Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Radio Caller called it on Farrakhan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 11:04 AM
Original message
Radio Caller called it on Farrakhan
The radio caler said this...How can they link Farrakhan to the KKK's behaviour. Can people name one lynching by the nation of islam. On er just teh one. The entity nation of islam not islam as a whole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. No lynchings
that we know of, just very vile words and veiled threats.

Left of Cool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The "Nation of Islam" -
Edited on Thu Feb-28-08 11:15 AM by gateley
I heard a lawmaker say once, "well, Mohammad isn't MY God" --

And I thought, uh, he isn't OBL's God, either... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. Does the assassination of Malcolm X count?
Revisiting the Malcolm X Assassination
By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, AlterNet. Posted February 23, 2005.

The whitewash of the issues and even mystery that often surround the murder of a popular, but controversial, leader always raises questions and doubts, no matter how many years pass.

More:
http://www.alternet.org/columnists/story/21334/


also:



NEWS RELEASE

01/17/95

CONTACT: Stanford University News Service (415) 723-2558
Farrakhan helped build climate for Malcolm X's death, historian says

STANFORD -- The daughter of Malcolm X, who was charged Jan. 12 with trying to hire a hit man to kill Louis Farrakhan, minister of the Nation of Islam, came from a family that "resented Farrakhan and had good reason to because he was one of those in the Nation responsible for the climate of vilification that resulted in Malcolm X's assassination," Stanford historian Clayborne Carson said Friday, Jan. 13.

Carson, the author of the 1991 book Malcolm X: The FBI File, as well as other histories of the civil rights era, said the growing respect given to Farrakhan by some African Americans may have prompted members of Malcolm X's family within the last year to begin publicly accusing the Muslim minister of involvement in Malcolm's 1965 murder, Carson said.

On Jan. 12, federal authorities in Minneapolis arrested Quibilah Bahiya Shabazz for allegedly trying to hire a hit man to kill her father's former disciple-turned-rival. Her court-appointed public defender, Scott Tilsen, told reporters she had been "set up" by authorities and a childhood friend, the man who was supposed to assassinate Farrakhan. Shabazz was 4 years old when she watched her father die in a hail of gunfire in a Harlem ballroom.

Carson said he did not know Quibilah Shabazz personally but "I understand that the family has been upset that no one has really called Farrakhan to account for his responsibility" in Malcolm X's death.

Farrakhan "has become respected in large segments of the black community, and you even have the irony of him being invited to speak at Malcolm X commemoration events."

"But that's not to say that the family would take matters into their own hands,² Carson said. "You never know what the government might have had hanging over head. He may have entrapped her, knowing how much she resented Louis Farrakhan. After all, as a little girl, she had witnessed the assassination of her father."

Carson said that "for many young people, Louis Farrakhan is the modern-day Malcolm X, and many of his followers are incapable of distinguishing what he is saying now from what Malcolm X said after he left the Nation of Islam. That may be partly because Spike Lee's recent movie on Malcolm X did not focus on his political differences with the Nation of Islam and its then leader, Elijah Muhammad.²

During the last year of his life and after breaking with the Nation of Islam, "Malcolm was moving from militant rhetoric to militant politics," Carson said. "Muhammad did not want followers to vote or participate in politics in other ways, such as marching in civil rights demonstrations..

Malcolm X recruited Louis Farrakhan into the Nation of Islam in the 1950s, Carson said, and Farrakhan, then known as Louis X, was a protégé of Malcolm's until Malcolm broke with Muhammad. In the Muslim newspaper, Muhammad Speaks, Farrakhan condemned Malcolm for his efforts to establish ties with civil rights groups. He wrote also that "the die is set, and Malcolm shall not escape, especially after such evil foolish talk about his benefactor, Elijah Muhammad. Such a man as Malcolm is worthy of death."

"I think Malcolm himself knew that his former colleagues wanted to see him dead," Carson said. "The question is not whether they wanted to see him dead, but whether they actually ordered the assassination. Within the context of the Nation of Islam, there was no need to do it. If you label somebody as an enemy of your religion, then the strongest believers are going to believe that is an invitation to take matters into their own hands. It didn't have to come down as an order. Farrakhan would not have had to order the assassination. All he had to do was identify Malcolm as a traitor."

The Nation of Islam no longer totally rejects political involvement, he said, but the group is far from the political direction of Malcolm's final year. "When you strip away anti-white invective, what you really have from Farrakhan today is just an updating of Booker T. Washington. There is nothing that would not fit in with the Republican Party platform. It¹s pull-yourself-up-by-your-bootstraps. He's considered a militant, because he says things that become controversial, but his program is anything but radical."

Carson, professor of history, is also the editor of the Martin Luther King Jr. Papers Project. Volume II of King's papers, Rediscovering Precious Values, was published in November by the University of California Press. The first volume covers King's youth and the second covers his graduate school years and his first year as a minister.

-kpo-

950117Arc5411.html

This is an archived release.

This release is not available in any other form. Images mentioned in this release are not available online.
Stanford News Service has an extensive library of images, some of which may be available to you online. Direct your request by EMail to images@news-service.stanford.edu.

© Stanford University. All Rights Reserved. Stanford, CA 94305. (650) 723-2300. Terms of Use | Copyright Complaints
http://news-service.stanford.edu/pr/95/950117Arc5411.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Obama went to the Million Man March how come Russert didn't ask him about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. Perhaps the caller missed last weeks 60 minutes, where they were
discussing the assination of a reporter by a group tied to the nation of Islam

The leader of that group also had some other behaviors that were not particularly positive either

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC