Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why am I supporting Obama and not Clinton against McCain? Two reasons.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:44 PM
Original message
Why am I supporting Obama and not Clinton against McCain? Two reasons.
1) In the event that the GE is a cakewalk, I'd rather win with Obama than win with Clinton, and

2) in the event that the GE becomes unwinnable, I'd rather LOSE with Obama than LOSE with Clinton.

It's just that simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't understand why you would rather lose with Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Because then I'll know we gave it our best shot with a campaign I can be proud of.
Not a campaign that we'll look back on and say--"Well, we stooped to their level, and where did it get us?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Great answer..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
not_too_L8 Donating Member (757 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. thank you..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I like your answer.... but we were "nice" in 2000 and 2004.
And where did it get us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. We were "nice," but we weren't smart.
Let's talk about 2004, which I feel we lost, and not 2000, which I feel we won.

Now, Obama is a strong candidate in the areas that Kerry was weak in--firing back at ugly rumors immediately, building a strong base with "outsiders" such as young people, blacks and independents, and generally making people vote for him because they WANT to, not because they HAVE to. If he can't win against McCain, who can?

Hillary? But Obama is doing better than Hilllary on a National Level and a Regional Level, and I've seen very little variability in those numbers. The Democrats as a whole simply like him better than they like Hillary, and they like the campaign he's running more than they like Hillary's.

So, when I say a candidate I can be proud of, I don't just mean a positive run with a minimum of dirty tricks and sliming. I mean a candidate whom Democrats really LIKE, not just respect. Who tries to bring Americans together instead of strengthening the borders between red states and blue states. What I'm saying is EVEN IF HE LOSES, it'd be good for the party. I don't think he WOULD lose the GE if Hillary puts aside her anger and gets behind his campaign, but if she does, that's her fault. And if Hillary was our nominee and loses, it'd once again be another episode in the Clinton Soap Opera, not a loss the party could get behind and accept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Nice post, Bicoastal.
:thumbsup: I think it was good that John Kerry has advised Obama's campaign- he said that we would never be swiftboated again, and you are right about Obama's punching back immediately. I have been impressed with that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
islandmkl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obama has a future that won't disappear after one GE defeat....
Hillary may or may not have another real shot 4, let alone, 8 years from now....

This political math in this regard favors the younger; experienced or inexperienced begins to fade with time....which is how it is 'counted' to begin with
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. I agree with point 1, but not point 2
If we are going to lose I'd rather have Clinton at the top of the ticket. That way he's the one who gets another chance in four years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC