|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
stahbrett (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:07 PM Original message |
BREAKING: MI Caucus Likely, Says DNC Rules Committee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
1. Won? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
27. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
americanstranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
2. You said the 'C' word! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
3. I'm cool with this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
4. it would likely be closed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ButterflyBlood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:11 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. That wouldn't be totally fair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BooScout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
34. Tough shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fadedrose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:15 PM Response to Reply #5 |
61. It's like the bible says, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:12 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Nothing wrong with that. i bet Obama does very well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:13 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. If there was a way to do it, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDoorbellRang (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:35 PM Response to Reply #10 |
36. Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:39 PM Response to Reply #36 |
45. What "right" do independents have to vote in a party primary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDoorbellRang (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:07 PM Response to Reply #45 |
58. In a state's open primary laws, last time I looked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:56 PM Response to Reply #45 |
112. There is no right, of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. I don't understand open caucuses/primaries anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alhena (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:31 PM Response to Reply #4 |
25. On the bright side, that would emphasize the 15% of black voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alhena (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:32 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Also, Jesse Jackson won the Michigan caucus in 1988 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:00 PM Response to Reply #4 |
54. My coworker voted in the GOP primary because the Dem primary did not count |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:45 PM Response to Reply #4 |
97. Nope. Michigan has NEVER required registration to participate in a primary. It's unfair to change |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:08 PM Response to Reply #97 |
127. I seem to remember one year where we did.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:56 PM Response to Reply #4 |
111. And Independents, or you have to give Indies... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
6. Yes, let it be a caucus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ExFreeper4Obama (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
7. That doesn't bode well for Hillary. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
9. That's good. Too bad for John Edwards and the rest, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:14 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
12. They're Gonna Turn It Into A Stupid Ass Caucus? How Dumb. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:15 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. That was their original plan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:30 PM Response to Reply #13 |
79. Link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wileedog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:16 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Nobody can/will pay for it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stahbrett (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:17 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. They actually are deciding between a "stupid ass caucus", and a "smart ass caucus" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:42 PM Response to Reply #16 |
92. that was funny. perusing down replies and yours hit me. busted out laughing. thanks n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:19 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. I haven't the vaguest idea whether this is a joke or a serious comment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:24 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Hillary Inc doesn't like caucuses because the "party activists" give Obama the win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:32 PM Response to Reply #18 |
28. but OMC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:59 PM Response to Reply #28 |
53. They Are Disenfranchising, Non-Representative Of The People, And Just Plain Dumb, All On Their Own. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stahbrett (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:10 PM Response to Reply #53 |
59. Complaining about them during a contested nomination process is not good timing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:17 PM Response to Reply #59 |
62. It's The First Time I've Really Become Aware Of Them And How They Work. I've Admitted That Readily. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stahbrett (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:22 PM Response to Reply #62 |
68. Gotcha - I think that's the case for many folks, actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:27 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. I Agree. While They're Part Of The Process, They Are Part Of The Process. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stahbrett (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:31 PM Response to Reply #71 |
80. I can see that point of view as well (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thoughtcrime1984 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:13 PM Response to Reply #53 |
60. Maybe you should wake up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:18 PM Response to Reply #60 |
63. They Should Redo The Primary, As A Primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stahbrett (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:24 PM Response to Reply #63 |
69. That would be fine with me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:28 PM Response to Reply #69 |
74. I Think Obama Would Win The Primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stahbrett (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:33 PM Response to Reply #74 |
82. Not sure, but any poll numbers would wind up being inaccurate predictors, in my opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thoughtcrime1984 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 08:10 PM Response to Reply #63 |
153. It was at first going to be a caucus, no? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:19 PM Response to Reply #53 |
64. Whereas voting into hack-able machines owned by RWers is the epitome of representative democracy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
powergirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:35 PM Response to Reply #53 |
85. The Clintons liked caucuses just fine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:47 PM Response to Reply #85 |
100. texas. hillary lost texas thru the caucus. someone said it wasnt real people. i am a real people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 08:37 PM Response to Reply #100 |
154. IF the TX superdelegates vote for her, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 08:46 PM Response to Reply #154 |
156. No point complaining about them... i can pretty much accept the rules |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 08:02 PM Response to Reply #85 |
152. OMC's speaking for OMC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:35 PM Response to Reply #17 |
37. A joke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:43 PM Response to Reply #17 |
94. must be new hillary talking point. caucus bad. been around a while have never heard.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:33 PM Response to Reply #12 |
33. There you are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zachstar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:36 PM Response to Reply #12 |
38. Stupid fucks? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:03 PM Response to Reply #38 |
56. Not Bullshit At All. Caucuses Are Amazingly Flawed, Unrepresentative, And In Fact Quite Dumb. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zachstar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:05 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. So where were you back in the 90's with this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:19 PM Response to Reply #57 |
65. I Was Sitting At Home Completely Ignorant As To The Process. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inuca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:36 PM Response to Reply #12 |
40. Speaking of stupid ass.... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDoorbellRang (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:36 PM Response to Reply #12 |
41. They can't afford another primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:12 PM Response to Reply #41 |
133. too pragmatic, too logical. too reasonable. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:20 PM Response to Reply #12 |
67. Dems should stand for honest and fair voting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:14 PM Response to Reply #67 |
134. giving hillary florida, without campaigning,denying voters, and mi only her name on ballet? now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:28 PM Response to Reply #12 |
75. My understanding is that they cannot legally have a Primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adoraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
15. a caucus would be awesome :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
19. Bring on the Caucus! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
21. Caucus...ut oh! Clinton has opened up a can of worms she might not have wanted open. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DiverDave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
22. Rules dont apply to me, I drive 100mph |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
23. Best news Ive heard all day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
24. The FL lawsuit against Dean could affect MI also...March 17 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zachstar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
26. Ah I look VERY forward to a new Caucus. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
30. Usually In A Re-Match You Have The Same Rules |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stahbrett (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:37 PM Response to Reply #30 |
42. This isn't a re-match - the first one did not count, and both candidates were not there (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:41 PM Response to Reply #42 |
48. Call It A Re-Do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stahbrett (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:43 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. Michigan tried to game the system by breaking the DNC rules |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inuca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:37 PM Response to Reply #30 |
43. Well..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
andym (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:41 PM Response to Reply #30 |
47. It will be like WA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:43 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. Hillary Lost The Primary 50% -48% And The Caucus 66% -34% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jzodda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
31. caucus great for Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:33 PM Response to Original message |
32. That would be the fastest and cheapest thing for both states to do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
35. hmmmm and would that make Florida look bad for trying to force a false |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
39. Somewhere some bleary eyes staffers are reserving rooms in Detroit and East Lansing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abacus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
44. Good for them, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blocker (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
46. FINALLY AN ELECTION! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mudcat (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
51. 40% showed up just to say "anybody but Clinton" ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StevieM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:02 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. Nope, that's an Obama lie (one of many) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDonkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:28 PM Response to Reply #55 |
76. keep trying to play that V card. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slick8790 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
52. Good deal, I suppose. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
66. Caucuses are bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cottonseed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:25 PM Response to Reply #66 |
70. Caucuses are badazz! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:27 PM Response to Reply #70 |
72. You like rigged elections? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cottonseed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:32 PM Response to Reply #72 |
81. Most real Dems love them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:34 PM Response to Reply #81 |
84. Deleted message |
cottonseed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:42 PM Response to Reply #84 |
93. You've got my number? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cottonseed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:01 PM Response to Reply #84 |
119. Who is we? and what are you going to do with my number? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:03 PM Response to Reply #119 |
123. you know att..... welll.... they got your number. you do like the caucus, so.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:08 PM Response to Reply #123 |
126. Go drink some coffee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:11 PM Response to Reply #126 |
130. just had a cup, thank you, but why your are interested in telling me what to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:27 PM Response to Reply #126 |
141. tell me, really. you are psychic aren't you? you were letting me know i left |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:39 PM Response to Reply #81 |
88. i hadnt either. we had a blast at the one tues, ... here in texas. hillary/obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 08:46 PM Response to Reply #70 |
155. No, actually. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:29 PM Response to Reply #66 |
77. no they arent. any more than electronic machines that are corrupted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:36 PM Response to Reply #77 |
86. Wow, what lack of credibility you have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:38 PM Response to Reply #86 |
87. no... it is a solution for michigans to get to vote. resolve a problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:40 PM Response to Reply #87 |
91. Promoting crooked elections is not a solution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:48 PM Response to Reply #91 |
102. you hillary people are starting to scare me..... a bet twilight zone here. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:00 PM Response to Reply #102 |
116. Sorry, your post is incoherent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:02 PM Response to Reply #116 |
120. gave you zone, but no other corrections to be made. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:03 PM Response to Reply #120 |
122. What is "zone"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:16 PM Response to Reply #122 |
135. let it go. was a joke. a giggle a funny..... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:39 PM Response to Reply #91 |
146. "crooked elections" = "my candidate loses such elections." Your credibility is ZERO on this matter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theboss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:47 PM Response to Reply #66 |
101. How do you commit fraud in a caucus? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:49 PM Response to Reply #101 |
103. sssshhh, he will have your number or you lose credit, or god know what he comes up with on u. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zachstar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:52 PM Response to Reply #66 |
106. You hope it goes to court because it will not benefit Clinton as well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
73. good on michigan figuring out HOW to take care of their voters without just giving the delegates to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
78. Watch the Clinton people whine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:40 PM Response to Reply #78 |
90. they are.... lol lol, look right above this post. bah hhaa. insists like cause obama wins |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
83. Good news! Michigan should have a chance to vote with candidates on the ballot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
npincus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
89. Yippee!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
95. A strong argument is that caucuses cost less than primaries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:50 PM Response to Reply #95 |
104. but i guess if you are happy they resolved you advocate crooked elections???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:52 PM Response to Reply #104 |
108. Simply because she's losing doesn't give her the right to call this democratic process "crooked." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:55 PM Response to Reply #108 |
110. i was happy michigan resolved and they would get to vote. then i was accused of being ok with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:56 PM Response to Reply #110 |
113. I like caucuses because electronic voting machines aren't involved. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:00 PM Response to Reply #113 |
117. then what are they bitchin about. that is what i was thinking. at least paper trail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:01 PM Response to Reply #117 |
118. It really does have a sense of community. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
96. So they just ruled for Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:51 PM Response to Reply #96 |
105. geeez, if it isnt just handing hillary the vote, .... it wont do it for hillary supporters, will it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zachstar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:07 PM Response to Reply #96 |
124. This is another reason why Clinton will lose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InAbLuEsTaTe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
98. That's fine. I say bring it and may the best Caucusian win. That would be Obama! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
99. I doubt this is legal. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:52 PM Response to Reply #99 |
107. why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:58 PM Response to Reply #107 |
115. Because there has already been a state-sanctioned contest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:18 PM Response to Reply #115 |
136. dnc.... again with the blame to dnc. michigan fucked up. they are trying to resolve |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SKKY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
109. Oh yea. This will go over like a fart in church with the Clinton people... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Binka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:07 PM Response to Reply #109 |
125. When Hillary Whines Maybe Everyone Will Realize She Doesn't Give A Shit About MI & FLA Voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:29 PM Response to Reply #125 |
143. the new talking point on florida seems to be... NO new primary. not fair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
114. Isn't a second election illegal according to MI law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hell-bent (593 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
121. No fucking caucuses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zachstar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:11 PM Response to Reply #121 |
129. They have been voting FOR Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:21 PM Response to Reply #129 |
138. he./she knows that. think back to talking to repugs in 2004. clinton people have picked up the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 08:59 PM Response to Reply #129 |
157. Actually, they've broken for BO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SKKY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:12 PM Response to Reply #121 |
132. I thought the general assumption was that rethugs were voting FOR Clinton... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:22 PM Response to Reply #132 |
139. everyone knows. the poster is playing a game with you.... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bilyb (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
128. Michigan should Caucus to determine if they want to have a caucus :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smiley_glad_hands (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
131. So now watch Clinton say that a caucus is unfair and that the first results should count. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:20 PM Response to Reply #131 |
137. yup yup yup/ i didnt know it was such a crooked, unfair and illegal thing, the caucus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Binka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:34 PM Response to Reply #131 |
145. See Post 125 I Agree Completely! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loveangelc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
140. I wonder if this is true! If so thats very good news for Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:28 PM Response to Original message |
142. Great for Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:31 PM Response to Reply #142 |
144. why is a caucus necessarily so much better for obama. not getting why hillary afraid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
147. please tell me, why is caucus assumed to be good for obama. why hillary afraid? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 07:17 PM Response to Reply #147 |
149. Caucuses exclude the hoi-polloi. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 07:51 PM Response to Reply #149 |
150. like the lottie tottie.... jr leaguers... well then they are fair weather voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Diane R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
148. Not good news for Queen Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tokenlib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
151. In 2004 we could vote in the caucus on the internet, by mail, or in person........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DiverDave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-07-08 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
158. Just amazing, the rules mean nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-07-08 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
159. Yes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 03:36 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC