Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barack Obama will NOT be Vice Presidential Candidate for Hillary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:10 AM
Original message
Barack Obama will NOT be Vice Presidential Candidate for Hillary
this is just not going to happen. first of all, Hillary will probably not even consider him. Evan Bayh or Tom Vilsack are the types she will consider.

and even if there was some chance she would consider him, Obama would not accept it.

if Obama is on the national ticket it will only be at the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. If the Clintons come the conclusion that they need Obama to win enough
of an alienated AA vote, they'll offer him the spot, and odds are he'll take it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. I tend to agree. I would like such a ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
45. I don't think he will be asked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. As an Obama supporter
do you think this would be a wise decision for him? I think it would be both unwise and disappointing, but I am curious what's your take on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
31. I think this would be the same disaster for Obama
that it was for Al Gore. The Clintons are everything Obama's campaign is fighting.
If he sells out by accepting a VP nod from Hillary, he is signaling he is really just another politico and
nothing more. He will have sold out his supporters as well as his values.

If he would run with her, I will not support either of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Thank you
we agree. By the way, I think it would be (much) worse than for Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #31
41. Funny, I thought we were ALL fighting against the Repugs ....
Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Actually, I am fighting for the return of representative democracy.
I look for it where I find it. If the Democratic Party has sunk to the same tactics to be elected and to govern as the right,
then I will look elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Feel free to take your wagon and go home
I'm a Democrat. I'll still be a Democrat after the primaries are over.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. You are then an example of tribalism at its best.
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 02:04 PM by Big Blue Marble
Your party right or wrong. You might want to consider how that thinking is a lot like Bush's 30%ers.


Edit to add. I have and I will always support constitutional government and representative democracy over any party.
To do less, is to fail our country and our people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. You can console yourself with your ideological purity
But I'm more concerned about long term things that matter - like the next few Supreme Court nominees. Having a Dem White House to go along with a Dem majority Congress.

And I'm dead serious. There are way too many "if Hillary gets the nom I'll stay home" types around here these days. You people act like Hillary and the Clintons are the devil incarnate. I've got news for you. It's BushCo that's the devil incarnate, and what they've done to the country in the past 7 1/2 years, that is the real enemy.

I'm not a fan of Obama. But if he's our eventual nominee, I'll vote for him.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. You are right.
I do not think there is much difference between HRC and GWB when it comes to how she will govern.
And I predict neither will you if it comes to that.

As to the SC, I have voted and voted and voted for Democrats to protect the Supreme Court.

A Democratic Congress brought us Thomas, Roberts and Alito. Why would should I trust that
the Democrats are going to protect our courts.

That argument is always used as a red herring to keep us in line. And our choices just get worse and worse.

This time I will vote my principles because it may be all I have left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. What Democratic Congress?????
It wasn't the Dems in Congress who handed us Roberts and Scalito! Hellooooooo; they were nominated by a Puke Prez and confirmed by a Puke Senate.

Thomas was nominated by a Puke Pres also.

Whatever you're smoking, keep it to yourself.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. Sorry, I misspoke.
The Dems in the Repuke controlled Senate could have filibustered both Roberts and Alito. You know the way that
the Repuke minority stops cold so much of the Dems aggenda in this Senate.

They chose instead to rollover, kinda like they are doing now.

Thomas on the other hand was approved by a Democratic Senate. He easily could have been stopped by a filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh yes Obama will gladly take the shared Ticket .
It's the only way America can get to know him... Bill Clinton will become his mentor, and prepare him for President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I hope not..I, for one insist we have a Left leaning Democrat for VP
Obama isn't enough of a Democrat to qualify for Hillary's VP. I'm thinking more in line with Biden. We need strong players capable of getting this country back to a Democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. It may come down to the practical details
and Obama can bring Money and Young Voters...Obama still has to evolve...he can become a great democrat with the right training.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I know..
you know the meaning of "reverse barrier precautions"..:)

Obama and Kerry's punishment would be having to support Hillary as the Dem Nominee and campaign for her against the Repukes. Just imagine how the prospect of campaigning for Hillary is sitting in their craw right now as we type. Unless, they really fully go over to the dark side and support Mitt. Kerry and Romney have always been good buds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. that is such crap
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 06:16 AM by JI7
unlike the Clintons , Kerry and Obama fully support the Democratic Nominee every time.

and it's Clinton who is good buds with people like Old man Bush .

it is interesting that even Hillary supporters think she sucks so bad that supporting her is considered punishment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. Put down the Kool-Aid. You're having a hard time keeping even the Lies straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. I know of what you are capable of
and still you manage to surprise. Quite an acomplishment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. bwahahaha. Aside from the FACT that Obama's record is left leaning
he's the tenth most liberal Senator- Hill will NEVER pick a left leaning dem for VP, and your silly little insistence on it will hardly change that, ducky. Biden won't change a powerful spot in the Senate for a VP spot, and face it, Hill's VP will be the ultimate back bencher. And of course anyone that thinks the Clinton crew is a plus for democracy is nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. But you can't deny Obama has done a 180 shift in his message
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 07:18 AM by Tellurian
pandering to Republicans and Evangelicals..besides the fact the nucleus of Obama's campaign is mainly comprised of Bush operatives and supporters. Obama have vigorously put forth a Republican agenda, dissing Boomers, the GLBT community catering to and promoting the RW agenda..as he asks for help building his Kingdom.

You might consider stowing the vitriol and invective when addressing me, otherwise, you'll be talking to yourself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
40. That's it!
"besides the fact the nucleus of Obama's campaign is mainly comprised of Bush operatives and supporters."

That settles it. You either have serious problems, in which case you have all my sympathy, or hopefully and much more likely, you are playing the whole of DU for fools, and have lots of fun at our expense. Not very laudable, but hey, if that's what makes you happy....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
water Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. He would balance the ticket, making Republicans much more willing to vote for Clinton.
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 07:24 AM by water
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. In your dreams.
The Republicans will not go near Clinton no matter whom she picks for VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
23. Biden is considerably to the right of Obama
I hope that Obama is not faced with the decision to either be part of what will likely be a dirty Clinton campaign or be seen as not joining the team when he is needed to mend the rift.

It bothers me that many good people will be put in a position to support this corrupt couple because the alternative in this troubled time is unthinkable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardson08 Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
56. Ed Rendell or Bill Richardson for VP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. When Obama runs ads stating "Hillary will do anything to win" he's
burning bridges bigtime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes, he is..Obama's been caught recanting lies so many times
He's an embarrassment to the Dem Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Hopefully, you're right
He has a great political future; aligning himself with the Clintons would permanently tarnish it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
53. His political future...
Was tarnished beyond repair for many millions of people when he did his Fundie gay baiting turn, months ago. To me, since then, he has been the same as any Republican running for office, bashing gays and other Democrats and praising and being praised by Republicans.
I do not allign my vote with the religous right, ever. When Obama comes to CA, he's going to learn how much most Democrats like lunatic preachers and evangelists who hurl stones of verbal abuse at whatever minority is upsetting them that day. He saw it in New Hampshire and in Nevada. He made a crass and vile trade off, bigots in one region for Democrats across America. He made his bed, let him sleep in it.
My opinion of him is based soley on his own actions, alliances and voting record. He is Hillary+McClurkin.
A heavily compromised and tarnished man, whose desperation and impatient attitude lead him to attempt that for which he was not prepared. Plenty of experience to be Pres, not nearly enough to get elected. Back in July, he thought he had votes to burn, he was free to toss the gays and insult the boomers. I bet he wishes he'd had a few thousand more votes in NH and Nevada, don't you? Hubris and prejudice will cost him the office.

Edwards 2008-the only Democrat still running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
10. before you shut off that crystal ball of yours...
... can you pass along those winning numbers this week?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. No crystal ball here, but I suspect that "Obama Movement" advisers
will convince him to leave the Dem Party and challenge Hillary in 2012 as an independent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
14. Agree
Both on Obama and the types that may be willing to accept the position of vice-vice-president on a Clinton x 2 ticket. I have said it before, and I strongly believe it, that I think it would be very difficult to find powerful, effective and very qualified people that would be willing to assume the key positions in a Clinton administration, and that includes VP, State, Defense, and maybe more. If she gets the nod, I hope I will be proven wrong, because if I am right it would mean a weak and confused administration. NOT what we need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. get real -
I realize that hatred of all things Clinton has the ability to cloud judgement, but the idea that a Clinton admin. would be unable to find "powerful, effective and very qualified people" is just nonsense.

Democrats have been in the wilderness for eight years now and there aren't ANY who wouldn't jump at the chance to serve in a Democratic administration, no matter who our nominee is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #28
39. I think the risk is very real
my point, maybe not very well expressed, is simply that the power structure in a Clinton administration would be too confused and confusing because of Bill. There should be no problem finding good people for the positions that he is less likely to take an interest in. But if you think that he will be only involved in Christmas decorating and funerals, you are mistaken. Again, I sincerely hope I am wrong, I mean it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cgrindley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
15. I think you're delusional
the ticket WILL be Clinton/Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. ..
I hope it's Clinton/Obama..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
18. Of course he would accept the VP slot if it were offered to him
he's an ambitious politician,they all are.The hyperdrive emotionalism concerning candidates here on DU is not indicative of political reality.Politicians do not take their ball and go home to the detriment of their political careers.If,in the future, it looks like Clinton will be the candidate,I expect you will start seeing a severe ratcheting down of the acrimony between the two of them.Personally,I hope it's offered to him and he accepts,of course,the stench of the republicans collectively shitting their pants in unison,would be an added bonus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
21. He was running for VP from the very begining. The unexpected level of HillaryHate "change"d that.
It's obvious he never expected to be a frontrunner for the top spot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fabio Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
24. I agree with that now
based on watching their (poor) chemistry over the last few months. But there was always an intentional detente between the camps through the summer when I think they were sizing each other up for a possible combo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
25. I'm hoping for Jim Webb
Gov. Kaine can appoint another Dem senator, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
26. problem
The only problem with Obama as VP is that we won't be able to have him on the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
29. I do think that he would accept if offered
I'm not sure it would be offered, though.

It has been the pattern in the Dem party recently for the runnerup to get the VP nod.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
30. If she honored him by asking him to be her VP, he'd be nuts to refuse it
considering he might actually be ready for the BIG job after being Hillary's VP for the next 8 years. At least by then he'd have some experience. First she has to ask him, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. What experience does Hillary have again?
Oh yeah, how to keep the corporate masters happy....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Let's just say it's about 1000 times more than Obama has.
Imagine Obama having to go up against the likes of McCain. He'd get raked over the coals so fast he wouldn't know what hit him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Oh, this must be what your talking about...
But during those two terms in the White House, Mrs. Clinton did not hold a security clearance. She did not attend National Security Council meetings. She was not given a copy of the president’s daily intelligence briefing. She did not assert herself on the crises in Somalia, Haiti and Rwanda.

And during one of President Bill Clinton’s major tests on terrorism, whether to bomb Afghanistan and Sudan in 1998, Mrs. Clinton was barely speaking to her husband, let alone advising him, as the Lewinsky scandal sizzled.

In seeking the Democratic presidential nomination, Mrs. Clinton lays claim to two traits nearly every day: strength and experience. But as the junior senator from New York, she has few significant legislative accomplishments to her name. She has cast herself, instead, as a first lady like no other: a full partner to her husband in his administration, and, she says, all the stronger and more experienced for her “eight years with a front-row seat on history.”

http://patterico.com/2007/12/31/hillary-vs-obama-on-foreign-policy-experience/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. That is what Al Gore thought in 92.
How did it work out for him? The Clintons use and discard people.
I would be very disappointed in Obama if he fell for that ruse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJObamaWoman Donating Member (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #30
44. Please he would be crazy to accept it. the GOPs want HRC to be
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 01:56 PM by NJObamaWoman
the candidate. She is going to get creamed and Obama shouldn't have any part of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #30
50. Big mistake. The last time a sitting VP won the presidency
was papa Bush in 1988 and he lasted only one term.

It is very difficult for a person who is in the background for 8 years, not speaking unless told to, being associated with the White House scandals - and there always are - all of a sudden to emerge as a leader with a mind of his own.

If he does accept the VP post, after his term ends he should go out to build a name for himself and then try to run on his own record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
37. You're right. Hillary Clinton will continue serving New York in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
48. He should not. Nor should Clinton be his running mate
Two senators will be a disastrous ticket. Either should have a military person as a running mate. Wes Clark for Clinton and I've read here someplace about Webb for Obama.

No, if Obama is not the nominee, he should go back to Illinois and run for governor - and I've heard that he could win, and then come back, in 2016 or - if the worse has happened - in 2012 now as a more mature with executive experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
54. I'm sure the "promised" the VP slot to Wes Clark to entice him away from running himself...
But I'm sure Wes has already figured out that he's now in a very, very long line of people who have been betrayed by Clinton promises over their career of ambtion.

Wes Clark was played as a fool. No wonder we don't see him that much anymore.

Wes is to the Clintons as Colin Powell was to the Bushes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
55. Boy Bahy and Vilsack will sure help enthuse the African-American community and young voters that
Obama has brought into the voting places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
57. Do you have a link for this? Or is this JUST ANOTHER DU OPINION PIECE?
Please let us know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC