|
The Senate voted on banning these horrifying weapons. Obama voted to ban them; Clinton voted against banning them.
You know what cluster bombs are, don't you? Those thousands and thousands of little ball-like weapons showered on Lebanon by the Israelis, and still maiming and killing civilians, including many children in Lebanon and other countries in which they were used.
Most are familiar with the work Princess Diana did to publicize the horrific injuries these weapons inflicted upon civilians, women, children, and how they continue to kill and maim long after a military conflict has been officially resolved. Those painted bright yellow particularly attract kids to pick them up. Would your grandchild pick up a pretty yellow ball if he found one? Some interpret Clinton's vote against banning these inhumane weapons as an attempt to look militarily tough enough to lead a nation at war; others - particularly my Manhattan liberal (truly bona fide leftist) friends said the vote was more to keep from offending Clinton's pro-Israeli constituents/donors.
I'm politically active - personally and professionally. I understand that concessions must be made and triangulations are needed to win office. BUT EVERYONE SHOULD HAVE A MORAL LINE OVER WHICH THEY WILL NOT STEP - A COMPROMISE TOO FAR, SO TO SPEAK.
Add to that thought the fact that many have said they support Clinton for her work for women and children. Speaking as a woman and as a mother, let alone as a human being, and I am dead serious about this, I would cut off my hand before I pushed the button voting against a ban on these weapons.
If she wins the nomination, I will vote for her. But at the deepest emotional and psychological level, I no longer respect her. A big talking point for Clinton supporters here on DU is "I support her for all the work she's done for women and children." I don't ever want to hear that crap claim again about someone who voted to support the continued use of cluster bombs in civilian areas. How any human being, how any woman, how any mother could vote in favor of those weapons, which have been condemned by the civilized world - leaves me stunned. It tells me that Senator Clinton has as cold and calculating a heart as I have ever heard of in an American politician.
Consider the actions of Princess Diana. www.guardian.co.uk/society/gallery/2007/ju... When Princess Diana tiptoed through a minefield she created an iconic image and helped secure a ban on the weapons, which had killed and maimed thousands. Now campaigners are working with her memorial charity to press for a ban on landmines’ successors, which are wreaking new devastation. Landmine Action say Diana’s name still opens doors worldwide and they hope her legacy will help them secure a ban on cluster bombs - which are wrecking lives in southern Lebanon a year after the war with Israel ended. Unexploded bombs have killed 249 people since the war ended and have left large swathes of the country a no-go area.
|