Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Maybe a scenario most reasonable and real supporters can get behind

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:54 AM
Original message
Maybe a scenario most reasonable and real supporters can get behind
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 11:47 AM by LostinVA
The Primary is so damned close, and I;m starting to think both candidates need the other to beat McCain, and we sure as hell know both candidates' supporters are needed -- as well as Edwards', DK's, etc.

I was thinking about this on my long, rainy commute this morning, and Bunnies' excellent OP made me think about it more.

What all would you say if something like the following went down before the convention (no flaming, no bashing, no dickishness, please -- we need to start thinking -- we can go back to fighting at noon):

I think there's a possibility this will happen in a "backroom deal" way, depending on the next few weeks. And, I think it will go Clinton/Obama, because of what what each brings to the ticket and because of the senatorial seniority thing. This is pure speculation on my part, but, depending on the next six weeks or so, I think a great scenario would be HRC in the top spot, Obama VP. 12 years of Dem rule, with Clinton serving one term, with Obama promised 100% support in his run as President, and HRC given a USSC appointment if possible... or, at least a Federal judgeship if she wants it.

As Is aid in the other thread, it's fun speculation -- like talking about "Lost."


on edit: I won't comment much, because I'm interested to see what people have to say.

on edit 2: I'm changing the scenario to reflect Kurt's suggestion.

on edit 3: She could serve one or two terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:00 AM
Original message
Seriously...and non-snarkily....
...I just can't see Obama taking such a deal after all the character-assassination done by the Clinton campaign the past couple weeks.

I think he'll give Hillary the virtual middle-finger.... and it will be deserved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clovis Sangrail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. o.o
Do you realize how aristocratic that sounds?
Not the idea of Clinton/Obama or Obama/Clinton, but the "backroom deal" for support and a USSC appt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Not aristocratic at all -- it's politics, unfortunately
It's almost as bad as Olympic figure skating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think its a reasonable solution
But I have doubt that those who have felt the hug of hope can settle for less than immediate gratification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wayjose Donating Member (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Obama will not take VP, she will take it
and Bill will be UN Ambassador
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. only scenario that will lead to victory in November. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. Clinton/Obama/Clinton
With a Clinton/Obama ticket, we would also be getting Bill, and the world loves Bill. I was thinking she should agree not to run for prez and back him in 2012. That way, they both win. After that, they could run in 2016 on their own merits as president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. The candidates agree to Clinton/Obama, and that Hillary will serve only one term.
Not going to happen, but it's the right answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. I actually think that's fine
Again, it probably won't happen, but it would work, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
23. And she can't run again if they lose
That has to be part of the deal. If he steps aside and she loses, she doesn't get another chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. That's a given... if the Dem candidate loses in 2008 they will be the most hated figure in the party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. I don't understand the judgeship.
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 11:04 AM by Bleachers7
Why would she want that? Also, I doubt she would survive a senate approval.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. how is that reasonable?
Obama leads in the pledged delegate count and will continue to lead in it up to the convention. Why would he accept 2nd place on the ticket? Because of Senatorial "Seniority"? Insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Question answered
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
26. It might be worth it for him
Then in 4 years, he could either run as the VP or be the presumptive frontrunner for the nomination if they lose (that has to be part of the deal...she doesn't get to run again in 4 years if she is at the top of the ticket and they lose). But I can't see her agreeing to only serve 1 term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleTouch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #26
33. No reason she couldn't serve 2 terms...
...and he gets the 2 terms thereafter. He's young and has time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pbca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
12. Seriously, not trying to be dickish but..
I won't vote for Hillary, regardless of the VP - not this year, not in 4 years, not in 8
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Understood
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #12
30. Some folks don't have to try
In your case it appears to be the easiest thing in the world! :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
13. I Agree With You Completely, And Think That May Be Exactly How Things Go.
I think it would be an awesome thing if it turned out like that. It would be exciting as hell!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. I agree!
Poor Johnny wouldn't know what to do.

And, who the heck can they get as VP???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phillycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
16. I would be very happy to vote for that ticket.
It would really allay my dislike for Obama's arrogance in running really before he should have - should have been 2012 or even 2016 before he ran for Pres. Dude was a STATE SENATOR two years ago. If he can show that he is willing to take a backseat and actually learn about federal politics for 4 years, I would have a lot more respect for him - and it would make him more than the empty suit I see now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Exactly my main problem with him before The Ex Gay Clown event
Which is why I would get behind him in a Presidential run with four years as VP under his belt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
18. I dunno. I just don't know. The only way I would consider it would be Clinton/Obama.
But I have such grave reservations about him. I do not, at this point, think I could get on board.

It would definitely be a nuke to the heart of the GOP. It would definitely energize the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
19. this is Hillary's only hope now since she can't win.
Fuck her! She gets nothing. She deserves nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Yet another postive message of Hope and Change
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #20
34. No, It's a message of disgust at a reprehensible Human Being
Hillary can not take this away from Obama, so she wants to force him to share.
Fuck that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
21. If the candidates would agree, that just might work
I can't see HRC agreeing to only serve one term, and while I think Clinton at the top of the ticket makes more sense than the other way around in some ways, I don't think it's fair to ask him to play second fiddle when he has won more delegates. But if she would agree to only serve one term, and not to run again in 2012 if they lose, it might be worth it for him to accept the VP slot, and your plan just might work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #21
36. I think it might, too
Wouldn't it be fun to be able to switch bodies with Howard Dean for a bit?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
22. I actually talked to somebody last night at the caucus
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 11:29 AM by Blue_Roses
who was voting like this. She said we can't get Barack Obama in the WH without Hillary. Four years of Hillary as pres with Obama as VP. Weird but I could go for it if all else fails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
24. Pffft. Reasonable for a Clinton supporter.
Completely unreasonable for Obama supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
27. Obama will not be Clinton's 3rd wheel. Sorry.
:hi: Just my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. A "3rd wheel" in charge of chairing the US Senate for the next 4 years.
Sounds good to me! B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. Yeah, I'm sure that's what he's angling for, NOT
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
28. It sure makes sense to me!
I started a thread about this exact same scenario a few hours back:
www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4899922

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #28
37. I missed that -- sorry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. No problem
I would be happy if this whole Forum was flooded with threads calling for a Unity Ticket! B-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celeborn Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
29. That would be fine.
I just want it to end soon. I'm past the point of caring whether Obama or Clinton comes out on top. I just know that this cannot last until late August without seriously decreasing our chances of defeating McCain. I'm not a Hillary supporter, but at this point I'd be happy with a Clinton/Obama ticket so we can get to the business of kicking McCain's ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleTouch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
31. I would be thrilled and delighted with such a solution. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
35. I'm in agreement because I'm thinking long-term, not short-term
One thing holding a lot of people back is their perception of Obama as inexperienced. I don't understand why only 1 term would be agreed upon for Hillary. Presidents traditionally get their agendas accomplished more decisively in the second term, for better or worse.

FWIW, I was discussing this issue with a friend this morning. He brought the subject up; I didn't. He is extremely well-versed with the world of politics, as cynical and unimpressed by any candidate as a person can be, but he thinks Clinton/Obama is the ticket to the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluehoosiergal Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
38. Why its not gonna happen
She cannot overcome his lead in pledged delegates, right? That is pretty much accepted, HRC supporters, you can do the math and even in a best case scenario, it is damn near impossible.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/118240/output/print

Or do it yourself and see:

http://www.slate.com/features/delegatecounter/

I think what HRC is hoping for now is that she will be rescued by the supers who will pressure Obama into being her Veep to ensure democratic rule for the next 16 years. The Dems know they have to have Obama on the ticket because of his extraordinary fundraising and his ability to attract new young voters. That sounds great to me, its just that Obama can accomplish that without her, but she cannot without him. And how many HRC supporters can realistically imagine at this point her accepting to be his Veep? Really, the only way it will work that is fair is he gets top spot because he leads in the pledged delegates at the end. I will accept HRC as the nominee if she ends up with the most pledged delegates at the end, but that is next to impossible.

So here is my hopeful prediction on how she will have to drop out or assume the Veep position. Expect very soon he will have a one-two punch: he will announce the support of the rumored 50 new supers http://thepage.time.com/2008/03/04/tom-brokaw-says-obama-has-50-more-superdelegates-in-his-back-pocket/ and at the same time will announce his never-ever-been-heard-of-before fundraising total for the month of February, rumored to be over $50 mill and possibly as high as $70 mill!

When that happens, the party elders will have a heart to heart with HRC and tell her that there is no way she can win and must drop out now so we can prepare for the GE without her taking more cheap shots at Obama and giving the 'pubs more fuel to attack himin the GE. She will never accept his Veep offer and hopefully will just go back to being a Senator. You heard it here first. Gobama!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. So Hillary should quit because Obama raised more $$$?
I think Superdelegates pay attention to the popular vote in all these primaries, and especially in battleground states.

I also think Superdelegates pay close attention to national polls and who can beat John McCain in November.

Hillary's numbers have been improving steadily over the past few days (see Rassmusen Reports for example).

All of these factors will be taken into consideration by the superdelegates, as far as I know. B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iceburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
40. Reasonable, and smart /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC