LINK to New York Times endorsement of Hillary Clinton

[MoonRiver]

(and McCain :()

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/24/the-times-editorial-board-endorsements/

[Politicub]

1. Woo hooooooo!!!

What a fantastic endorsement. Go, Hillary, go!!

[MoonRiver]

2. Awesome, and right on!

:woohoo:

[Fresh_Start]

3. Senator Clinton, PAY ATTENTION to this advice

As strongly as we back her candidacy, we urge Mrs. Clinton to take the lead in changing the tone of the campaign. It is not good for the country, the Democratic Party or for Mrs. Clinton, who is often tagged as divisive, in part because of bitter feeling about her husband’s administration and the so-called permanent campaign. (Indeed, Bill Clinton’s overheated comments are feeding those resentments, and could do long-term damage to her candidacy if he continues this way.)

[Indenturedebtor]

4. Shocking

They picked the most economically "screw the people as usual" candidates.

Yet another point against. Might as well get a rec from Bush or Lieberpuke. NYT isn't Liberal. It just plays less of a facist market segment than the Post.

[emilyg]

5. Great.

[Lucinda]

6. Thanks for the link!

K&R

That was a very balanced endorsement - other than I feel they dismissed Edwards too easily. They expressed, in most cases, what I feel the strengths and weaknesses are of both Obama and Hillary.