still be where he was if he were white, but would not get the black...
vote 9:10 like he is, so would probably be a few delegate points less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karmicglee Donating Member (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
21. You mean the media wouldn\'t talk about trivial haircuts if Edwards were a good orator?
For some reason, I don\'t buy that theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 05:26 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. John Edwards is a terrific speaker.
I actually like his speeches better than Obama's. When he is on, he is ON.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC