Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama distorts in Denver

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 11:11 PM
Original message
Obama distorts in Denver
http://www.talkleft.com/story/2008/1/30/23229/8465

Barack Obama spoke in Denver today. Here's what he said:

“It’s time for new leadership that understands that the way to win a debate with John McCain is not by nominating someone who agreed with him on voting for the war in Iraq; who agreed with him in voting to give George Bush the benefit of the doubt on Iran; who agrees with him in embracing the Bush-Cheney policy of not talking to leaders we don’t like, and who actually differed with him by arguing for exceptions for torture before changing positions when the politics of the moment changed.”
Hillary's refutes him point by point on her website.

This is a dangerous road for Obama. Check out his past support for Rumsfeld and Bush, expressed during the confirmation process of John Ashcroft. He even calls Rumsfeld "not out of the mainstream." (video here)

"The proof in the pudding is looking at the treatment of the other Bush nominees," Obama said. "I mean for the most part, I for example do not agree with a missile defense system, but I dont think that soon-to-be-Secretary Rumsfeld is in any way out of the mainstream of American political life. And I would argue that the same would be true for the vast majority of the Bush nominees, and I give him credit for that."
I would say "pot meet kettle" except his statements about Hillary were not true. Hillary has been the most vocal critic of President Bush and his policies among all the Democratic candidates. From the early debates, while the others criticized her because they perceived her to be the frontrunner, she kept her eye on the real enemy: President Bush, his Administration and its failed and misguided policies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tweed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. KennedyGuy, I hope your brain doesn't explode
But Clinton voted for YEA for Rumsfeld.

This is an insanely stupid argument to make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. thanks for the concern...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tweed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. wow, don't even address the point
Typical Clinton style politics, just try and tear everything down, refuse to discuss logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. where did you address the point?
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 11:19 PM by KennedyGuy
you had a rather mindless attack Obama style yourself..
I mean..is insanely stupid the best an obamababy can do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's about time Obama draws a contrast between him and Hillary on the Iraq war
I don't know what took him so long. That is one of his most valuable weapons in this campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I think it because the response will be that he kept voting to fund it & made no effort to stop it
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 11:28 PM by wlucinda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks. Can't wait til she destorys him with this tomorrow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemCam Donating Member (911 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. me too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. Refuted on her website...
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

The refutation consists of "Well, Obama actually voted the same way Hillary did on Iraq issues"..

Which is true!

But hardly the point. And doesn't address what Obama said in the paragraph you quoted.

Obama did not vote for the IWR, Clinton did. Obama didn't vote that way because he was in the Senate. And, going by what he SAID at the the time, he didn't think that it was a good idea to go to war in Iraq. Clinton says that she voted because she was "told" that Bush would use it to negotiate with Iraq. She trusted Bush... which should disqualify her to be President (lack of judgment).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Rummy still is "part of the mainstream...
of American political life"...and he has been for decades. Where you been?
here's a link you might enjoy.
http://www.nndb.com/group/269/000093987/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC