Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So now, Clinton wants MI and FL delegates seated.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:36 PM
Original message
So now, Clinton wants MI and FL delegates seated.
Clinton wants Michigan, Florida delegates to get convention seats
1/25/2008, 1:46 p.m. EST
By KATHY BARKS HOFFMAN
The Associated Press

LANSING, Mich. (AP) — Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton wants delegates from Michigan and Florida to be seated at this summer's Democratic National Convention.

Although the Democratic National Committee's Rules Committee stripped Michigan and Florida of their delegates as punishment for moving up their presidential primaries, Clinton said Friday that she plans to ask her convention delegates to support seating the delegations.

"I believe our nominee will need the enthusiastic support of Democrats in these states to win the general election," she said in a statement, adding that it's important that "we have all 50 states represented and counted at the Democratic convention."

http://www.mlive.com/newsflash/michigan/index.ssf?/base/politics-1/1201281691181690.xml&storylist=michigannews

I knew she was going to be bad but not THIS bad.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. I bet my left nut, she gets it. Too bad no one else could play in MI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I bet you're right but hope it comes at no physical cost to you.
lol

When I saw her name stay on the ballot, my belly flipped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Not that I want your left nut, but I think that Obama and Edwards will have alot to say about this..
...before it is settled...

My bet, she won't get the votes, and screws the party anyway..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
31. Why the hate against the LEFT nut? Why doesn't anyone ever bet their RIGHT nut?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. You know...
you really should check the board...there are about 5 threads on this already...

Yawwwnnnn..............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thank you for rousing yourself to add nothing to this thread!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. If the Party gives in, Im out of this Party
I will not allow myself to remain a member of a Party that has no scruples and allows a political opportunist to add uncontested delegates into her total so she can gain an unjust advantage over her rivals.

I will reregister as an independant after my vote is cast against her in the California primary.
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. How are the FL delegates uncontested?
I agree about MI - but FL? Please explain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Hasn't the DNC stripped FL of their delegates for moving the primary?
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 03:45 PM by sfexpat2000
:shrug:

/oops
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. How are the FL delegates uncontested?
No campaigning is taking place there.

In unstances where the voters dont get the opportunity to know the candidates they tend to vote on name recognition.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. Are Floridians in a bubble?
Are you expecting nobody to go out and have their voice heard regardless of the delegates? Do you really think there is someone left in this country that doesn't know the name Obama? How stupid do you think the people in FL are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. I don't think it's about stupidity. It's about conflicting messaging.
Your vote counts. It doesn't count. It might count. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. So they'll turn down the REQUEST
At least Floridians will know somebody cared enough about their votes to fight for their delegates being seated. That could make the difference in November or don't you care about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Oh, please. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. So you're okay
with the FL Dems thinking nobody cares about their vote. Gotcha. That'll be a big help in November. Just what state will Obama go for to counteract that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. I'd like a milkshake to go with that straw and I do not support Obama.
Hillary didn't care about their vote either until she did, capiche?

This is exactly what I love about the Clinton campaign. No compunction about using anyone at any time for the most expedient any reason. You guys are as transparent as water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. For me the sin is, the voters are being cut out of the process.
I admire fighters. But this is going 'way beyond putting up a good fight. This is going around the electorate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yeah, right to vote - so disgusting! let's recount NH some more though, shall we?
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 03:48 PM by robbedvoter
Political party should trump constitutional rights - but maybe the name of the party needs changing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Bullshit. MI voters were told their votes would garner no delegates.
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 03:53 PM by sfexpat2000
And Fl voters have been told the same.

Game someone else.

On edit: I won't change what I posted so people can see it. But, that was rude of me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. The right to vote should be restored to all voters - MI. Fla, everyone.
It's what Hillary asks. It's the first of her stands I like. It's more than the 2 Johns did for me in 2004.
Party squabbles should NOT affect voting rights. Deal with the persons who conceivably broke rules, not with the voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Yeah. Hillary has found election reform religion just at the moment
when it can benefit her.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. "Political party should trump constitutional rights" - Clintons should
have been fighting this for months and refused to cooperate with the idea of not seating delegates from Florida, if they feel that strongly about it.

I thought all the Democratic candidates agreed to this prior to the start of the primary season. Waiting until four days before the primary seems to involve more than a commitment to constitutional rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Earlier would have been even better. it's not like she wouldn't win Fla anyway.
It's a valid stand - and it makes me consider voting for her. See my handle?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. You need to change your user name immediately
if you are advocating for robbed voters being forced to hand over their vote to Hillary by default.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
37. That makes no sense at all
If Hillary wins FL, delegates counted or not, it will be because Floridans voted for her. Hell, unlike MI, the other names are on the ballot, so there's no "default" involved.

It's a VERY smart move for her to advocate for FL to get delegates. Even if she weren't probably going to win the state. If she wins the nomination, she will be able to say, "I fought for your right to be counted." Will Obama be able to claim as much?

We sure could use FL's electoral votes in our column. Seems to me we have a greater chance of getting them in 2008 than we've had in a while. Why would ANYone want to throw them away?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. These people are crooks and liars!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mathewsleep Donating Member (824 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. they should not get there delegates because
there wasn't a fair fight in either of those states. obama and edwards weren't even on the ballet in michigan. to give them there delegates wouldn't be fair to all the candidates that wern't on the ballet. she only wants them to be seated to help herself. she doesn't give two rat fucks about their votes being counted. if she lost michigan she wouldn't want they votes to be counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. If there is some way those delegates could be seated AND
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 04:03 PM by sfexpat2000
have it be fair to the contestants, they should be.

Hillary wants to pocket them in an unfair manipulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mathewsleep Donating Member (824 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. agreed and
agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. It not unfair.
They are all on the ballot in Florida.

Hillary got 55 % of the vote in Michigan - Uncommitted got 40%. The percentage of difference in delegates (of the 156ish MI was stripped) would be small. Uncommitted delegates could go to Edwards or Obama.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. You can't count MI at all without overlooking all the voters
who believed their vote wouldn't count.

And FL is little different.

The ethics of the Clinton campaign are nauseating. You must have a really strong stomach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. Lots of people were disenfranchised in MI - there were robocalls telling
people the Dem primary was cancelled too. We still need to seat the delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Is there a way to separate the two issues? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
D-Sooner Donating Member (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
24. I would say this shocks me, but
the fact is I saw it coming a mile away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
32. This is her play to win Florida.
Just in case they get seated at the convention she wants to make sure she wins the state. "See Florida... I stuck up for you... vote for me!". Obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Yep. Same with MI. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
36. The Clintons show they have no respect for the DNC or the rules.
They want the DNC to be exactly like the DLC, the base be damned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC