|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:31 PM Original message |
FDR garnished people's wages |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kitsune (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
1. FDR didn't garnish wages to hand said wages over to price-gouging insurance companies *nt* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OhioChick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:37 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Good Argument. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlackVelvet04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. No, he handed it over to the government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kitsune (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:47 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. "If everyone has health insurance the price will go down." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:50 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kitsune (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:54 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Forcing me to pay a private company for health insurance is not addressing the problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlackVelvet04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 01:16 PM Response to Reply #14 |
33. No, they won't be allowed to.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 01:00 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. You don't start negotiating with an offer of what you'll settle for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 01:02 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Not in this case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 01:06 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. No they wouldn't. American people WANT a government-sponsored single-payer plan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 01:10 PM Response to Reply #10 |
29. Through election-losing "mandates", nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlackVelvet04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:52 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. oh bullshit. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:53 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. False analogy about gas. I don't know why you'd make it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kitsune (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:56 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. I will admit it is not the best analogy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:57 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. I don't assume premiums wll go down. There will need to be additional work done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BearSquirrel2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 02:22 PM Response to Reply #13 |
42. The supply of health care is kinda fixed ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 01:04 PM Response to Reply #9 |
21. Just ask MA. They've had to do it TWICE in two decades |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 01:04 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. what politically feasible solution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 01:14 PM Response to Reply #23 |
32. HR 676 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 01:35 PM Response to Reply #32 |
39. And tell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 04:13 PM Response to Reply #39 |
45. How did they do it with SS, then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BearSquirrel2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 02:25 PM Response to Reply #32 |
43. SCHIP ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 01:09 PM Response to Reply #9 |
28. No need to compare with gas even, look at auto insurance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 01:17 PM Response to Reply #6 |
35. My brain almost split in two after reading that non sequitor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karmadillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
2. OMG!!! Can he still be impeached????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:36 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
5. I'll try to remember that when the GOP is running the attack ads about "MANDATORY HILLARYCARE!!1!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
7. He set a 1.5% tax |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:44 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. The issue is that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 01:17 PM Response to Reply #8 |
34. Really?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 02:15 PM Response to Reply #34 |
41. Again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MoonRiver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
12. Oh no, you're gonna take Obamaniacs down the cognitive dissonance hole! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
17. A serving suggestion: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 01:04 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. No she didn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
20. And I would be perfectly happy with a tax-supported single-payer system. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 01:05 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. I would, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 01:20 PM Response to Reply #24 |
36. My problem with Hillary's plan isn't in the garnishment of wages exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 01:08 PM Response to Reply #20 |
26. Me too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
27. Um, if Universal Health Care were like Social Security, it wouldn't be the issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 01:11 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. this answer says all that needs to be said on this issue.- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 01:14 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. So all the outrage here is NOT actually about mandates... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 01:23 PM Response to Reply #31 |
37. For me it's about ridiculous mandates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indenturedebtor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 01:31 PM Response to Reply #31 |
38. Um |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 01:37 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. and requiring everybody |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 04:38 PM Response to Reply #40 |
46. Single-payer coverage does not necessarily prohibit private coverage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
44. That rat BASTARD!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 11:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC