Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wouldn't it be funny if Hillary wins Louisiana today?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:16 PM
Original message
Wouldn't it be funny if Hillary wins Louisiana today?
In a low turnout election, anything is possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. I know John McCain would think so
He'll be laughing all the way to the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red Zelda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I totally agree
McInsane is clapping loudly for Billary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neutron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Karl Rove endorses Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red Zelda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. Rove never told the truth in his fat, pathetic life
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Most uber-asshole Rugnicons endorse the person they fear the most...
because they know Democrats will perceive it negatively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well
she WAS the first one out with a cohesive plan to rebuild NOLA and the surrounding areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Someone gets the point.
Thank you, maddiejoan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
31. Yeah, without those pesky poor blacks
Whom the local Dem legislators have voted to exclude based on the terms of
Bill Clinton's class warfare HOPE VI demolition program (which you Hillary
fans, who don't support public housing, know nothing about.)

But it's OK to kick black people out of their homes while they are still
forcibly displaced by the federal government due to Katrina, as long as
it gives Hillary a white electorate to work with so she can keep the red
states irrelevant in the fall (as per the game plan before Howard Dean,
when Dixiecrats kept the state party apparatus in a file cabinet in a
law office under bankruptcy protection in order to prevent blacks from
voting in the primaries.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. wow
Can I have some of whatever you're smoking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bilgewaterbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hysterical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why would that be funny?
I don't understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. because Obama was widely expected to cleanup based on strong black turnout
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. I wonder if the polling places are prepared for ANY strong turnout.
in other words, not a rehash of the NM debacle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
33. Because the ethnic cleansing of black people is always funny.
Especially when it helps your candidate. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrsT Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think she could.
All the Obama supporters think this is going to be a blowout, but they will be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Because they're counting on the blacks to vote for him or no one. I'm disgusted about it.
Never in my life would I have thought that my race would vote for the black candidate just because they were black. But, then again, I was also sure they would find OJ guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Women for Hillary!
Kind of like how women are voting for Hillary just because she is one of them when all signs indicate she is the weaker candidate in a general election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. link to women voting in a block for Clinton like blacks are voting for Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. I can understand how you must feel, having watched fellow whites
here in NC vote for grotesquely inferior candidates just because of the color of their skin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. Hillary is shamelessly pandering to women. Soooo why the double standard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. And Obama is shamelessly pandering to Pookie and Ray Ray..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
32. You should be pleased that people who see the world in those terms of "my race" voted for Jindal
Edited on Sat Feb-09-08 01:48 PM by Leopolds Ghost
Because he promised "law and order" to his skinhead constituents in
Jefferson Parish, who after all share only one goal in common with
conservative black suburban Democrats: demonize the inner city poor.
Hillary's husband was expert in this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
38. OJ had a great team behind him, too, distorting the facts, manipulating emotions.
His "Dream Team" also had the benefit of a very racist conniving glove-dropper on the other side, who totally poisoned the well of evidence.

I think the jury made the best choice they could, based on the evidence with which they were presented and the circus atmosphere. Media involvement made a mockery of our justice system.

His book, How I Would Have Done It, was pretty much the final proof of his direct or indirect involvement in the murders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. I would be shocked n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. why would that be humorous?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. You want a low turn out
so it will benefit your candidate? Why not just put up a sign "Obama supporters stay home so Hillary can win!"

Geez.

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. No. The point is that the supposed "movement" sweeping the nation
Isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
35. Yes. Thanks to HOPE VI barricades keeping po' folks out, LA is Hillary's firewall-levee.
Edited on Sat Feb-09-08 01:50 PM by Leopolds Ghost
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. she may, who knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. Who knows!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
19. I would be shocked and I don't think it's going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
21. I bet there's going to be a couple surprises between now and March 4
I wonder what they will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
22. why would there be low turnout?
This election has been noted for it's high turnout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moh96 Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
23. keep dreaming
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rock_Garden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
25. Funny and good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
29. Low turnout except for non-whites. They always vote in large numbers. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. My data shows JUST THE OPPOSITE HAS BEEN HISTORICALLY THE CASE. A REFERENCE??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. And you want it to remain that way.
Let's keep inner city blacks from returning to their neighborhoods just long enough for Hillary to win, then she can write off their vote in the fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. As long as we're talking about exploiting people ...
Obama plans to write off the GLBT vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
39. Isn't it funny how low turnout helps your candidate?
Isn't there an opposing party for whom that is also the case? Hmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
41. Yes, it would be funny
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC