|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 05:54 PM Original message |
About seating delegates: does anyone remember the fuss over the Mississippi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Devlzown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
1. It happened in 1968 in Chicago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 06:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Wow - look what happened four years later: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Devlzown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 06:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I've only read about this stuff -- I wasn't born |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 06:20 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. It's what I grew up with . We got our firstTV in 1960 so Mom could |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 06:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Could come to that. Very interesting precedent. I think Obama supporters should heed this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 06:21 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. At least it won't be as bad as 1860! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 06:22 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. '72 was a fucking zoo. Not as bad as '68, but still pretty messy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 06:25 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Cali was supposed to be "winner take all" in 1972 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 07:58 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Goes to show that people have tried to change the rules halfway though the game before this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 08:11 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. I have a feeling she'll try to get FL and MI seated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 01:38 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC