Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's clear the corporate whores want McCain for VP and dread Clark

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 08:34 PM
Original message
It's clear the corporate whores want McCain for VP and dread Clark
This is becoming blatantly and ridiculously obvious. McCain expresses NO interest in the position, so I can't imagine why the whores keep trying to shove him in our faces as a potential choice. Maybe they think it will get Kerry, and US, off focusing on the "other" war hero, who is actually a Democrat. Whatever, it ain't gonna work, at least not for this Clark fan. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not working on this Edwards/Clark fan, either.
It's possibly the single-most absurd idea for a VP nominee I have ever heard suggested. Shows you what happens when media whores have too much free time and too little common sense, huh? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. They're playing with us
Kerry won't pick McCain. Speculation is fun and the media need something to do for the next few weeks. Heaven knows they can't cover the scandals in the White House.

MzPip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. I have been thinking the same thing
Clark brings everything that McCain could bring in the way of national security experience plus more, why would McCain be such a great VP choice and not Clark. Something is not right here. There is clearly something going on behind the scenes that most of us are not aware of, of course maybe that is exactly what is supposed to be happening?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't know but I sense the Pukes really fear Clark.
This must mean he's got something they know will undercut AWOL and chickenhawk Cheney. I still believe that a Kerry/Clark ticket would be the absolute best in terms of discrediting illegal resident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Traveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. The only advantage of McCain would be ...
Edited on Mon Apr-05-04 08:55 PM by robg
the possibility of drawing more moderate republicans and independents towards the Democratic Party. The strategy here would be to first form a centrist coalition and gradually move it towards a more liberal platform. Me, I think it would be wonderful if it could be made to work. I'm unconvinced it could ever be made to work. McCain is a bit too right leaning on social issues. Though I really do respect him, we have more than enough talent with centrist appeal in the democratic party: Clark, Edwards, Biden to name a few.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Did you see Hardball tonight?
McCain was on, said he's not switching parties, & he is a Republican. Also, that he doesn't want to be Veep. Said Bush in 2000 asked if he would be interested & he said NO. Also said there are lots of problems with the Repubs & he wants to work from WITHIN to fix. Also, said he is an independent voice from Arizona, which is tradition, & if he was to switch to become Veep, he would lose respect for honesty.

Next big story, they discussed Veeps, & Wes was mentioned. The reporter on Hardball, said Kerry does not trust Clark because he spread Kerry rumors. I thought this had all been resolved. He said Kerry doesn't think Edwards has enough experience, FP, security. Also said that Kerry will not pick Bob Graham, because of his diaries, which are considered really odd. Said that was the reason Gore did not pick Graham.

By the way, the reporter's name is David Shuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yes, I saw that interview. It was very, very interesting.
Matter of fact, that's what inspired this thread! So y'all can just blame ole' Tweety! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I think it has something to do with Matthews hatred of Lehane
Remember when he had Lehane on, & grilled him? Ever since then, Tweety doesn't mention Wes.

Back when Wes was on Hardball for the College tour at Harvard, Tweety was pretty nice to him. Also said something about how much excitement Wes had generated in the audience.

Something happened to his attitude, & I think it had to do with Lehane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. those intern rumors ?
that's a bunch of crap . so if kerry doesn't pick clark they can all start talking about the intern thing and put it out there as if it's true and say kerry didn't pick him because of that. the only one that makes sense is the edwards one on foreign policy and experience but everyone knows if edwards is picked it will not be because of those things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leyton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 09:21 PM
Original message
Hold up.
I thought Clark was DNC? Or is it basically whoever is not getting enough attention is being screwed over by corporations? I want Clark to be in strong consideration for VP, but if that doesn't happen, is it necessarily the fault of the corporate whores? Ultimately, Kerry decides who's VP, not the media. Geez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leyton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. dupe
Edited on Mon Apr-05-04 09:21 PM by leyton
cheers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. The corp/media are always trying to find us the
candidate they fear least. Now they want a Republican.
I like McCain...but he IS a Republican. Why wouldn't we want a Democrat? Why wouldn't we want Wes Clark? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. I really don't think Clark has shown more interest than McCain
If you wish to show evidence to the contrary feel free. You're the one charging conspiracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. Clark would be an ideal choice, IMHO.
Kerry will need 1st rate counsel on Iraq. Cark could leverage his European coalition building experience to transition Iraq to a UN operation. Obviously he is one smart dude and his degree in economics might come in handy as we begin digging ourselves out of this trainwreck of an economy.

This country is going to need to Presidential caliber leaders to fix this mess. I hope Kerry taps him for Veep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tameszu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. Clarkie here who LOVES the McCain VP talk
You're right that it has something to do with the way in which the corporate news media is structured, but not quite the way you think: they are eating up the McCain for VP story because of one reason only: it's compelling and entertaining in the shallow and speculative way that cable and network news networks love, because it boosts ratings. But we shouldn't complain, because, as I've said before:

1) It will almost certainly NOT happen. Kerry hasn't offered it and McCain has pointed to all the reasons why it wouldn't work. This is equivalent to the Hillary candidate fantasies, when everyone who actually took politics seriously knew that there wasn't any chance that she was getting in by the fall.

2) This narrative is a FANTASTIC one for us, because it is directly attached to the "Bush is messing up things so badly that Republicans in his own party is really kicking his ass" narrative. Add McCain's happy words about Kerry to Hagel's and Lugar's, and we have Zell's know-nothing grunts completely trumped. We should lurve the media herd heading in the direction, and this Clarkie is willing to do EVERYTHING in his power to encourage it, and I'm sure the General would too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I think you are right
Its not always easy to disconnect and look at it analytically like that. But no question this is hurting the shrubster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. 2 points
in this case, kerry will be the only one making the decision on vp and it will be based on lots of research, analysis, and thought. so media doesn't really matter. in fact vp picks are often surprises, someone most did not expect. so if the media does not report on clark this means he actually has more of a chance of being chosen based on history. in 2000 many thought gore would pick kerry or graham. but he picked lieberman. while it was known towards the end that lieberman was on the list not many actually thought of him being picked. the same goes for clinton picking gore. nobody would have thought he would pick not only someone else from the south, but from a state right next to him. and of course cheney picked himself for vp. most said bush would get frank keating or some california congressman like chris cox.but we now know and many knew then bush doesn't really control things.

but also important is that i hear others who ran in the primary are many times not chosen for vp. this was the case with bill clinton and george w bush also.

what this shows is we wont really know much until kerry makes his pick. we had two articles come out just days apart , one claiming kerry will make his vp pick early, the other one saying he is in no hurry and that the search is still very much in early stages without them having really done much in that area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Yep
"We had two articles come out just days apart , one claiming kerry will make his vp pick early, the other one saying he is in no hurry and that the search is still very much in early stages without them having really done much in that area."

That was quite hilarious, their grasping at straws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC