Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Something to ponder for those cheering the Kennedy endorsement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 07:44 PM
Original message
Something to ponder for those cheering the Kennedy endorsement
Regarding one of the memes put out there over and over (and over and over and...) over the last few weeks and months by Barack Obama and his supporters; that Hillary...and by extension, Bill...are divisive and polarizing. This has been touted as a reason to vote for Obama since he represents change, does not have the baggage that the Clintons do, will not rile up the whole of conservatism, etc...

I'm wondering if these meme-repeaters have even an inkling of the bile and invective that the right-wingers have had for Teddy Kennedy FOR FORTY YEARS. If you're getting rankled over a few DU'ers bringing up Chappaquiddick in jest, then you are in no way prepared for what would come in the General Election. No, Ted K. isn't running himself, nor will he be a close associate of a potential Obama administr6ation, as Bill would be to Hillary. But you can bet that the first negative ad campaign run by the GOP nominee will be images and recitations of this endorsement, run in red state markets. The "liberal lion" is still Public Enemy #1 in those parts, now and forever more.

So all in all, I just find it interesting that one of the primary reasons cited for Obama being the more effective candidate has pretty much been neutralized by this latest endorsement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is the fourth or fifth time I've seen this crapola here. Taylor Marsh
sending out the memos?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkansas Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. sour
grapes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. You'd have a point if Ted Kennedy were running for POTUS. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. you mean Ted won't be the co-president--??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. and that is why the clintons were on their knees begging for it
do you guys try to be clueless or does it come from trying to continue to prop up this increasingly bizarre Clinton campaign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. "on their knees begging for it..." care to prove that claim? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
33. why are Clinton supporters so stubborn that you have to document
reports that have been all over the internet and MSM?


Senator Edward Kennedy chooses Obama, spurning Bill Clinton plea


http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/01/28/america/28kennedy.php

Both the Clintons and their allies had pressed Kennedy for weeks to remain neutral, . . snip

The Clintons and their allies had reached out repeatedly to Kennedy, according to people familiar with the conversations, in the hope of at least keeping him neutral if they could not win his backing snip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. story goes that Obama had sore knees also
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. What an odd sense of deja vu I'm having
Almost as if I have read this very same posting several times already today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'll take that over rehashing Bill and Monica and impeachment any day.
Edited on Mon Jan-28-08 07:53 PM by sparosnare
If you don't think it's coming and all we'll hear from Republicans if Hillary gets the nomination, you're in la la land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. What crap. Tell me, did they run ads against Kerry highlighting TK's endorsement? No.
They simply bashed Kerry on his own "merits."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. No, because they had the Swiftboat liars. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. I wonder why Bill pleaded like a little girl with Ted to not endorse Obama
I'm sure he didn't want Ted to endorse his wife he's cheated on...

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I wonder why you're a bitter liar
Nah, actually I don't wonder. We already know. :rotfl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
31. bitter would be you, o projecting one... have a grape...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asthmaticeog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. Endorsements don't sway voters.
I don't know WHY the fuck DU has to have a flamewargasm to accompany every endorsement that gets announced. We're mostly politics junkies here, so yeah, we're interested in this stuff, but the world doesn't give a damn, and maybe rightly so. An endorsement from Ted Kennedy will not be Obama's Chappaquiddick. It'll hardly even register.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. You miss the point, predictably
Edited on Mon Jan-28-08 07:59 PM by Tarc
This has been the Obamaniacs' selling point here for months; Obama is for change, Obama is Hillary minus the polarizing baggage.

Then he goes out and gets himself endorsed by any even more polarizing figure than Bill Clinton.

Good job guys; shooting oneself in the foot saves your opponents the ammo. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asthmaticeog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. "Predictably?" I'm sorry, do we know each other?
I'm undecided, so this "Obamaniacs" label doesn't apply to me. Do you make it a habit to argue with phantomic enemies? Pretty neat how you got all that incorrect info from just my one post about endorsements, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. If it looks like a duck...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asthmaticeog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. So what's your point?
I'm lying about not being an Obama supporter because you failed to grasp the intent of my post about endorsements? My view remains the same whether it's Kennedy endorsing Obama or Sean Penn endorsing Kucinich. It doesn't matter nearly as much as a lot of DUers make it out to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. Told Mrs. ZBDent tonight ... the media will make this as the "kiss of death"
for Obama ... of course, anything Clinton is a "kiss of death" ... or, for that matter, anything Dem is a "kiss of death" ... and will lead to communism, socialism, and meteors crashing into the Earth ... yadda yadda yadda ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swoop Donating Member (169 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. No one is going to hold that against Obama.
My God, of all the people--he was in no way, shape, or form involved with Mary Jo and that whole thing. This is an asinine point that I don't even see rightwingers bringing up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Of course he wasn't involved, but that's not the point
The Rove machine pored over and parsed and minced John Kerry's Winter Soldier testimony and his service record in Vietnam. And you think they won't touch Obama for being linked to what they view as the worst liberal of all-time? It sucks but that's how politics works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swoop Donating Member (169 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Too much of a stretch.
When I see it, then I'll believe it. I don't expect to hear the charge HERE first....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
19. The people who would be turned off by Kennedy...
wouldn't vote for Obama anyways.

He's attracting people who normally don't care about politics, not the Dittoheads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. Well that would be the minority in this country, most of the country is somewhere in the middle.
Edited on Mon Jan-28-08 08:26 PM by demo dutch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. most of the country is apolitical
and doesn't really know or give a shit who Teddy Kennedy is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. Don't know about that, of all the politicians, Ted Kennedy is pretty well known.
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 11:22 AM by demo dutch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
20. Is that why Hillary sent Bill to beg for Kerry and Kennedy's endorsements?
Edited on Mon Jan-28-08 08:21 PM by ProSense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Ahh, the ever-famous "sources said..." BS from Pro(Non)Sense
Neither they, nor you, pass the smell test. Move along, kid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
23. Finally someone who gets it! Thank you! My Independent husband already announced
that he will vote for McCain, if Hillary doesn't get it. Formally from Mass, he feels that the Kennedy endorsement foreshadows a candidate in Obama, who is way too liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
26. Oh no! We'll lose the mouth breather vote!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
28. Gotta agree.
It definitely undermines Obama in the GE. Kiss Reagan Democrats goodbye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
30. ok wise sage... bwaaaaaaaa
weak weak weak....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC