Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My prediction: Kucinich voters will go to Edwards

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:57 PM
Original message
My prediction: Kucinich voters will go to Edwards
You heard it here first
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Some are, others are annoyed that people keep asking them about it
when their candidate just dropped out. So the response you will get to this will be a mixed bag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Depends on what Dennis may say about an endorsement
He could throw his support behind Obama (the way he did in Iowa).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. with or without endorsement, they will go to Edwards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. And you know this how?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
28. From my doorbelling in a caucus state where second choices are important
--I'd say about 2/3 will go to Edwards. Most of the rest to Obama, and a significant number out of presidential campaigning and back to issues and local stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. He said he won't endorse anyone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Not this one...
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electron_blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. So who will you vote for in the primaries? Or are you abstaining?
Or voting in Republican primaries instead? Just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
26. ...
:crazy: isn't it? I predict everyone will make up their own minds and they don't need anyone to predict who they will "go to".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Not me. I won't vote for any who didn't support Dennis when the MSM toyed with him.
It's about the democratic process, not any single candidate. Dennis would have fought for any other candidate who had been unfairly excluded.

It boggles me that the "big three" have allowed the networks to do this. It is stunning complicity with the very problems we desperately need to solve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. not me either, for that reason and many others
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 07:19 PM by GreenArrow
an aye vote on and co-sponsorship of IWR among them.
He's the last candidate running I'd vote for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Dennis fought hard when Gravel was excluded first, right?
Give me a break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I am honestly not aware of this- could you please provide a link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. He didn't. I was being sarcastic. Why hold the remaining 3 to a standard DK himself didn't meet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Oh great, thanks.
Dennis was both invited and then uninvited. No one did anything. Dennis would have if it had happened to them.

:/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. You can still write Kucinich in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Gravel's a big boy. He can fight his own battles.
And as far as the MSNBC debate, read this: http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3246

He was one of the top four candidates after Richardson dropped out, but then MSNBC moved the goalposts on him.

If Gravel wanted in the debates so bad, he could have fought for himself. He's a grown-up and can fight his own battles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. So is Kucinich. He doesn't need the big three to fight for him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. They weren't fighting for him. Did they mention him at the MSNBC debate?
I thought not.

Kucinich has done more fighting than all three of them combined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Peake said he or she would not vote for any of the Big 3 because they didn't fight for him
That is what led to this exchange. I didn't say they fought for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. I voted for DK in early primary voting
and will consider writing in his name in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. my observation: Most of them already have.
Been saying it a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. I already have
Dennis lost my ballot when he started talking about how Ron Paul would be a good running mate. Methinks Dennis should let the good doctor read that pocket constitution of his.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. This one will.
But I'm really sad that our BEST, TRUE candidate has withdrawn. :cry: The power of MSM is too great.

On NPR today when reporting his withdrawl, they still referred to the UFO bit (smearing for the future). Our media totally sux.
NPR used to be decent until * took control of it, too.

I'm hoping Dennis realizes that he can do more in his current position to maintain our democracy, than if he's out of pocket campaigning for Prez. He is a prudent individual.

Kucinich 2008 :dem:
Edwards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. I did that n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. In my circle, most of the Kucinich folks will be supporting Edwards.
The rest I think will sit the election out - which is pretty foolish imo.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xspowr Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
27. NYT: Edwards Open To Single-Payer System
Interesting NYT article on JRE's approach to reforming health care. This should provide some incentive for Kucinich supporters to give JRE their vote, and it bodes well for those who already supported JRE but who wanted to see single-payer on the table.

Link: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/25/us/politics/25edwards.html?pagewanted=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
29. Edwards has been my second choice for some time
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 03:12 AM by Kucinich4America
By default he's now my first. Doesn't mean I'm not uncomfortable with some of his past votes, or that I don't have genuine concerns that he will live up to the rhetoric that he's now preaching.

But I KNOW Hillary would never come close to doing so. And the more Obama opens his mouth (or is endorsed by right wing hardliners), the less I like him.

That leaves me either the option of Edwards, or sitting the entire thing out. But sitting out is not an option, when the most important thing of all, is preventing 4 more years of Bush-Clinton.

This is my choice. It wasn't dictated by Dennis, or his campaign, nor do I expect any other Kucitizens to follow my lead, though I imagine many of them will come to a similar conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
30. It would be hilarious if Kucinich endorsed Clinton...
...not bloody likely, I know, not at all.

But watching all of the heads exploding on DU would be amazing. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
31. Spit in a bucket.
His support level was so low it won't change anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC