Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama vote was 3.6 to 1 Black to white, Edwards 15 to 1 W to B, Hill 1.5 to 1 W to B - is Hill the

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:46 PM
Original message
Obama vote was 3.6 to 1 Black to white, Edwards 15 to 1 W to B, Hill 1.5 to 1 W to B - is Hill the
Edited on Sat Jan-26-08 11:48 PM by papau
one that attracts a balanced non-racially divisive response? Edwards and Hillary got about the same number of White votes - splitting the 75% that did not go to Obama. Edwards got only 2% of the black vote. Obama got between high 78% and 80% of the Black vote.

Perhaps it is Hillary that can brings us together?

interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. It splits by gender lines with Hillary, racial lines with Obama.
Edwards gets a lot of white votes. Really, the country is split the fuck apart. At least, SC is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Perhaps SC does not determine what will happen...
on 2/5.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. papau, we need to get you out of the building -- fast.
It's about to be stormed by multiple armies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. LOL - It is a bad habit of mine - playing with numbers is what an actuary does!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Just the same, here -- put on this flame-retardant suit and we'll do the
best we can to spirit you to safety.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. LOL....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CalebHayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. no.
Add up the raw number of blacks and whites Barack got. Sure hill had a balanced number, but she got it out of a much smaller sample.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. Please. This IS South Carolina we are talking about....
Hardly a reflection of the US as a whole. There is going to be a bigger racial divide in a state like that. Let us not forget the white vote Obama managed to pull in Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. with 55 percent. he got black and white votes... use some common sense please.
Of course, the clinton camp wants to keep this racial war going because they think it helps them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. Obama got 25% of the White vote - both Edwards and Hillary each got 50% more than Obama - it is a
landslide win and congrats to Obama - and I am just looking at the implications of the exit poll numbers - but I do find it interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tulkas Donating Member (592 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. Got Iowa Numbers somewhere? You Know,,,,98% white state and Hillary finishes THIRD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. The Hillbots want to forget that one.. n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. LOL
The most twisted use of numbers I've ever seen.

She lost 80% of the black vote, for Christ's sake. How you spin that into praise for her diverse constituency is just amazing and lovable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angie_love Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. ha!!!!
LOL, I was just about to say the same thing. How does the OP spin a 80% loss of black vote into her being a candidate of unity? Funniest thing I've read all night
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. :-) A state split evenly between black and white (well 55/45 in the primary)- and only Hill's vote
is even close to B/W ratio in the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. Now wouldn't that be an interesting and surprising scenario?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. I don't know, but I'm really proud of all the blacks that
stood firm for both John and Hillary. That took a lot of courage, and integrity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. I'm not sure what that means?
if they voted for Obama do they lack courage and/or integrity? Is it more courageous to vote for someone other than your own race?

I am proud of anyone who voted based on issues regardless of skin and sex organs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Well said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. Oh come on...
you know as well as I do that a lot of the blacks voted because of 'racial pride' thing, nothing more. I personally respect the people who did NOT vote because of that. It's a shallow reason, and may just be a hollow victory.

I'm almost to the point where I say; fuck it. Let him get elected, so we can watch him crash and burn. Because he will. Maybe then people will see what the rest of us saw from the start; nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #27
36. I agree voting for race alone would be bad
I don't assume that all blacks who voted for Obama voted because of it, and I'm not "proud" of blacks who voted for Clinton or Edwards just because they voted for the non-black. If the voted for C or E because they liked Clinton's or Edward's positions on issues, great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. Obviously some did just that, and that's what I'm saying....
You missed my point. I said I was proud that they stood firm. Meaning, there were concrete reasons they had chosen those candidates, and nothing swayed them. That's why I am proud of them.

There was a story in the paper today, about a black woman,(Haitian) who was torn between Obama and Hillary. She was going back and forth in the car on the way to the polling place...... Well, here read it, but that's what I'm saying. She went with the issues that were important to her, which is the way it should be, not by race.

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/breaking_dade/story/394171.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #38
41. ok, I think the words courage and integrity just came across wrong to me
Maybe that just came across a bit harsh to me, as though none of them voted for Obama based on issues. Maybe it was just less obvious to me that they "did just that" but maybe I'm being naive. It was probably, as the poster below says, a bit of both.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. Black people and women have been voting "regardless of skin and sex organs" for quite awhile
It's beem white men who have been consistently voting for people who look like them.

Why is it that, now, the first time that a woman and a black candidate are viable players, we are now being told that it is somehow aberrant, unconscionable and even racist for US to vote for someone who looks like us and if we do, it must mean we aren't voting based on issues? White men have been voting for other white men for centuries. Have THEY been voting based on skin and sex organs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #28
35. maybe what I said didn't come across how I meant it
I'm saying I don't like the whole premise of people voting based on race or sex, or the premise that you can take voting results and assume that blacks voted for Obama *because* of his race, anymore than you can say whites voted for Clinton or Edwards because they voted for a white person (or against the black guy). I don't give anyone bonus points for voting "for" or "against" their own race. What makes me "proud" is when people analyze candidates based on issues, which may or may not make their vote align with the race or sex this time around.

I think we agree but I'm not explaining it very well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. I think people can do both
Black voters are very savvy and very discerning. We vote on the issues. But when you have to choose between two candidates who are both very good, are great on all or most of the issues we care about, and would both be excellent presidents, we - like most voters - look to other, intangible "tiebreakers." Which one do I most identify with, which one better understands people like me, etc. And, no matter people try to shake it, for a black voter making such a choice, the fact that one of the candidates is black is a rational, logical consideration. Not just because their skin looks like ours, but for all manner of reasons, including what having a black president could say to the world.

(if it were all about race, Al Sharpton would have done much better in the South Carolina primary in 2004 and Alan Keyes would be more than just a joke)

So, while black voters vote on the issues, the fact that a candidate is excellent on the issues AND black does make a difference. The same thing applies to women candidates and women voters - a candidate's gender isn't the sole reasons women vote for her, but it could be the tipping point. And there's nothing wrong with that at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. The difference this time is, Obama is not like Sharpton, or Jackson...
and obviously has a chance. That's the difference.

I'd like to address your post above, but I need more facts, but off the top of my head, it would seem blacks were voting for white presidents too....I just don't know nationwide, what the numbers are for white/black voters. I doubt it has ever been about race before though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. Do you have the numbers by gender, please? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #16
29. O got 55% of both M & F, Clinton 23% of M & 30% of F, E was 23/16 M/F
39% male, 61% female split of total vote.

a little over 530k total votes cast.

There does not appear to be a war of the sexes going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. I was curious how African American females broke. Thanks n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. African American females voted exactly the same as African American males - 80% for Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #34
40. Much obliged. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. Obama/Clinton/Edwards in '08!!!
It's a threefer! We'll get ALL the votes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
18. to assess this, I need to know the % of black, white, and other citizens and democrats in SC? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #18
30. 55% of the 530k votes were cast by blacks, 61% of the total were cast by women
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. thanks n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
19. Factor in Clintons losing Iowa and Obama splitting NH (he got RURAL votes)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
22. Interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tulkas Donating Member (592 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
26. This Is The Largest Margin Of Victory In a S.C. Dem Primary In History


Try to belittle it all you want. She lost and she lost badly. More than 2-1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #26
32. Jesse Jackson won a caucus - not primaries - in 84/88 - so a comparison can't be made
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
42. "Perhaps it is Hillary that can brings us together?"
NO WAY!

Everything that surrounds The Bush and The Clinton families is *TOXIC.*

It's time to wrest "the old guard" out of the political ruling class. :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
43. Can you break it down by age?
I thought I read somewhere Hillary got the over 65 people and Obama had a larger age range. I'd love to see the numbers if you have them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. Obama won majority of white voters under age 30
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Thanks! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
44. obama won south carolina......What did he win? Really.....
Will obama and the media be able to swiftboat the clintons again in any of the 2/5 states?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #44
46. Kurtz on Reliable sources today suggested CW would be it's a rejection of Bill Chlinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC