Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What States Can Dean Deliver that Gore Lost in 2004?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
deminflorida Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 08:51 PM
Original message
What States Can Dean Deliver that Gore Lost in 2004?
Good Question being asked in South Carolina?

"There is no doubt Howard Dean has struck a chord with a significant chunk of the Democratic base, but how that translates into enough electoral votes to win the White House remains problematic. One question I put to the campaigns of some Democratic hopefuls is that assuming the election is as close as in 2000, what states can your candidate win that Al Gore lost? The Dean people don’t want to answer this question yet, stating their belief that Gov. Dean will run hard in all states."

http://www.ydsc.org/index.php?option=articles&task=viewarticle&artid=9&Itemid=3

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ithacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. West Virginia
Gore lost because of guns. Dean won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminflorida Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I Agree with that one....
If he takes the campaign to the outdoors shows....fishing, etc...

He could do well in the South...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
29. WV, TN, and CO on the gun issue alone...


He might take MO as well on guns.

He'd likely take NH too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Josh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #29
35. Dean will not win ANYTHING on guns alone -
people who vote with their guns in mind already have a candidate. His name is George W. Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ldoolin Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #35
53. See my reply below...
...because it applies to your post too.

Many of the people who have crossed over and voted Republican lately over the gun issue are lifelong Democrats who have a legitimate fear that some in the Democratic Party have universal gun confiscation or registration as a goal.

We can prove to them that their fears are ungrounded, and win them back to the Democratic ticket, by nominating a presidential candidate who has stated that he will draw the line at any significant new federal gun laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Josh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. You could be right
I remained worried, nevertheless that Dean cannot compete in many states that Gore *won*.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #29
41. Typical self-connivance from Dean supporters
This is one reason why Northeastern liberal intellectuals are not trusted and often disliked in Flyover Country (as discussed in another thread). The temerity it takes to suggest that Dean can win over moderate voters just because he has a right wing opinion on this one issue--a viewpoint that he shares with Bush, by the way--is not just absurd. It's dismissive of the intelligence of all voters in the states mentioned (West Virginia, Tennessee, and Colorado).

The reasons we lose in these states are diverse and deal with a broad range of cultural issues where the Republicans are trusted and the Democrats are not. For Dean's people (not Dean, btw, just his more arrogant supporters) to think they can win votes by tossing a few ideological pennies to the peasants as his carriage splashes past them is crude and numbskulled. This only reinforces the perception that Dean will tank and tank badly in the general election.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ldoolin Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #41
51. You apparently don't live in any of those states
Edited on Fri Dec-19-03 05:47 PM by ldoolin
I watched rural counties in 2000 that were considered safely Democratic vote for Bush, in one case the very first ever that county went R. Ever. I'm talking about a county that voted for McGovern in 72, Carter in 80, Mondale in 84, Dukakis in 88 - and Bush in 2000. Signs like "Vote Bush Or Register Guns" were a common sight.

The perception, deserved or not, was that Al Gore wanted to push for universal gun registration. Blue collar Democrats in rural areas alienated by the Democratic Party's pandering to the Sarah Brady group crossed over and voted for Bush. That combined with Gore's alienating many liberals with his free trade, "New Democrat" views which led to some defecting to Nader, sank us. Gore lost.

Anyone who thinks these blue-collar Democrats aren't going to come *back* to the Democratic ticket once we nominate somebody who has clearly stated that he will draw the line on any new gun laws, is deluded. Anyone who thinks that the Nader voters aren't going to come back to the Democratic ticket once we nominate somebody who is unafraid to stand up against Bush's Iraq war and criticize the Patriot Act, is also deluded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. Winning WV back where it belongs will not do it alone
and those same signs this year will say: "Vote Bush or register Marriage"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ldoolin Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. WV alone...
...would have put Gore over the top in 2000 and made Florida irrelevant.

Had the gun issue not been a big turn-off, we might easily have also won: Tennessee, Nevada, Arizona, and New Hampshire.

That comment about registering marraige doesn't rate a response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phelan Donating Member (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #29
46. Gore is from TN and he didn't carry it
There is a real southern mistrust of yankees that he would have to work through
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
42. Dean will lose WV on fake issue of "Gay Marriage" & real issue of taxes
Dean will pick up New Hampshire. But I can see him costing us Iowa, Minnesota, New Mexico, and possibly Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. Dean's only hope for victory is a total Bush Administration melt down. That's one hell of a gamble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Northwind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. All of them.
'Nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmaier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Actually
That isn't enough said. How to get the electoral outcome is pretty much what this is ALL about.

West Virginia is a possibility (4 votes).
New Hampshire is a possibility (5 votes).

Assuming he carries the states Gore carried that still leaves him 1 vote shy and I just can't find it. If he can REALLY mobilize blue collar union & urban votes then Ohio is a possibility and that would carry the victory (20 votes).

My other concern is that he will have a challenge carrying a few of the states which Gore actually won but in very, very tight matchups, notably Wisconsin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ferg Donating Member (873 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. WI, MN, OR, WA should be shoe-ins for Dean
Unlike Gore. That's one of the advantages Dean will have over the Gore campaign.

That leaves Dean with more time to deal with the marginal states.

I'd say the main pickups would be WV, NH, AZ and NV.

I don't know enough about OH to say, though it would be a great pickup.

Another advantage Dean will have is the grassroots campaign should make a number of states like VA, AK, and CO interesting without forcing Dean himself to spend too much time/money there.

I'm not mentioning FL because the combination of Dibold/Choicepoint fraud means that Jeb will deliver the state no matter what kind of a majority the Democrat gets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminflorida Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Nope, I disagree,
Florida is a huge battle ground state...with Bob Graham not having to defend his seat in the Senate, he'll be supporting the Dem candidate tooth and nail, Don't kid yourself...he is huge in this state as far as popularity and respect goes.

Bill Mcbride the guy that ran against Jeb Bush in 2002 is a very, very good Tampa lawyer, and you can bet his eye is on Jeb this time. The republicans are going to be under a microscope down here, and the possiblity of being gang-raped in a state prison doesn't sit too well with them. I don't think your going to see too many hands in the cookie jar this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ferg Donating Member (873 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. FL: hope you're right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ldoolin Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
56. pickups
I'd say the main pickups would be WV, NH, AZ and NV.

These are the exact same four states I'm thinking, plus Florida especially if Bob Graham is on the ticket. I can't honestly see the Repukes picking up any states that went for Gore in 2000. I suspect the gay marraige non-issue might put a few borderline states like Tennessee and Louisiana more firmly in the R column, but those states were in the R column in 2000 to begin with. Assuming Nader doesn't run, Wisconsin, Minnesota, New Mexico, and Oregon will be more firmly in the D column than in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graelent Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Nevada
Nevada is still very angry about Bush lying about not moving forward with the Yucca Mountain Nuclear depository.

This will be a campaign issue and could convert Nevada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. Really?Dean Tried Shipping Nuclear Waste To Sierra Blanca
Texas....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Dean hurt himself in the south with that Flag comment.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminflorida Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I Don't Think So...
I heard several Black Leaders in S.C. this morning talking on NPR. They say it was an oversight, and it was just Dean being honest about how important it was to reach out to white southern males with gun-racks in their trucks as well as blacks in the south.

Check it out at NPR.ORG, but you'll have to pay for the transcript.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I listen to NPR in the morning and I heard it, but I don't believe it
Edited on Thu Dec-18-03 09:28 PM by billbuckhead
They were just being polite. NPR also "used" college students to say Dean was a liberal. Gephardt got more attention than Clark. It was more NPR propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Cause of Dean's gun buddies we'll carry Shangri-la &Eldorado too
What bullshi#! Dems are losing all the states that are predominately fundementalist. The gun lobby keeps losing in religiously diverse Michigan and Pennsylvania, but Dems keep losing in fundie land regardless of their gun stands. Roy Barnes in Georgia was as gun friendly as a governor in a state with a large urban population could be, but still lost. The idea that promiscuous gun regulation trumps civil unions in fundieland is way off base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scott Lee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
60. Yeah, so badly that he's running at the top in Georgia.
If Dean doesn't stop this, he may find himself winning all the South.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Michigander4Dean Donating Member (588 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. Any state with a significant single-issue gun electorate
Guns are why Gore lost West Virginia, Ohio, Missouri, New Hampshire, Tennessee, and perhaps Virginia, Arizona, and Montana.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Don't forget New Mexico.
Very winnable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Didn't Gore win New Mexico?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #17
43. By a hair thin margin. Bush+BBV makes NM red for Dubya w/ Dean
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Guns on VA?
Yes Guns are important here, but I dont see Dean or even Clark winning here. IIRC even Carter didn't win here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. He has to fight like a motherF***er in PA
Guns and unions may help him a little. This is no shoe-in for either party. It is a ruthless battleground and I want Dean or the Dem nominee to campaign all over this state.

With Nader out of the picture he should fight hard in Florida as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ryharrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #16
28. He's already within 6% against Bush, so its definitely possible.
He's doing the best out of all the candidates against bush there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaitykaity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. On the gun issue alone, Dean could get1
Arkansas and Tennessee. I also think he could
do well in Louisiana (with the help of Senator
Landrieu, and the new Dem governor).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. Ohio and West Virginia at least.
He could stand to benefit from the steel tariffs being repealed. Being pro-gun could help him in the Southwest. Bob Graham could help him in Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. Virginia.....Tennesee.....Louisiana......Alabama......Indiana
I feel these states are not happy with the GOP.

It should be interesting.

Bush is most certainly not know for his true "COMPASSION"!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Here's proof that guns are "code" that they aren't the real reason
<http://www.buzzflash.com/interviews/03/12/int03326.html>

UC Berkeley Sociologist Arlie Hochschild answers the question, "Why are 50% of Blue Collar White Males Planning to Vote for Bush in 2004, Even When He is Picking Their Pockets and Stealing the Futures of Their Children?"

A BUZZFLASH INTERVIEW

"George W. Bush is sinking in the polls, but a few beats on the war drum could reverse that trend and re-elect him in 2004. Ironically, the sector of American society now poised to keep him in the White House is the one which stands to lose the most from virtually all of his policies -- blue-collar men. A full 49 percent of them and 38 percent percent of blue-collar women told a January 2003 Roper poll they would vote for Bush in 2004." -- Arlie Hochschild

Perhaps the central paradox for a Democratic presidential candidate is figuring out how to attract some of the 50% of blue collar workers who might vote for Bush. Howard Dean awkwardly addressed the issue when he referred to the need to attract guys with "Confederate flag bumper stickers." Dean used the wrong metaphor, but he was correct in identifying a key election challenge for the Democrats.

Recently, we read a TomDispatch.Com article by Arlie Hochschild, "Let Them Eat War," and were impressed by her understanding of the issue. Hochschild doesn't mince words: Bush's "policy -- and this his political advisor Karl Rove has carefully calibrated -- is something like the old bait-and-switch. He continues to take the steaks out of the blue-collar refrigerator and to declare instead, 'let them eat war.' He has been, in effect, strip-mining the emotional responses of blue-collar men to the problems his own administration is so intent on causing."


-------------snip------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phelan Donating Member (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #20
47. If Dean wins Alabama in the general election I'll buy everyone here a car
It may be a Kia but hey
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
22. Florida
Remember, Gore won it in 2000, if the votes were only counted. The scrubbed black voters have been restored to the rolls thanks to the NAACP suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #22
45. Not true, Quaker Bill. Tallahassee Democrat indicates otherwise, 11/30/03
http://www.tallahassee.com/mld/democrat/2003/11/30/news/local/7376572.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp

Posted on Sun, Nov. 30, 2003

SPECIAL REPORT: DEJA VOTE?

Hurdles remain
Florida's voter database won't be ready in time
By Nancy Cook Lauer
DEMOCRAT CAPITOL BUREAU CHIEF


Florida has spent tens of millions of dollars on new equipment, voter education and poll worker training since the 2000 election meltdown. But none of those reforms will matter if the would-be voter is denied a chance to cast a ballot to begin with.

And after spending almost $6 million to create - and then fix - a database to ensure accuracy in county voter rolls by weeding out ineligible voters, Florida will not meet a federal requirement to establish a central voter-registration database in time for the 2004 presidential election. The state now is seeking a waiver until 2006.

Many state lawmakers seem unconcerned. A Division of Elections update on how the state is implementing federal requirements earlier this month before a Senate appropriations subcommittee lasted about five minutes and drew no questions from committee members.

But Rep. Chris Smith, D-Fort Lauderdale, appointed by Gov. Jeb Bush to a task force to fix the state's election problems, called the failure to establish the central registration database "a major concern."

...more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
23. A very short list--NH While Clark picks up WV, AR, FL, and maybe even OH
Edited on Thu Dec-18-03 10:44 PM by John_H
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MIMStigator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Dean won't even win NH
a poll last week showed him 30 points behind * in NH where they know him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. premature
speculation.

Another 9 months of Dubya and there will be plenty of converts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaitykaity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. What poll exactly?

Any comparisons to where Clinton was against Bush I
at this same time in the campaign?

Just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill of Rights Donating Member (424 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
27. I'd like to speculate about 3 candidates
Dean - Florida. I think the masses are going to come out for this one. These would be the masses who are not usually polled.

Gephardt - Florida, Missouri and Ohio. He has a great shot at beating Bush. Almost makes me want to support him as my #1.

Clark - Florida, Arkansas, Louisiana.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #27
38. "Almost makes me want to support him as my #1."
What? That slime ball?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaintLouisBlues Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #38
49. Gephardt is an honorable public servant
and would make a very good president.

Slimeball? Grow up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
31. My first thoughts
would be NH, WV, Arizona, Nevada, Ohio. Depending on the VP choice (I have my theories) Arkansas, Tennessee, Missouri, Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
32. The South Is The Most Culturally Conservative Region In The Nation
and Howard Dean is the most culturally liberal major candidate in the race...

The South is the most religious region in the nation and Howard Dean is the most secular major candidate in the race...

The South is the most pro-Iraq war region in the nation and Howard Dean is the most anti-Iraq war major candidate in the race...


These are the facts...

Make your own conclusions....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9119495 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. The South is the most conservative...so none of our guys
will pull votes there. Forget about SC, AL, and MS--they would vote for a Bush-Hitler ticket. The idea that Clark, Gep, or Edwards could get Southerners to turn against "a president guided by god" and one "from the South" is rediculous.

So, since you've directed us to make our own conclusions, I'll point you to states already mentioned in this thread, notably WV, NV, OH, AZ--so few are needed if most (not all, even) Gore states are held.

Remember, Dean has the grass roots growing--I don't see any other democrat that will be able to get out the vote as Dean will--even though I like most of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
34. Bank on it...
Edited on Fri Dec-19-03 09:36 AM by HFishbine
Florida, North Carolina, Virginia, Arkansas, Louisian, Missourri, Arizona, West Virginia, Alaska, Indiana and Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
36. Maybe WV and NH
My confidence is low at the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
37. Only correct answer, absent a crystal ball:
No one can possibly know, at this juncture. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
39. None - and a tie is a loss in 2004
We need a strong Democratic alternative to Bush in order to beat the Republican margin of theft and the shift in electoral votes to Bush states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
40. If Florida is Registered as a Win This Time
Dean could actually LOSE Pennsylvania or Illinois and and still win the electoral college.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #40
50. No way. If we trade Florida for Pa. we still lose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
44. Well with recent Nader news ... FLORIDA !
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. It's only recent Nader *rumor*. Hope should be grounded in facts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
54. Before you get to that question, wouldn't it make sense to ask
whether Dean could carry all the states Gore carried in 2000? Deaniacs seem to accept this proposition as a foregone conclusion, but I just don't see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
58. N-O O-N-E K-N-O-W-S!
Edited on Fri Dec-19-03 07:19 PM by Padraig18
It's all pure speculation at this point, much like ancient Roman augurs examining pigeon entrails--- and just about as accurate or useful... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
59. The state of depression
if we lose. OK, seriously... Dean is an unknown. He will either win 25 states or lose 49-50. It is hard to say how America will take him. His recent performences make me think he will win 1-2. It depends on the day, and that's one of the many things that are scary about Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frustrated_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
61. Louisiana, Florida, Tennesee
Gore lost Tenn due to his NRA stance.

Louisiana and Florida are different stories, butI think Dean can deliver there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC