|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 10:08 PM Original message |
The WA caucuses represent 1% of the population of that state. NE represent 2% of that state. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 10:09 PM Response to Original message |
1. Um, I think Washington's numbers are in terms of delegates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 10:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. So what are the actual numbers for WA, then? Is it better than 2%? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 10:15 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Not sure where to find that out. I had heard that 32% is what they were expecting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
2. Look at the number of people who vote in primaries as compared to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
3. Look at the number of people who vote in primaries as compared to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
4. I guess it's only disturbing if your candidate didn't win that measly 2%. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prayingforrain48 (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
5. which numbers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
6. Kinda like the Moveon "vote" - no wait, that was 10% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
7. Those are delegates, not voters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 10:16 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. I know NE's are voters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 10:19 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Nebraska is delegates too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
9. Alaska? We had over 8,000 people caucus for Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woolldog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
10. josh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 10:14 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Give what up? I already expect Hillary to lose. Can I not make an observation about the process? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
13. I do not care. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beregond2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
14. Caucuses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
15. Um, Washington and Nebraska report delegates, not caucusers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 10:17 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. So NE's caucuses are tiered? Are you sure of that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
New Dawn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
18. Well I thought the caucus was much cooler than a primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StoryTeller (768 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
20. This is Nebraska's first caucus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
21. C'mon... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC