Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Came from a caucus tonight in Texas...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sykalla2 Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:49 AM
Original message
Came from a caucus tonight in Texas...
2 Elderly people fell over while waiting in line to sign in.

I am a 28 year old male, but I have to admit my feet were feeling pretty wobbly near the end.

The caucus itself took an extraordinarily short 15 minutes. However, the wait to sign in was almost 3 hours long!!!!

My wife couldn't come cuz she had to stay home to take care of our sick 6 month old.

Caucuses suck.

Everyone who doesn't have to caucus be very very very thankful. They are discriminatory in nature and favor a loud young or affluent demographic

Peace!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. My experience was almost identical
They had someone collapse and hauled off in an ambulance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sykalla2 Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. And not to mention.... I also had to rework my work schedule. *NT*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's lousy to tell thousands of people to show up at the same place at the same time.
I'm in favor of letting people vote from at least 7AM-8PM.

Get rid of "caucuses" which involve everyone showing up at once, which causes crowds and long lines and traffic jams.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks for doing this, and I hope you will write more tomorrow
when you can, to explain why it was so unsatisfactory. What does this mean, from a 52-year old white woman?

"favor a loud young or affluent demographic"

And what part of TX do you hail from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sykalla2 Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Explanation for your pleasure
Young/Affluent = Caucuses favor people who have less obligations in life. Having young kids is a KILLER. If you're affluent your schedule is more flexible than us working class people.

LOUD = pretty self-explanatory. The louder, more pushy the caucus-goers are, the better the candidate performs.

I hail from Tarrant County.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Thank you for explaining your impressions. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bongo Prophet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 03:55 AM
Response to Reply #11
33. I just ended up running a "caucus" in Tarrant County, because no one else would. Oy.
First off, I agree that it is a crappy system - we are in agreement on that -so I offer this as a personal experience, not argument.
So sorry to hear of the people collapsing!

In my precinct in a blue collar area of East Fort Worth, most were older and retired (about 60%) and ALL were working class, as far as I could tell.
How loud they were had NOTHING to do with their vote count - only made it harder to communicate.
How ORGANIZED they were had nothing to do with how the votes counted - only in how long it took.

If they could have been better informed and prepared, (and more quiet and patient) it would have ended in HALF the time, but the VOTE COUNT would have been the same. EXACTLY.

People lined up (we made one line for Clinton, and one for Obama) and show their vote card or other ID (which took longer to cross check, hence the value of preparation) and then they put down who they prefer. We told them to stay if they wanted to be a delegate, or they could leave otherwise if they wished. I got some folks from both camps to watch the counting and double check, because as democrats, we believe in fair counting above all.

Luckily, enough stayed to be delegates - Clinton had 9 and Obama 3.
If they had been louder, the numbers would not have changed.
The only thing that would hve changed is my already splitting headache!

I gave up my chair to a Clinton supporter (I am for Obama) so we would have one person on each side as chair and secretary, but still helped, and advised the chair in the rules to the best of my ability. We worked just fine together! I gave chairs to elderly and tried to allow them to go to the front , (with permission from others) and generally tried to make chaos and near riot into a fair and smooth process.


Once the Obama line went down, I took the mothers with children and elderly to the front of that line.

I understand your anger, and even share it - the election workers messed up big time, and the lack of organization was epidemic. But don't put that on any side, of make it a class thing or a noisy side thing. In a REAL caucus there can be more "convincing" but this was not like that - just getting them to be patient while folks were signing up was the challenge.

In my case,
The Obama supporters were patient in their line, there were only 15, so maybe that mattered?
In the Clinton line, there were a group of 8-10 or so cranky Hillary supporters, out of 50. They would occasionally shout "how much longer?!" The rest were quite polite. I passed on info down the line, as by this time my voice was going.

Anomalies:

The election judge gave Ms Prophet only half of the required packet, and it took awhile to get the rest, with the all important forms - and this really pissed off some in the line. (I tried to get them to sit in the bleachers, but they insisted on lining up. Again, attitude!)
One older guy was talking about "the Muslim" and looking at the Obama supporters suspiciously- one lady (I think it was the first guys wife) shook her fist at me, while we were still waiting for missing part of the packet, claiming I was just like a Republican, trying to steal their votes. I went down the line and told her that we were waiting on the proper paperwork, - that I came here only to vote, just like her - and offered to trade places if she wished. She did not. I told here that we would work together for a fair vote, both sides watching - and she could watch and maybe be a delegate. She just scowled and mumbled something. Maybe she thought I was a muslim? They were with a group of 6 feisty retiree "bubbas" and were kind of their own little "gang"- for a sec, I thought they might be some of the "Rush Limbaugh crossovers" because MOST of the folks were quite lovely. We had some interesting talk before the thing started.


The people that stayed to be delegates - 9 Clinton and 7 Obama, were ALL very nice, and we laughed about the chaos, and how we could all be delegates or alts(3 delegates/3 alts,in the Obama case) because everyone else just left. We also recognized each other from the library and so on. At that point "sides" did not matter. We were doing our public duty, and just relieved that is was almost over.

BIG props for our Clinton voting buddy. She helped us out in a crowd where 2 DUers for Obama were the ONLY ones there who had read up on the process, and we worked TOGETHER for democracy! We filled out the final paperwork together and then gave her a ride home afterward, and told her to give us a call if she needed a ride to the convention.

We all agreed that a simple primary would be SO much easier, as well as better dates for regional primaries, that the electoral college sucks and other byzantine structures should be revisited as to their worth in today's reality. So you are right about it being rough, though the VOTE COUNT was all above board and mutually agreed upon.

Aside from the impatient ones, we all got along fine - but no one had ever been to a caucus before, or at least for years - and that lack of knowledge made it more unwieldly than it needed to be, even under the current rules. Overall, it took 3 hours, and should have taken half that. Because of the chaos, sure - but also because of age, and the time it took to fill out the info, etc.

I would GLADLY vote for a better and simpler system!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. Absolutely. They Should Be Totally Done Away With.
They are grossly unfair and amateurish. It just doesn't make sense that they even exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skoods Donating Member (210 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. I don't get the whole Texas thing..
So people in essence got to vote twice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sykalla2 Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Yes. Twice. -- One vote litterally took 2 minutes & 1 took 3 hours. *NT*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skoods Donating Member (210 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. How?
Is that possible? Every other state gets one vote but Texas gets two?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sykalla2 Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Yes. 3/4 of delegates are proportioned according to primary results -- 1/4 from caucus *NT*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skoods Donating Member (210 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Oh, Texas
You're just oh so unique.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ctaylors6 Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #19
31. By the way, the Rs in TX don't caucus at all. Just vote. And they had no lines today.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. they had some kind of meeting though
about 5 of them showed up at my caucus, did whatever it was they do & then split pronto.

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCollar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. In simplest terms
2/3 of the delegates come from the popular vote...The remaining 1/3 are elected through a caucus process. First at the precinct level to the Senate District Conventio. Then the process is repeated to the State convention...from there the delegates are all elected to the national convention.

It gives a grass roots opportunity to the precinct level voters to be delegates...it's cumbersome but let's us little people work our way in to the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. "However, the wait to sign in was almost 3 hours long!"
And that, people, is why many working class individuals don't go to caucuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. They only really favor a select demographic - people who don't work
and have transportation. It seems to me that they could really be a good place for someone to pull some Rovian tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. What? BS
Not everyone works night shift and you can get a ride from a friend. So it takes 3 hours...once every 4 years. Sorry, I have no sympathy for that complaint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
24. What about the ones that collapse from exhaustion? They don't count? Don't deserve to have their
voice heard? What about those who don't have friends with cars because they're just as poor? They don't count? What about those who CAN'T get out of work? They don't count? What about the single moms who don't have someone to watch the kids or for that matter, the sitter? They don't count?

That POV sucks ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sykalla2 Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. No sense in arguing with these people. They don't even want a revote in Florida and Michigan. *NT*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 04:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
34. Voting in an election should NOT be like running a marathon.
It should be so easy and pleasant that everyone has a positive experience so they will participate again next time around.

Unless you think only the dedicated view should have their voices heard? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCollar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. disagree
been here since 1991 and it works if you make the effort
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moobu2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
10. Thank goodness all we have to do is go vote
Takes about 2 minutes and I’m back in my car.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
citizen snips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
12. agreed
I am glad my state is a primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ctaylors6 Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
15. I hear ya. Hated caucus. It is only once every 4 years but so is voting. Just let us vote.
Seemed particularly stupid after so many days of early voting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
21. I agree
I like the idea of caucuses encouraging a civil debate and discussion about politics, but at this point there will be little if any of that. I can't imagine Obama and Hillary supporters actually civilly debating anything now.

And anyone that cannot get the night off, is ill, is serving in the military, is traveling, or for some reason or the other can't make it to some room for a certain amount of time in a small window on a certain day of the week, will not have their voice heard.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
22. I guess it depends on the size of the crowd
I had fun. Nobody was playing silly games tonight. We were too damned thrilled there so many Democrats there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
23. That's DISGRACEFUL. They should have chairs for the elderly.
Human beings shouldn't have to go through that to have their voice heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sykalla2 Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Yeah, like I sad my feet were wobbly and I'm 28, I could only imagine... *NT*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
26. Exactly. They need to be retired. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sailing Donating Member (196 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
27. At our precinct...
The elderly and those with children were sent to the head of the line to get them through quicker. A very good decision. And there was not one complaint about it. Everyone was quite patient tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
28. Haven't they traditionally favored the retired?
Seems like a nightmare though. I can't imagine what purpose they serve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
egarcia76 Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
30. Houston-area caucus observations
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 01:30 AM by egarcia76
From what I've seen on the news, I guess we lucked out. I live in a suburb of Houston (Missouri City, Fort Bend County), but my precinct is very small. We were out in about an hour. The neighboring precinct (who, inexplicably, voted in the same place as us) was absolute pandemonium ... 200+ people standing and waiting around for hours, their kids seated on the floor doing homework or watching movies on portable DVDs. My community is overwhelmingly African American, and my partner and I comprised two out of the 3 Hillary supporters in our precinct compared with about 30 Obama supporters. But everyone seemed to be in good spirits and we were home in time to flip on CNN at 9:15. The other precinct? Not so lucky. They were still signing people in when we left. The actual delegate counting, I'm sure, took them a good while. What a mess ... just like TX to do things in a weird way. Looks like Obama will win the caucuses.

Elisa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ctaylors6 Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
32. Just saw on news that people still waiting in lines to caucus in Arlington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC