Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Zogby Thursday Only Numbers: Obama 36% Clinton 31% Edwards 19%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:33 AM
Original message
Zogby Thursday Only Numbers: Obama 36% Clinton 31% Edwards 19%
I'm posting this to make a point how silly everyone was jumping up and down yesterday in a frenzy over Edwards sudden 1 day surge in the Wednesday sample of Zogby's poll. Looks like Clinton has the surge now.

http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1434

More evidence that the race is tightening down the stretch: Thursday’s polling alone had Obama leading with 36%, but Clinton was just five points back at 31% (a good day for her). Edwards came in with 19% yesterday alone. The one-day sample was not enough to draw sweeping conclusions, but it is an indicator that this race continues to change.

In case you were wondering about the effectiveness of former President Clinton’s campaign work on behalf of his wife, here is an indication: South Carolina Democrats hold an overwhelmingly positive view of Bill Clinton – yesterday’s polling alone shows he has a 75% favorable rating, compared to just 20% who hold an unfavorable view of him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting. So Zogby goes on an average?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. yup, it's a 3 day rolling average weighted about equally
every day one day is deleted, and one day added.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. for once I agree with you.
Looks like Hillary had a good day on Thursday and Edwards had a good day on Wednesday. But Zogby does point out that Edwards is the only one who has been making consistent gains over the three days, in Edwards case he is slowly gaining with black voters and among undecideds. And overall, according to Zogby, Obama continues to lead in every region and among most key demo groups. But in less than 48 hours we will know for sure who the winner in SC is and by how much and who comes in second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yukari Yakumo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. What's the M.o.E.?
Won't it put HRC and BHO in a virtual tie in SC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I think it's 3.4 and yes it would be a virtual tie then for Thursday
but it can be both ways too. It could mean that Obama and Hillary are 32-31 or it could mean that Obama's five point edge on Thursday is actually 8-points. Plus or minus 3.4%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AJH032 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. I've rarely found Zogby to be accurate
seems like they get it wrong more than most polling organizations out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Zogby is pretty accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
8. K/R
looking better each day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. Did they change the article? I dont see those numbers on the linked story??? n/y
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC