Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why does Hillary insist on trying to move the goalposts everytime she's pinned back?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:43 PM
Original message
Why does Hillary insist on trying to move the goalposts everytime she's pinned back?
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 04:01 PM by Wolsh
First it was in Nevada after she failed to get the union endorsement she coveted

Now, because she can't win delegates in contested elections, she's desperate enough to abandon her pledge and backstab the DNC in order to once again change the rules in Michigan and Florida.

She'll really say or do anything to make sure she gets her turn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. and more importantly why do some of us support some one who has to cheat in order to have a chance
at winning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. A large portion of the Hillary supporters think that.....
......the only way to beat the Republicans is by acting like Republicans.

I dont think they understand how their hatred of the GOP has corrupted them into being no better than the GOP.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. very well put.
I suspect the majority hates what america has become, in some ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringBigDogBack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
35. beautiful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yawn. Your anti-Clinton OPs used to be interesting,,,
Now you just pointlessly grasp for straws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. She makes it to easy.
If I had to make stuff up, then it would be more interesting. Now that everyone can see through her bullshit, I'm just posting what everyone not brainwashed is thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Because she's a uniter not a divider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringBigDogBack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
36. lmao
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Clinton branch of the party despises the Dean branch that currently runs the DNC
Dean put his foot down on principle regarding FL and MI. The Clintons (through surrogates) tried to get Dean removed as chair of the DNC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Yup -- it's the DEMOCRATIC Party, not the CLINTON Party!
Dean's election as chair was the best thing to happen to the party in a decade and now the Clintons want to undo that to advance their own power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
33. Thats all they are interested in: Advancing their own power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. What goalposts? It's about Democrats and their primary voting rights.
All the candidates had better demand that Michigan and Florida delegates be recognized and seated at the convention.

What a disgraceful undemocratic posture by the world's leading democracy! Yeah, right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Remember, Hillary was the one that said Florida "didn't count" when she thought she was going to wa
Its not about that at all. It's about Hillary looking down the road and seeing that she's not going to be able to get a fair delegate win without getting delegates from places where she was the only candidate on the ballot or where no campaigning was done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. It's not about Hillary or Obama or Edwards except that they must together demand that their voters..
....and the delegates the voters elected must be counted. It's about democracy - everyone's vote counts, a concept that seems to escape rabid partisans around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yes Obama has an insurmoutable 2 delegate lead with only 3100 delegates to be decided!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. That is her character maybe?
But certainly not the character of anyone I would want as President. Karl Rove in a pansuit....Can you tell I like that quote??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. DUers used to like having votes count
but when Clinton suggests it, it's somehow venal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Counting votes from elections with only one candidate on the ballot
or where no campagining has taken place isn't really, "voting" is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. There will be 8 Democratic candidates on the Florida ballot
but don't let the facts get in the way of making shit up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Don't let reading my posts get in the way of you talking out of your ass
If you opened the damn post you would have read this: "or where no campagining has taken place isn't really, "voting" is it?"


It would have taken way too much effort to read the entire two line post, right?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. You said there was only one name
on the ballot. Either ignorant or lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Why are you lying about this?
How many times does it have to be pointed out that ALL the names are on the ballot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Somebody else who can't read a post
The subject is about michigan, the body of the thread is about Florida. Use your brain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. There were 4 names on the MI ballot.
There was also a concerted effort by surrogates to pump up the vote for undecided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Michigan had four names on the ballot
you're batting zero here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. Where do you specify Michigan?
Or am I supposed to read your small mind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. I'm sorry you can't be trusted with simple reading comprehension
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. I asked where you specified MI
Got a problem answering simple questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. MI had 4 Democrats on the ballot. FL will have 8.
In FL, unions and grassroots efforts have been underway for all of the big 3 though the candidates cannot participate directly other than doing fundraisers.

Obama is currently the only candidate with TV advertising running.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. "DUers used to like having votes count"
........now that Clinton thinks she might need those delegates she suggests counting them after agreeing they wouldnt count.

Well were seeing through her bullshit and saying she's wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. There's no evidence for that assertion at all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
34. Not if they don't apply to their candidate
I think we will need these states in the GE and she is smart to try to minimize the alienation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. Because "she will do anything and say anything to get elected."
It's simple, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tokenlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Agreed!!!
The Clintons are turning so many people off right now that used to admire them. It is really sad that they think they can do this without future ramifications. Sometimes you can really go too far--and if she succeeds at this--their presidency will be damaged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
19. because rules don't apply to her
she is 'the chosen one'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
20. What goalposts?
She has made a request to seat the delegates. A request. You know, like the request that Obama made so his ads would show up in FL. What pledge has she abandoned? You guys are foaming at the mouth for stupid reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
george_maniakes Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #20
37. So let me get this straight...
as far as i understand it, the candidates agreed that the delegates from florida and michigan wouldnt count because those states violated party rules. Now Clinton wants those delgates to count. Am I correct or incorrect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. You are correct
and you attribute the most nefarious motives to it because you don't like Hillary. I don't. I think the Dems are going to need to win FL and I know I'd be more likely to bother to vote if a candidate showed some concern for having my voice heard. Clinton and Edwards are using state bought ads while Obama is using a national ad knowing it would show in FL (I don't care that one person in SC from the DNC told him it was okay). YOu choose to see nothing wrong there. It's all perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC