Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A concession speech is a sign of grace in defeat and fitness for public service

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 08:57 AM
Original message
A concession speech is a sign of grace in defeat and fitness for public service
When one refuses to give a concession speech in the face of an overwhelming rout then it means one lacks the ability to accept defeat with grace and move on to other battles.

It is just bad form.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Tell that to the first person who showed such bad form n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think you are trying to talk about Obama but he got more delegates in NV
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I am not upsete with Obama over this, but...
He didn't thank his supporters in Nevada for a victory either, most people think losing the populiar vote by 6% is more significant than winning one more delegate when well over 2,000 are needed to be nominated.

But I watched Obama's "concession speech" after NH live. It was his victory speech with one line congratulating Hillary for winning inserted at the front end. Obama said the tersest bare minimum admitting defeat and went on with what he planned to say when he won. It was commented on in the media at the time.

The way the OP framed this, it wasn't just about technically acknowledging defeat. Obama did in NH and Clinton did in SC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Nor did he acknowledge the will of the majority voters in Nevada
I heard a victory speech in NH too come to think of it, Same from Iowa.
And I didn't hear MSM getting bent over either of these.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. Unlike Obama, Hillary made them when she lost. Yes!, last night too. On my teevee
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 09:15 AM by robbedvoter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. Concession speeches are not relevant for primary presidential elections.
They are relevant for primary elections that eliminate the opponents from running in the general election.

They are relevant for general elections that result in the winner being declared and is considered elected.

Speeches after the results have come in should be considered only as campaign speeches if they continue to be in the running. The message in speeches by candidates that do not receive the top votes in a primary reflect on their campaign in that state but it also has points about what they will do in the next primary or primaries.

Only if a candidate has dropped out of the race should it be considered a concession speech and only to the point that it is to the candidates remaining in the race and not to a specific candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC