Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Todd Gitlin's interesting Obama endorsement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:53 PM
Original message
Todd Gitlin's interesting Obama endorsement
If you don't know who he is: He's an interesting guy. Sociologist, old SDS lefty, quite an honest and smart guy. Writer, intellectual, Professor.

"Jumping the Fence to Obama
By Todd Gitlin - February 4, 2008, 1:05PM

A couple of weeks ago, I was still agonizing, though leaning Obama. The New Republic asked me to tell a waiting world where I was going. At that point, I celebrated the dawn of each new day with a ride on the roller coaster. Well, a few days later, by the time my little piece came out, I'd tilted. For what it's worth, the path of my pilgrim's progress might be of interest to other wobblers.

Here was my reasoning on Jan. 21:

"Between Clinton and Obama, on paper, not much daylight shines through....On positions, totting up the apples and oranges as best I can, it’s Clinton on points, though not a knockout....Then, the question of governing method....If nothing else, the egregious Bush years ought to instruct us that it matters hugely how the president thinks, or fails to think; whom he or she consults with. On foreign policy, each would be far better than the simple absence of Bush, splendid as that would be, but I prefer Obama’s Brzezinski and Samantha Powers to Clinton’s Albright and Holbrooke. (On domestic matters, which of course aren’t strictly domestic, I’m rather tired of Robert Rubin.)"
A big question, then, was what kind of governing will these candidates do?

And I wondered: "I applaud Obama for saying that he wants to eliminate nuclear weapons from the world, but what will he do to get that done? On global warming will he face down big oil? On health care, big pharma? And the other bigs? He wins on eloquence, which bodes well to rally public support—if that’s what he wants to do. About this, with all his talk about table participants, he’s cagey.

<snip>

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/04/jumping_the_fence_to_obama/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hillary gets the most points; Obama wins on "eloquence".
And he tipped because of the Clintons' "tasteless moves" -- covered in loving detail by the press he prides himself on being wary of.

There are many good reasons to vote for Obama. Why are so many otherwise intelligent people making an important decision based on an emotional high?

:shrug:

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC