Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's a fact, Jesse Jackson won South Carolina twice in the primaries

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:39 PM
Original message
It's a fact, Jesse Jackson won South Carolina twice in the primaries
"Those Who Forget History Are Doomed to Repeat It"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. What's your point?
And don't give me any crap about SC being an "outlier".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, we'll nominate Mondale AND Dukakis
and get our ass beat TWICE because of it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The only Dem to win in decades is Clinton
It's a fact!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. And that's only because of The Perot Factor
had Perot not stripped off enough GOP votes in 1992, he wouldn't have won.

Bill Clinton never won with a majority of the electorate. And he lost control of congress in 1994.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. And he deformed welfare, passed NAFTA, telecommunications act, etc.
He was a right of center president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. He was the best Repbublican president since Eisenhower
He made Nixon look downright liberal in some ways
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. false
every analysis I've seen shows Perot split the vote - and Clinton would've won without him in the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Perot drew more from conservatives than liberals
according to Wikipedia:


A detailed analysis of the voting demographics revealed that Perot's support drew heavily from across the political spectrum, with 20% of his votes coming from self-described liberals, 27% from self-described conservatives, and 53% coming from self-described moderates.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ross_Perot#1992_presidential_candidacy

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. That's a fun factoid
but it doesn't mean Clinton would've lost without Perot in the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LowerManhattanite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Those were caucuses...a bit different. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Did he win Iowa and the delegate count in NV and a tie in NH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. actually I believe that he did not win primaries
at that time they were cacuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. In 2004 it was Edwards. Sharpton came in second.
campaigned there with Roger Stone money to push Clark off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheney Killed Bambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. Er, NO
They were caucuses. In 84 and 88 SC held caucuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. Exactly right
The eventual establishment candidates who lost SC those years got their asses kicked in landslides in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. Go ahead and keep playing the race card. It's proven so effective in SC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. What the hell does that have to do with Obama? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustinL Donating Member (439 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. It's a fact, Jesse Jackson lost Iowa twice in the caucuses
Mondale won in 1984 and Gephardt won in 1988.

link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC