Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary, Will You Renounce Your Ties to Monsanto?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:49 PM
Original message
Hillary, Will You Renounce Your Ties to Monsanto?
Hillary, Will You Renounce Your Ties to Monsanto?

By Linn Cohen-Cole

Dear Hillary,

By polling logic, I should be your supporter -- Democrat, woman, white, liberal. But this past summer I saw a News Hour show on farmers committing suicide in Maharastra, India, which affected me deeply. I started learning what was happening to farmers and to food and how the Clintons are connected.

...

"Genetic Engineering is often justified as a human technology, one that feeds more people with better food. Nothing could be further from the truth. With very few exceptions, the whole point of genetic engineering is to increase sales of chemicals and bio-engineered products to dependent farmers."

David Ehrenfield: Professor of Biology, Rutgers University.


Monsanto has a $10 million budget and 75 person staff to prosecute farmers.

Since the late 1990s (as industrial agriculture took hold in India),166,000 Indian farmers have committed suicide and 8 million have left the land (P. Sainath, The Hindu). Farmers in Europe, Asia, Africa, Indonesia, South America, Central America and here, have all protested Monsanto and genetic engineering.

What does this have to do with you?

Your Orwellian-named "Rural Americans for Hillary" were Monsanto's lobbyists. My greater concern, though, is you former-employer, Rose Law Firm, representing Monsanto, world's largest GE (GE - genetic engineering) corporation; Tyson, world's largest meat producer; Walmart, the world's largest retailer. Rose is home to Industrial FOOD.

...

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19320.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
libertee Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow..I hope you can sleep in spite of all of this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I knew it. An attorney doing her job legally representing clients. Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Do you
remember how many Monsanto, ex-Monsanto higher ups found their way into the Clinton Administration.

Should we do a list?

Of course this is standard practice in the Beltway Revolving Door and it's corrupt beyond redemption.

Remember Michael Taylor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I know there were a slew of southern brothers in the Carter admin. and
of course * has had his fair share of Texans. Come to think of it, FDR had his fair share of easterners and JFK never could have found another attorney general other than his brother.

Its part of the American political scene. Until its deemed illegal, Clinton is merely following a time honored tradition. Not my preference to be sure, but its hardly anything new to use one's cronies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. While I Consider Anything From Info Clearing House to Be Dubious
Edited on Mon Feb-11-08 09:57 PM by Crisco
I have no problem with the idea of a letter-writing campaign to encourage HRC to throw Monsanto under the bus if she's friendly towards them. I wouldn't expect her to do this publicly, but would hope she would at least do so in such a way someone else could take credit for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. try this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. There's not enough paper to write a letter about each corporation to which she's beholden.
And I doubt that Monsanto is her worst offense.

Were she (or Obama) to write off the corporations, they'd have to address the actual concerns of working Americans. Neither one has trained for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Monsanto's not only driving Indian farmers to desperation, but also small American farmers as well
Let's say some of their GM corn pollinates the regular corn of the farmer next door. Not only does Monsanto swoop in and seize that farmer's entire crop, claiming patent violations, but they do so without any sort of compensation. For many small farmers, losing an entire crop can mean losing their farm.

Sounds like Hillary is not the small farmer's friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. You're kidding! Can you provide more details about crop seizures?
I would think the farmers involved would have at least as much a claim against Monsanto for contaminating their non-GMO corn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Here ya go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. You woud think that Monsanto would be trying to cover up the fact that
its GMO crops are going feral, wouldn't you?

By the way:

Barack Obama's Plan
Encourage Organic and Local Agriculture: Obama will help organic farmers afford to certify their crops and reform crop insurance to not penalize organic farmers. He also will promote regional food systems.


http://www.barackobama.com/issues/rural/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. You would think, but the arrogance of large corporations.
Interesting plan by Obama, however they really need to completely redo organic standards. Once again, those were written with Big Ag in mind, and frankly a lot of what they allow under the rubric of "organic" I wouldn't use on a dead dill weed. Too many chemicals allowed, tailored too much for large farmers.

That's why I generally look for not only heirloom crops, but also Certified Naturally Grown <http://www.naturallygrown.org/> I also get to know where my food comes from, one of the attractions of a farmer's market. I also live out in the country myself, so I grow much of my own produce, freeze and can it. I also get to know my meat, my neighbors raise organic free range cattle, hogs and chickens. Hell, I just put in an order for a quarter cow that was walking my back pasture a couple of months ago. Get to know some farmers, folks out in the country, get to know where your food comes from. It's cheaper, tastier and better for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Given Her Most Trusted Non-Husband Advisor, I Doubt It
Mark Penn is up to dollar signs in evil clients.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hillary, Will You Renounce Satan?
Sorry, I couldn't resist quoting that line from The Godfather. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. Monsanto is pure evil.
K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. but they held a fundraiser for her: "Rural Americans for Hillary"
Yee-haw

October 18, 2007 10:06 AM

So later this month, according to THIS INVITATION, the presidential campaign of Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, is holding a "Rural Americans for Hillary" lunch and campaign briefing at the end of this month….

..but she's holding it in Washington, DC….

…at a lobbying firm…

… and specifically, though it's not mentioned in the invitation, at the lobbying firm Troutman Sanders Public Affairs…

…which just so happens to lobby for the controversial multinational agri-biotech Monsanto.

You read that right: Monsanto, about which there are serious questions about its culpability regarding 56 Superfund Sites,wanton and "outrageous" pollution, and the decidedly unkosher (and quite metaphoric) genetically-bred "Superpig."

-snip

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2007/10/yee-haw.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. That should be a post in itself. Thanks for the link. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
16. Obama will you renouse your major campaign advisor a Monsanto lobbyist?
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 07:06 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. just what I thought....no answer ....crickets
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. He certainly should if that's true. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
20. One of the reasons that I didn't understand some Edwards supporters switching to Hillary.
While John Edwards was in rural Iowa yesterday talking about his plans to help family farmers, the Clinton campaign was in Washington, DC planning an event with the lobbyists from the biggest corporate agriculture company in the world. The difference between John Edwards and Hillary Clinton could not be more clear. Here’s some news for the Clinton campaign, when folks in rural Iowa talk about the problems with hog lots, they don't mean parking lots on K Street.

“John Edwards believes family-owned farms are critical to America’s future and that the corporate greed that’s killing the family farm is hurting America. Apparently, Hillary Clinton doesn’t feel the same way. While John Edwards has introduced policies to ensure family farmers can compete against big agribusiness, protect the food we eat and preserve farming communities, Hillary Clinton, beholden to Washington lobbyists, is tailoring her rural policy to reflect the needs of big agribusiness. While corporate America and lobbyists may want someone like Clinton in the White House, regular Americans are ready for someone who will stand up for them and fight for real change.”


Monsanto. A company that the website http://www.ethicalinvesting.com/monsanto/">"Ethical Investing" labels "the world's most unethical and harmful investment."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC