Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would it have killed Edwards to just go through Super Tuesday?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:36 PM
Original message
Would it have killed Edwards to just go through Super Tuesday?
Why not? What did he have to lose? - Nothing.

Five days! FIVE days!

Who knows how well he would have done.

He had everything to gain - delegates. So he could have a more powerful voice at the convention over platform and issues.

Why give that up for - - - nothing?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Andrea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. My question, too
If we had the answer to that question, I bet it would be shocking. Seriously, there was no reason at all not to wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. I can't second guess his decision and I won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Probably not
but he didn't. And yes it sucks, but that's that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. According to the articles I read, he phoned Clinton to tell her he was dropping out.
I didn't see any reports of the same call being made to Obama. Yes, I am reading a lot into that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. He did call Obama. MSNBC failed to report it but CNN did. That should tell you something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. If that's the case, then that blows my phony-baloney theory. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. he called both of them. now you can stop reading into something false. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foxer Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
47. I read that she's the one that leaked, class act!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Something is a foot -
I have heard him speak over 300 times and never once have I heard him flub, he did today and it was eerie. I don't pretend to know what's going on behind the scenes but there is something there. Edwards has been honest this whole campaign, so I would expect an answer to this at some point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Someone made him an offer he couldn't refuse
I'm not sure I want to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Agreed, waiting. I think it smells. Something is wrong. In the meantime, the
fact that he isn't endorsing is also strange. John knows his mind and it isn't like him to remain neutral, as if he's waiting for something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. My guess is a VP position
and I think it will be from Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressIn2008 Donating Member (848 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. I noticed that too -- he was very subdued, especially during
the obligatory party unity part at the beginning. He looked up when people clapped for "defeating Bush" and gave... a strange look.

He had some more fire when he talked about poverty issues afterwards.

I don't know, I think there's more here than meets the eye. When Gore conceded, he looked relieved, like a great weight had been lifted from his shoulders. Edwards didn't look like that at all.

However, it's the greatest testament to his campaign and message that he stepped away from the microphone and went to pick up a hammer to help build a house. He didn't have to do that, and I noticed that, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Just thinking about this stuff is driving me crazy
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 07:41 PM by alyce douglas
I think they pushed him out, or this is topic another discussion. Just a question to you guys, can a VP run again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Meaning what?
Can Cheney run again? Yes.

Or do you mean can a VP candidate who lost run again? The answer also is yes, but I doubt very much either candidate would choose him, or that he's terribly interested in doing that again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. so cheney can run again, all speculation, but does anyone
think McCain would ask Cheney to be his VP, and not to give up the powers that they have now. Just speculating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fed_Up_Grammy Donating Member (923 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. You have GOT to be kidding!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. I know the idea is kind of out there, but we know how these thugs
want to hold onto power. Just speculating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fed_Up_Grammy Donating Member (923 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Speculations like that could give you nightmares.
Go Pats !!!!! :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. just another theory, I would like to throw out there, in most of our
recent presidencies either the president or vp were graduates of Yale could it be some sort of brotherhood thing to always have a Yalie in either the Presidency or VP, like skull and bones. If anyone would like to research this and document all the Presidents and VP's were from Yale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fed_Up_Grammy Donating Member (923 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. There were more than a few Masons too.
Think football and relax---these conpiracy theories could drive you nuts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #27
39. Not a chance
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 08:17 PM by MonkeyFunk
he's one of the most disliked people in America. Plus, McCain/Cheney? It'd be like a bad version of the Sunshine Boys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. Just wait-- he didn't rule out an endorsement
He may be waiting until next Monday to drop that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. Here's the thing: too many people are early voting. Look at how many votes
HRC got in early voting when people who waited clearly chose Obama. If he's going to endorse, unless there is something calculated going on, he should do it now. Thats just MHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. If he endorses, his delegates are committed to whomever he endorses, IIRC
If he doesn't, he keeps them until the convention
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mentalsolstice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. I hope not!
I would love for him to be a voice in either Dem GE campaign/administration. He'd be a perfect AG, and then onto SCOTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. My tinfoil says Howard Dean made the call.
Obama and Clinton are too close, and even waiting until SuperTuesday would handicap the Democratic Party. The pukes are falling in behind McCain, so we need to get out Nominee sooner rather than later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Higher than that
Even if Dean made the call, he was just the messenger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Who would that be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
33. Funders, maybe?
All the big money shifted from GOP to Dem campaigns this year. That wasn't an accident or because they liked our candidates. They wanted to hedge their bets, I suppose. That shift happened not just at the level of the presidential race, but also the congressional races.

The big money donors basically bought the Democratic Party this year and they're now calling the shots. They didn't want Edwards growing support in the race causing them to burn up their cash. IMHO they want to narrow the Dem field ASAP and, with McCain's good showing in Florida, used him as leverage to force the Dems to push Edwards out.

I suspect they'll want Obama or Clinton out after Super Tuesday. Dems are no longer in control of their presidential race and there is no guarantee the money will keep coming in after the primary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. If true, then Howard Dean goes way down in my estimation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuelahWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
46. Mine too
He apparently has a short memory as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. Dean did say that it would be good to
have the nominee by 2/5. Clyburn (Sp?) and others have been saying in the past two weeks that all three would be at the convention with delegates and no one would have 50% - If Dean did do this, my estimation of him would go down, He, of all people, should know what a media black out does and how that hurts the party too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I remember hearing Dean say that in a recent interview, now that you mention it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. Dems debate tomorrow. Edwards excels at the format. Why quit today?
His numbers rose after every debate.

This makes no sense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'm surprised, too, at the timing.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
28. I've followed Edwards a long time. I think he was concerned his efforts would hurt the Dem Party
A brokered convention with two candidates who can barely stand each other would damage the chances of retaking the WHite House, and down line ticket races.

Edwards will get offers to serve in some capacity in the next Administration if a Democrat is elected President. Nothing smells about that. Edwards is supremely talented and can move the Democratic Party into more progressive positions from such a post. However, I do not believe Edwards has been offered, nor sought, to exchange his endorsement for a guaranteed position in that candidate's Administration. It would be inconsistent with his past conduct and character.

By suspending his campaign today, the next Debate will be just Obama and Hillary. In all likelihood we will soon know who will the Party Nominee --as will the Republican Nominee. THat will give the DEMocratic Party time to come together and heal the rifts that are prominent today --and which would have been much nastier and wider in a brokered convention setting.

I think Edwards thought it through, and made the best decision possible for his Party and his family. Can't fault him for being willing to put both ahead of his own personal ambition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. But 5 days wouldn't have made much difference in that regard
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 08:15 PM by Wednesdays
He could have just folded his campaign on Feb. 6, and thrown his delegates and endorsement to one or the other of the remaining two candidates.

Or, if that would have been too divisive, he could have endorsed no one and left it up to his delegates to make up their own minds.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #36
45. There is a good chance Edwards could have extended the Decision to the Convention...
... the constant devisive competing campaigns of Clinton and Obama would have given the Repub Nominee a step up to consolidate the Repub Party behind him and start early attacking Democrats still fractured by the lack of a Nominee.

Yes, Edwards could have done as you say, but I think he put the Party and the Nation's well-being first. We as a Party must retake the Government in order to begin repairing the damage. THat must be our highest priority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
29. after reading these posts should we all come to the conclusion
that something is just not right. And after listening to the news PBS, they have no idea how Edwards supporters are going to lean to, let's keep them on edge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
32. Yeah it could have killed his career. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never_get_over_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
35. Ok I was a Kucinich supporter
Edwards was aways my second choice - and I decided to go with John after Iowa - I wanted to believe his rhetoric as it was progressive - but it turns out that Edwards is a big liar like all of them - he said he would stay in - now I don't really think I expected him to stay in until the convention but that he left 6 days before Super Tuesday SUCKS and makes no sense.

I am so sorry that I sent this man 100s of dollars

and curious

Why did he say he was suspending his campaign instead of saying he was ending it. Reminded me when Larry Craig said he "intended" to resign - when I heard that I said to myself - son of a bitch - that guy will not resign...and so far he hasn't....

hmmm suspending - what is up with that....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. elsewhere someone said it was to be able to pay campaign workers for a while? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never_get_over_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. Thanks
well as long as he is going to pay them for a while maybe he could have made today's statement next Wednesday - I'm so disappointed he didn't at least go that far...

oh well - at least he made it through my primary - because I wouldn't have voted for either Clinton or Obama....but on the other hand if I knew Edwards would pull out 24 hours after I voted I would have voted for Dennis....

I apologize Dennis....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
37. Can't say why- could be internals looked pretty bleak
But even if that's so, the timing of the decision left millions without a voice- or a reasonable alternative next week.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
40. I think he made a great strategic move
Does anyone really think that either Hillary or Obama will choose each other as VP if nominated? Why shouldn't Edwards pull back and wait for the two of them to chew each other up and at least get second prize this time around. He'd make a terrific VP and get the 8 years experience for the 2016 campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
44. I'm sure if he could have, he would have
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foxer Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
48. It would be "Historic" to elect the person not running.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
49. It would have been humiliating to go 0-for-26
He only had a chance to win in two or three states. They were considering quitting after New Hampshire. That is apparently when Elizabeth concluded there was no path to the nomination. Realistically, in retrospect, it was all over when he lost Iowa. The only way he would have a chance against the celebrity $100 million candidates was to win Iowa and use that momentum to do well in New Hampshire, couple the momentum with union backing (Culinary would have likely went for him, not Obama, if Edwards won Iowa) in Nevada and then wind South Carolina. This was the plan all along. The early state strategy allowed him to compete because of the retail nature of the early states. The idea always was to use momentum from the early states to lead to Super Tuesday success. Once he lost Iowa the plan fell apart. He would have trouble competing with the $100 million candidates the rest of the way, especially with no momentum and media coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toadzilla Donating Member (814 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
50. I wish he had stayed just to be in the debates!
he was so important in shaping them, in talking about real issues. so important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
51. He would have amassed delagates - coin of the realm
Personally, I think his results would have surprised (in a positive way)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC