Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If a person trusted Bush in 2003, how good can her judgment possibly be?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:28 PM
Original message
If a person trusted Bush in 2003, how good can her judgment possibly be?


:shrug:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not very good at all.
Pretty bad, actually, and certainly not the kind of judgement I want in the WH for the next 4/6 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Don't say that...you get your guy in trouble when he BELIEVED BUSH
back when he gave an exclusive interview to the Chicago Trib. He told the reporter and it is archived at the Trib, that he believed President Bush when he said that Iran had nuclear weapons and that he, himself would bomb Iran....I didn't say he did and it's over at the Trib.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. how do I get JED in trouble?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. If a person believes your framing of the issue is valid...
...how good can their judgment possibly be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. typical obligatory Clinton campaign style response, how the hell did you get through my Ignore net?
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Hey, I admire the rhetorical device being used...
...but oversimplifying life and death issues like war is no better than hiding in nuance. I believe Hillary's account. I don't believe either Kerry or Edwards deserve to be tarred with their IWR vote like it is some kind of scarlet letter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. well what did THESE Senators know?? The story lies in the amendments
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 10:53 PM by burythehatchet
YEAs ---24
Akaka (D-HI)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Byrd (D-WV)
Chafee (R-RI)
Conrad (D-ND)
Corzine (D-NJ)
Dayton (D-MN)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Harkin (D-IA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Jeffords (I-VT)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Leahy (D-VT)
the Levin Amendment(D-MI)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Reed (D-RI)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Wellstone (D-MN)
Wyden (D-OR)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. That was addressed in the debate tonight.
Basically Clinton said that the amendment would have made American action dependent on U.N. approval and she did not want to set that precedent. She did say she regretted what Bush did with the authority she helped give him.

The people in New York re-elected her overwhelmingly. Wes Clark (who was supposedy for the Levin Amendment, BTW) endorsed Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Look at the vote.......
and see who else voted for it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. They're no longer running for president. And that's not the point
She assumed a leadership position in the Senate the moment she arrived. She had an obligation to lead on the big issues and she was complicit with many Dems in giving our positions away. That IS NOT leadership. She is not a leader, she is a technocrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Did you see every bit of the information she was given?
Were you there? I feel pretty secure in saying you weren't.

Edwards voted for it. Kerry voted for it. Lots of people voted for both of them. I think maybe you guys are desperate because it is the ONLY issue Obama had any leg up on Hillary tonight.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I didn't need to. Follow the logic: There was evidence that Iraq was disarmed.
There was no evidence to the contrary. Certainly, the bushies misled the senate, no one doubts that, but it still comes down to trusting Bush without verification. Fatal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Not good. I knew not to trust him; she knows him better than I.
Either she trusted him which shows very poor judgement or she knew of the lies and went along anyway.
AND - she has never been able to apologize for being wrong. NEVER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. that's the point, I knew. And I have another full time job to occupy me n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. can you stop raining on this wonderful parade of our wonderful candidates for 1 night?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I can. Are you sending me to my room?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. Her poor judgement has become her Achilles heel.
I'll never understand why anyone would trust bush on anything. My teenagers know better than to take his word on anything. Why Hillary trusted him is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. OH MAN>>I just saw Troy with Pitt as Achilles. COOL movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Samantha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. Her judgment was not as good as that of the average DU'er
Many of us were outraged at that time and remain so today. Tonight's debate did not change that for me. My question at that time was if Bush* cannot be trusted to tell the truth about an election, how can he be trusted on an issue of war. I too thought she was either incredibly naive to trust this man or she was covering her political flank for her presidential run. I have never changed my mind on that opinion. And that's exactly why I will not vote for her.

Either way, people should not die because of the naivety of political leaders or their proclivity to cover their political posteriors. And millions have.

Sam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
19. 99-1...
She wasn't alone...besides, Bush was going in anyway...I think it's a moot argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. whoa, check-mate, dude!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
22. That is definitely PART of the problem.
Any dumb bunny KNEW that the Iraq resolution would be used by Bush to take us to war. Both Kerry and Clinton have said, during their respective Presidential campaigns, that Bush didn't adhere to the resolution's requirements in taking the country to war -- but neither have sought impeachment hearings against him for having done so, making their protestations ring hollow.

Further, she repeatedly says "if I knew then what I know now" that she wouldn't have voted for the resolution; but might she not have known then what she knows now if she had bothered to actually read the Iraq NIE before voting to support going to war? Simple question of Hillary... Did you read the Iraq NIE before voting to authorize force?

Here's a great post over on MyDD, with a relevant excerpt on how the Right Wing used Kerry's vote and his failure to read the NIE against him...If Hillary's the Dem nominee, you can bank on a barrage of "she voted for the war, before she supported surrender" and "the dog ate Hillary's homework" campaign ads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC