Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

fyi - Obama still needs 731 delegates to secure the nom. Hillary needs 807.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:38 AM
Original message
fyi - Obama still needs 731 delegates to secure the nom. Hillary needs 807.
Edited on Wed Feb-20-08 11:55 AM by pirhana
This contest is not over.

Should Hillary continue to lose - then yes - it will be over.

But as of today, we stil have a long way to go.

edit to add where I got the numbers from -
It was from my paper, which is unfortunate because what they have online is not the same as what they have in print. BUT this is what they have online:

The Illinois senator's Wisconsin victory left him with 1,303 delegates in The Associated Press' count, compared with 1,233 for Clinton.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CAMPAIGN_RDP?SITE=AZMES&SECTION=NATIONAL&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
Basically the same margin.


Double edit - color me embarrassed, I posted the numbers backwards.
Freudian slip?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Its still a close race
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
45. Technically, perhaps
but she's been blown out of the water in the last 10 races. She's lost by at least 17%. Her campaign is on life support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. where the hell did you get those numbers from? he is ahead by 160 pledged and even with SD leads by
Edited on Wed Feb-20-08 11:40 AM by Johnny__Motown
about 80
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I was wondering the same thing
Perhaps the OP has the numbers mixed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. Pirhana, Hillary supporter here. Where did you get the numbers?
Thanks!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. I still have CNN's up:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. ha - that's even closer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #21
35. Care to explain your numbers?
Magic numbers - 2025

CNN numbers for Obama: 1315 - Remaining number: 710.

CNN numbers for Clinton": 1245 - Remaining number 780.

Obama is AHEAD and NEEDS LESS DELEGATES, not more.

This said, if you consider pledged delegates: Obama is about 170 ahead (CNN numbers).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. I was just looking at the numbers at CNN and NYT
It's definitely do-able. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:50 AM
Original message
she needs 58% of all remaining pledged to catch up, 65% if you assume she will lose some states
not realistic to assume she can do that unless Barack makes a major gaff in one of the debates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
30. double post sorry
Edited on Wed Feb-20-08 11:52 AM by Johnny__Motown
had an error report and made another similar post. my bad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knowledgeispwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. How do those numbers make sense?
Obama is leading in number of delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. Well they don't. And they ignore the fact that super delegates can still switch.
Obama's super delegate pledges are bound to sky rocket this week as many will want to climb on board before the nomination is sewn up. Holding out too long reduces political capital for the hold outs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
8. Fuzzy math?
Long way to go? For Hillary, yes, she's got to pull off a miracle to win this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. Um... even including SUPERDELEGATES... Obama is up by a count of...
1354 to 1263

(realclearpolitics.com)



2025 are needed.




Obama therefore needs only 671. Hillary needs 762.



Math much?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDoorbellRang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
44. The problem is that every source seems to figure it differently
Here's CNN's take on it

1,315 Obama 1,245Clinton
1,154Pledged 1,011Pledged
161Superdels 234Superdels

Needed to Win: 2,025

And I know the NYT figures it differently than everyone else.

I've been keeping an individual state tally from the cnn site, and their own tally doesn't add up to what their total shows, so I think they may be talking out of their hats. I'm beginning to think the only way to get a correct count is to go to each state's democratic party headquarters online and get the total there. Very frustrating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. It's not over until DelegateHub says so
A healthy approach to winning in November right there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Araxen Donating Member (826 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. I didn't major in math, I majored in miracles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #11
27. right, now we have Huckabee and Hillabee n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
12. Good. I'd hate to live through four years of a McCain presidency. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
13. Obama is ahead of Clinton FYI. Your numbers are obviously flawed.
Even with superdelegates, Obama is ahead approximately 80.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
14. But you raise an interesting scenario..
I would guess that Bill Clinton and Hillary are on the phone and talking to several dozen SD's in attempting to get them to come out now in support of Hillary so they can make the delegate count much closer and give the Hillary supporters hope that this nomination is still possible. Look for a dramatic increase in Hillary SD votes in the next few days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
15. I call bullshit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
16. The truth is the race is TOO CLOSE TO CALL, the truth is also
Edited on Wed Feb-20-08 11:47 AM by still_one
that no matter who are nominee is, WE WILL WIN

mccain represents an extension of the bush policies, and people have had enough



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
17. Not only can pirhana not properly spell his username (the word is "piranha"), he can't do math...
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #17
31. let me remind you of


something. making fun of peoples chosen screen names is against the rules.
I would edit your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
43. You are probably one of the rudest people on this board.
Pirhana is spelled that way on purpose - it's from something personal, and funny to members in my family.

Why is it your business anyway????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlertLurker Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
18. Obama needs 871, Clinton 1014.
Counting currently "pledged" superdelegates, Obama needs 710, Clinton needs 780.


I have no idea where your numbers came from, but they seem incorrect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #18
28. The link is in the op.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #28
36. And your link shows you are wrong!
*YOUR* link shows Obama ahead of Clinton in delegates.


Your OP says that Hillary is ahead.



Sheesh... you're posting links that prove you are wrong!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #28
39. Did you read it?
from your link


The Illinois senator's Wisconsin victory left him with 1,303 delegates in The Associated Press' count, compared with 1,233 for Clinton, a margin that masks his 145-delegate lead among those picked in primaries or caucuses. It takes 2,025 to win the nomination at the party's national convention in Denver. Allocation of the 20 Hawaii delegates was not being calculated until later Wednesday.




1303 Obama
1233 Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #28
40. You may want to explain your math. Because Obama needs less new delegates than Clinton, not more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
19. I want some of whatever you're taking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Kool aid isn't that hard to get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUyellow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
22. post and run
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. I'm right here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. So post the source for your numbers....
...not a single source shows Hillary ahead in the delegate count. Not one.


Post a link, or STFU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. Hey -tt - did you not READ my entire post?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #32
38. Yes! Your subject says that Hillary needs LESS... your link says that she needs MORE than Obama...
...are you that dense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #32
41. OK, I see you have corrected your OP.
Edited on Wed Feb-20-08 11:58 AM by Mass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. Of course! Facts don't matter to these people....
...pirhana obviously can't back up his numbers.... so he doesn't return to the thread.... even to answer the questions from fellow Hillary supporters.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
24. Thanks---no it is not over
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
33. So, Obama has more delegates, and requires more to win. Gotcha.
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #33
42. I fixed it, posted backwards.
yes I feel stupid :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
34. HELLO? 1303 is MORE than 1233.....
.... your OP says that Obama needs more than Clinton....

..yet you post numbers showing that Obama needs LESS!


Can you not even read your own links?


Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
37. Not when more super delegaes switch sides.
More super delegates will leave her when its clear that she won't win and needs to drop out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #37
46. I will wait and see rather than making ASSumptions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. I believe she lost 5 in the last week. not an assumption (although the count varies)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. HERE IS AN ASSUMPTION FOR YA.............


http://www.politickernj.com/two-nj-supedelegates-go-obama-16541

2 more switched today, that should be 7 lost in 8 days
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. thanks for keeping track. The race is on--have a good day
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. Its already happening.
No need to wait and see. They're already switching. I guess you can blind yourself to what you don't want to see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC