|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:11 PM Original message |
Edwards supporters, some perspective please. Your take on the Chelsea incident. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
1. What Shuster said sucked. To banish him from the airwaves is wrong... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:40 PM Response to Reply #1 |
26. He wasn't BANISHED! He was suspended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:44 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. I'm in agreement... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 09:01 PM Response to Reply #26 |
69. Yes he does - you'll find no argument from me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pale Blue Dot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
2. I already made my comment here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
3. Personally, I won't be happy until I see David Shuster burning on a cross. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caligirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
19. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
4. Edwards supporters have no objectivity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:21 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. I have read some happy horseshit on this website but this takes the cake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pauldg0 (608 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:45 PM Response to Reply #8 |
64. Your absolutely right........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:21 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. I disagree with your assessment of Edwards being responsible for the "shit stirred up" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:23 PM Response to Reply #4 |
13. Now this is the silliest post ever.It speaks to who you are. Talk about a stretch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glowing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:25 PM Response to Reply #4 |
15. No, its not worship.. its realizing the policies and seeing that those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
citizen snips (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:34 PM Response to Reply #4 |
23. Bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tennessee Gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:04 PM Response to Reply #4 |
38. That is totally unfounded and ridiculous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
50. sandnsea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inspired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:34 PM Response to Reply #4 |
59. You crack me up! You blame Edwards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KitchenWitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:00 AM Response to Reply #4 |
77. stupidest post today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nite Owl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
5. He apologized |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
6. He's a good reporter who made a boneheaded mistake and apologized. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
7. it's yet another entirely contrived event by the Clintons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hobarticus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
9. Said it before, so I'll just cut n' paste... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
11. I think it was ludicrous to be angry at him. He clearly meant it metaphorically - Chelsea is grown |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlackVelvet04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:36 PM Response to Reply #11 |
24. that's not using the word in the same context at all. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:55 PM Response to Reply #24 |
33. The context he used was quite specific -- they were pimping her out = using her to work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlackVelvet04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:58 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. No it's a bunch of women who are sick of sexist, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:01 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Bull -- it's not sexist in the least. I'm a feminist and I think the comment was innocent if dumb |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlackVelvet04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 09:48 PM Response to Reply #35 |
71. Yeah, I can tell how feminist you are with the bitching comment... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:01 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. the word choice was saying the former Presidents daughter is a whore.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:03 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. That's how you're taking it because you want to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:17 PM Response to Reply #37 |
43. do you read minds too? how do you know what he meant..i can't read minds..but i damn well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:31 PM Response to Reply #43 |
56. I think an apology was in order -- but that is all n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:07 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. Oh sure. He meant that they were letting the Super Delegates sleep with Chelsea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:22 PM Response to Reply #36 |
47. The fact that you insist on assigning the worst possible meaning... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:25 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. why don't you give us your interpretation of a pimps job? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:31 PM Response to Reply #48 |
54. Do you REALLY think Schuster was saying that the Clintons were having delegates SLEEP WITH HER? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:35 PM Response to Reply #54 |
60. nooooooooooo..but his reference was out of line and his choice of words was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:52 PM Response to Reply #60 |
66. And also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 10:12 PM Response to Reply #66 |
72. hey i didn't ask the frigging question..why does anyone ask a question if they don't want our |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 11:16 PM Response to Reply #72 |
73. Dude, you offered your opinion, and I thank you. But I didn't think, having asked the question... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 09:22 PM Response to Reply #47 |
70. Okay, if you're not rigidly judgemental, then you're acting deliberately oblique... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 02:48 AM Response to Reply #70 |
75. I answered a question addressed to edwards supporters.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 09:57 AM Response to Reply #75 |
79. Ahhh, rigid judgementalism AND paranoia. Nice combination. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 07:22 PM Response to Reply #79 |
80. its called having an opinion..what are we not allowed an opinion anymore? ..who asked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 12:23 PM Response to Reply #80 |
81. I'm not an "Obama people." The OP asked for Edwards supporters, remember? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:26 PM Response to Reply #11 |
51. But what if he'd said it about Obama and his wife. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:05 AM Response to Reply #11 |
78. Yes, and the fact is they are pimping her out to hustle votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DearAbby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 12:40 PM Response to Reply #11 |
83. Did anyone call Romney's sons..MAN WHORES? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
12. what Shuster said was wrong..it was disgraceful and not worthy of his chosen job. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redbear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
14. I consider it like Biden's comment on Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
16. I think it wqas nasty, sexist and wrong.A suspension is warrented but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caligirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
17. Clinton should have called him personally and gotten his apology without |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:33 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. they did, as I understand it and he refused, sending back a snarky e-mail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caligirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:52 PM Response to Reply #22 |
32. Ohhhhhh... ego's do abound don't they. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cassandra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
18. Having come back late to this controversy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:31 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. I'm for Clinton but find your post right-on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
southernleftylady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
21. its not an outrage for goodness sakes!! There are so many BIGGER issues out there to be upset about! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
25. The campaign acted appropriately and Shuster being suspended is appropriate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
27. It was a stupid comment to make. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
28. I couldn't care less one way or another |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
30. Shuster shouldn't have said what he said and does deserve some type of suspension |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tired_old_fireman (323 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
31. Only an asshole would insult a candidate's daughter like that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:06 PM Response to Reply #31 |
39. His kids are not adults. His kids are not working the campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tired_old_fireman (323 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:20 PM Response to Reply #39 |
46. I'm not sure I understand your point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:30 PM Response to Reply #46 |
52. But some people here are saying she's out of bounds because she's Clinton's kid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tired_old_fireman (323 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:52 PM Response to Reply #52 |
67. Reporters and politicians need to be careful with their words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:57 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. Here's another definition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tennessee Gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
41. I really don't know what to think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tnlefty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
42. His comments were low and disgusting to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:26 PM Response to Reply #42 |
49. It would have been fine to me. Also the Kerry girls. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tnlefty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:44 PM Response to Reply #49 |
63. Yes they are wrong and disgusting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caligirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
44. well KO just profusly apologized on behalf of MSNBC for Shusters pimp usage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:20 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. he sure did!! eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
53. I like Shuster. But he was wrong, it was petty and unprofessional. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
55. there is no defending Shuster's comment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
surfermaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
57. Why drag Edwards in this, last I heard he was in C.H. and with, Jack at at least two Carolina B.Game |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:32 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. I'm not. I like his supporters and their perspective |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inspired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
61. Since you asked....I could care less about this crap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RevolutionStartsNow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
62. Disgusting comment. He should apologize. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
65. Wrong and inappropriate but not part of a pattern |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zodiak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 11:19 PM Response to Original message |
74. I find these tempest in a teapot issues to be easy distractions from the real issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KitchenWitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 02:59 AM Response to Original message |
76. Mountains out of molehills. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DearAbby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
82. Children of the Candidates should be off limits |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC