Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Colorado/Mason-Dixon poll: O-34, C-32, E-17

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:21 PM
Original message
Colorado/Mason-Dixon poll: O-34, C-32, E-17
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 02:22 PM by BeyondGeography
Obama, Clinton split Colo. voters

...The Democratic caucuses hold more potential for high drama in the presidential race, with Colorado voters split evenly between Barack Obama at 34 percent and Hillary Rodham Clinton at 32 percent — well within the poll's 3.5 percentage-point margin of error. John Edwards was the choice of 17 percent of likely caucus-goers. Fourteen percent said they were still undecided.

Obama's strength in Colorado may come from the fact that the state's Democrats see the desire for change as a driving issue in the campaign. The poll showed 51 percent of Democrats see change as more important than experience — and the ability to bring change is a trait they overwhelmingly associate with the Illinois senator.
The issues on voters' minds are familiar, with the economy, the war, health care, immigration and homeland security topping the list. But poll results show those issues play very differently depending on party affiliation.

The war is the biggest issue on the minds of Democrats, but it ranks relatively low with Republicans. Immigration is an important issue with Republicans but not Democrats. And the economy, while important to voters of both parties, tops the list as the most important issue in the campaign because it is the biggest issue on the minds of unaffiliated voters. That group — more than a third of Colorado voters — won't be participating in the caucuses, however.

Democrats in the state have been predicting a heavy turnout for their caucuses this year after a calendar change moved up their vote to a week when the race is still on. In 2004 and 2000, Colorado Democrats voted so late that John Kerry and Al Gore had long since whipped the field...

...This poll was conducted by Mason-Dixon Polling & Research Inc. of Washington, D.C., from Jan. 21 to 23. A total of 800 registered Colorado voters were interviewed statewide by telephone. All stated they vote regularly in state elections.

Those interviewed were selected by the random variation of the last four digits of telephone numbers. A cross-section of exchanges was used in order to ensure an accurate reflection of the state. Quotas were assigned to reflect the voter turnout by county.

The margin for error, according to standards customarily used by statisticians, is no more than plus or minus 3.5 percentage points...

http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_8089114
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Looks like another death match.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is what Obama is looking for
Some competitive Super Tuesday states. He should be very happy. I would expect over the next few days for the majority of the Super Tuesday states (with the exception of a few obvious states) to become more competitive than polls have shown so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkansas Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. That is very good for Obama.
I am surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. 7 Super Tuesday states have had polls out in the past week
Despite the fact that everyone keeps saying this is going to be some sort of Clinton tidal wave, she leads in only 4 of those polls to Obama's 3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kermit77 Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Expect Clintons numbers to crater after the Kennedy endorsement
This is a turning point in the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. She'll win
I believe in the states with the larger number of delegates: California, New York, New Jersey, and Massachusetts. Probably Minnesota too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. ...
I would say you're probably correct on New York and New Jersey. Massachusetts can't be considered a lock for Clinton now that the Kennedys and John Kerry have come out for Obama. Minnesota? They're holding a caucus and I did hear someone say the other day that the Clinton team isn't going to focus on the caucus states as much as the primary ones. That's up for grabs. And then the big state though is California. If things keep moving in Obama's favor, don't be shocked if he grabs it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. I agree, I'm not absolutely confident
about Clinton winning California. I'd be interested to see a post S.C. poll to see if anything has changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. Independents vote in the Democratic side of the California primary, right?
I'm pretty sure they can.

Can anyone verify this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Kerry will be lucky to win his own seat.
No one cares what Caroline says. She is not active. If ted comes out for Obama It might move a vote or two. Not mine however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. "Kerry will be lucky to win his own seat."
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Oh dear. That's absurdly funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moses2SandyKoufax Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. LOL,
That's the dumbest thing I've seen posted on this board..... EVER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
33. which ones?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. how many delegates in CO?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. 71 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is pre-SC too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. Clearly Obama can only win in states with lots of black voters.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Yeah, like in Iowa.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. Just don't tell 'em he's the BLACK candidate
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
36. Heh
:D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think Obama will win Colorado, Utah, Idaho, and New Mexico
Basically, the Mountain States, on Feb. 5th. I'm basing this on his win in the rural counties of Nevada. Those states are similar to Nevada except for not having a large diverse city like Las Vegas. Hillary won Las Vegas; none of the Mountain States have a large city comparable to L.V.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Hell also take Georgia, Illinois
WHat he needs to do is compete in Jersey, CT, and maybe even win CA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. California and Missouri
Two most important states on Super Tuesday imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. I think Clinton will win those n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. I think my home state of Jersey is very important
Clinton should win pretty big. But if Obama can keep it close and take a lot of delegates, than that would be, in the words of Steve Douchey: Huuuuuuuuuuuggggggee!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. I agree there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. I expect Obama to win more than half of the Super Tuesday States
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. One word: Hispanics
supporting Obama in larger numbers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Are you saying they are?
I'm not so sure about that. What do you base your opinion on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
20. From his website, it looks like Obama has opened six offices in Colorado.
He wants it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
21. So much for him only leading in one state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
24. Should be interesting
Too bad I won't be there :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turn CO Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Too bad. And I can't caucus either
But my son is caucusing for Edwards, and I hope that John pulls in a few more delegates from this great state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thatsrightimirish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
29. I read somewhere once
That he gets more online donations from Colorado then anywhere else. If he wins the latino vote there I will feel much better about his potential candidacy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
30. Wow. I like.
Pre-bounce even. :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
31. Good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC