Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Times (UK): "Right slams Obama as 'shady Chicago socialist'"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bidenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 02:56 AM
Original message
Times (UK): "Right slams Obama as 'shady Chicago socialist'"
A taste of things to come:



February 17, 2008
Right slams Obama as 'shady Chicago socialist'
Republicans are out to crush Barack by painting him as a leftwinger with dubious support
Sarah Baxter


Leading Republicans believe they can trounce Barack Obama in the presidential election by tarring him as a shady Chicago socialist. They are increasingly confident that his campaign could collapse by the time their attack machine has finished with him. Grover Norquist, an influential conservative tax reform lobbyist, said: “Barack Obama has been able to create his own image and introduce himself to voters, but the swing voters in a general election are not paying attention yet. He is open to being defined as a leftwing, corrupt Chicago politician.”...

Obama has the voting record of a “hard-left” socialist, according to Norquist, from his time in the Illinois state legislature to the US Senate. He was recently judged by the nonpartisan National Journal to have the most liberal voting record in 2007 of any senator. “It will be easy to portray him as even harder-left than Hillary,” said Norquist. “Hillary could lose the election, but Obama could collapse. People already know Hillary and she is not popular, but the disadvantage for Obama is that Republicans can teach people who don’t know him who he is.”

Newt Gingrich, the former Speaker of the House and Republican guru, recently described Obama as the “most leftwing candidate to run since George McGovern” – a reference to the anti-Vietnam-war Democrat who lost 49 states out of 50 to Richard Nixon in the 1972 election. Norquist believes Obama’s questionable Chicago connections will stir things further...

More: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article3382313.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=2015164
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. He's a socialist.
He's a Republican.

I wish people would make up their minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yuk! I thought you were gone!
Sound sexy to me! A "Shady Chicago Socialist"....or simply a Liberal! What's new? :shrug:

Let them know that we will call McCain, the Manchurian Candidate!

Sounds even.

Next!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Yes, Corruption is so delightful!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bidenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 03:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. i remain
Sorry to disappoint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. HE'S NOT BLACK ENOUGH!!!
:boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. HE'S BLACK!
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 03:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. Oh noes...I think I peed my pants
Grover Norquist...the guy who compared the estate tax to the holocaust and is in bed with the Caouncil on American Islamic Relations (in other words, the anti-Muslim conservatives don't trust word one out of his mouth). Co-author of the contract with America with Newt Gingrich. I think we can handle that.

Let's see, a week ago you were arguing that Obama gets a free ride because they're trying to lure him in. Now you're worried because they're attacking him as front runner. I am so not worried about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Nobody reads the UK newspapers or they'd know about Sibel Edmonds
and a whole host of other stuff.

The US press is giving Obama a free ride (setting him up), but the Pukes won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. I think plenty of people read the UK papers...
though I might note that the Times is owned Rupert 'Fox News' Murdoch, and is hardly a bastion of objective commentary these days. I like The Economist myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
9. lol oooooh theyre calling him a socialist. scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. We better pack up and go hide in the woods!
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
11. I'm not too worried about it. Most Republicans couldn't find Chicago
on a map carpooling with Rand McNally.

And Republicans are struggling with definitions of late as well. "Christian" seemed to elude them, for example, as the shock-and-awe bombs fall on Baghdad. So I'm not worried about "Socialist."

As for shady, there's a pretty long grocery list of Republicans who don't pass the smell test on that count.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
12. A taste of things to come (hopefully):
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bidenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 03:55 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. why?
You have an "ignore" option, and a "hide thread" option. If my threads are too challenging for you, feel free to use either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
14. Yeeeaaaah see! We're going to put the means of production under proletarian control, tough guy.
This'll be done by the workers' councils and don't try any monkey business or we'll plug ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
16. Newt Gingrich...God how I hate that obscene juvenile fuck.
Here's to the day his sick ticker explodes.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 04:46 AM
Response to Original message
17. What has he nationalized? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmudem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
18. Republicans think anyone with a D next to their name
is the reincarnation of Vladimir Lenin. Why are you posting this right-wing garbage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
19. We knew this was coming.
Fox is just beginning to bring these stories out as they now believe that BO will be the nominee. Hold on to your horses, maties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
20. If only
He's no socialist. I'm a socialist and to have such an erudite and capable politician among the ranks of socialism. Sigh, he's no socialist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC