Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Super Tuesday Won't Decide Nominations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RoveRage Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 08:27 PM
Original message
Super Tuesday Won't Decide Nominations
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080124/D8UC7RDO0.html

WASHINGTON (AP) - Don't look to crown any presidential nominees on Super Tuesday. The race for delegates is so close in both parties that it is mathematically impossible for any candidate to lock up the nomination on Feb. 5, according to an Associated Press analysis of the states in play that day.

"A lot of people were predicting that this presidential election on both sides was going to be this massive sprint that ended on Feb. 5," said Jenny Backus, a Democratic consultant who is not affiliated with any candidate. Now it's looking as if the primaries after Super Tuesday - including such big, delegate-rich states as Texas, Ohio and Pennsylvania - could grow in importance.

"Maybe some states were better off waiting," said Backus.

That doesn't mean Super Tuesday won't be super after all. Voters in more than 20 states will go to the polls on the biggest day of the primary campaign, and thousands of delegates will be at stake.

But it's possible Feb. 5 might not even produce clear front-runners.

Here's why:

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton leads the race for delegates to the Democratic National Convention this summer. She has 236, including separately chosen party and elected officials known as superdelegates, giving her a 100-delegate lead over Sen. Barack Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's fine by me.
The more states that actually have a part to play in this, the better, AFAIC.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoveRage Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I second that emotion!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ordinaryaveragegirl Donating Member (853 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'd like to see it come down to Denver.
And it's close enough that it could actually happen. Edwards has already pledged to stay in all the way until then, and I'd guess that Clinton and Obama feel the same at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC