Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Edwards "Beloved" By Lefties-Because He Was ONLY Candidate ALLOWED To Sound Angry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:03 PM
Original message
Edwards "Beloved" By Lefties-Because He Was ONLY Candidate ALLOWED To Sound Angry
Wednesday, January 30, 2008
The voice of anger

I probably should not post yet another horserace piece today, but Rachel Maddow, on Air America, just said something so compelling that it deserves to be recorded in cyber-ink. Why was John Edwards so beloved of hard lefties? Because he was the only Democrat in the race allowed to sound angry, and his populist outrage reflected the fury felt by all opponents of BushCo.

What do I mean by "allowed"?

Maddow claims that, when we confront an expression of anger, our unconscious mind reacts to it in terms derived from racial and sexual stereotypes. An angry white man is tough. An angry white woman is a shrew. An angry black man is scary. An angry black woman is crazy.

Intellectually, we know better than to accept these ludicrous stereotypes. But the forces at work here do not operate on an intellectual level. In American political life, the Id makes the rules, and those rules are not fair.

Neither Clinton nor Obama will ever give voice to your anger. They can't. For that reason, they will always feel like sell-outs, regardless of their actual voting records and stated positions on the issues.

http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2008/01/voice-of-anger.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good point. We are angry with good reason, after all. . . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LBJDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. What the fuck is a "leftie"?
Take your derogatory words elsewhere.

And if anything, Edwards was condemned for being a white male. There was nothing novel in his background to excite the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:06 PM
Original message
"Leftie" is a derogatory word? Since when? Where?
Not here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. When Rush uses it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Yeah, right. But he uses the word "liberal" in the same way, and that
doesn't mean that it is derogatory when a progressive person uses it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Nothing derogatory about leftie in my book. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. He sure wasn't loved by the "progressives". He was a moderate
according to them & that's worse than anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Damn good point.
And yet it did Edwards no good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Very true. But an angry woman is also a 'bitch' or a 'harradon'. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. Very interesting thoughts. Thank you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. I agree with this -- black men and women aren't allowed go sound angry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC