Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton opponents should bring up the Rich pardon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:29 PM
Original message
Clinton opponents should bring up the Rich pardon
One of the most reprehensible decisons from the Clionton White House.

By freeing plankton like Rich, it was like one last middle finger to the progressive base they sold out time and time again. It sums up their time in power perfectly.

I'd love to see Bill and Hill spin their way out of that one. They've yet to ever explain what the hell that was about. It's indefensible.

And yes, it's fair game. She's running on her experience as a supposedly integral part of the administration, so she we can blame her for taking part in the bad as much as she takes credit for the good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. You just did. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Beat me to it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hillary Clinton is the one running for President. What does the Marc Richard pardon, a decision her
HUSBAND made, have to do with her?

She didn't make that decision. He did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. but she was her 35 years of experience then, wasn't she?
It's amazing how when you bring this up, suddenly we're told she had no input on WH decisons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. more lame crap from BHO's supporters!
IF you did care about her 35 years of service and dedication..you would'nt make blatantly idiotic statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Sure, Hillary knew nothing, NOTHING! - - >
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. If you have evidence that she was involved in deciding to pardon Marc Rich, post it. Otherwise,
STFU already!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. In case you are confused or don't remember or don't want to or have had more than your share of
Kool-Aid.... Bill was president! He made the decisions! Hillary didn't!

Hillary was totally involved in every decision that was made for 8 years! That makes her very knowledgeable and well informed and experienced. (Obama wasn't even into politics and up to snuff about what was going on in those years) BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN EVERYTHING HE VOTED FOR OR DID WAS APPROVED BY HILLARY! Do you think she approved of that BJ (now I'm getting in the gutter with you) and is to blame for that decision too? No, only when it's convenient for your chance to bad mouth Hillary.

By the way...do you approve of everything your spouse thinks or says?
Would you like to be held responsible if he committed a crime etc? I think not. They are two very commonly involved people...but two DIFFERENT people. Hillary has always been more liberal than Bill. You wait and see. Be patient!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Well, lt's hear her opinion of it then
Let's bring it up.
And what about Rich's ties to the Rodham family?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Hon, you can't have it both ways. He made all the decisions, but she
was totally involved in every decision, yet she knew nothing about Rich's pardon. Uh huh. Who's drinking the kool aid? :eyes: Did I touch a nerve, BTW?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hillary in the WH will ALWAYS remind everyone of Bill's philandering
so on that alone she will be hammered by the right and she should just stay in the Senate. I'm not in the mood for 4 to 8 more years of late-night Clenis jokes, and more Clinton-based hate-radio garbage. It sux thinking about it.

Edwards/Obama 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. ? - a tax calculation case over a method used by all in the industry with only Rich hit
with criminal charges - because he was a Dem.

I agree - we all should bring up the Rich case - it fits the pattern of the DA firings under W.

Rich should have had to pay a massive fine - the way the others were required to pay.

But Rich had not been cleared for the favorable accounting attempt by the CIA - he was an outsider in the oil industry.

Ya - this should be brought up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Rich is scum. This was hardly the first of his wrongdoing, either.
Look up sometime how he fucked over steelworkers in my home state of WVa in a little town called Ravenswood.

Of all the people Bill could have pardoned, this guy was deserving?

And then there's the matter of Hillary's family being tied to the guy.

Sure...she had nothing to do with any of this.
Why hasn't she ever commented on it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Scum" doesn't send you to jail - there was no reason for jail beyond being a Democrat - and
Since when is the scenario a new one

Kaiser had sold the facility to a privately held company, the Ravenswood Aluminum Corporation at a price that assumed the buyer would demanded wholesale changes to the labor contract, insisting upon lower labor costs, fewer seniority rights, and more labor flexibility.

Rich owning RAC actually helped the Steelworkers as they could embarrass customers and get them to stop buying product much more easily by pointing to Rich's evil tax evasion and his selling of oil to embargoed by the US countries via a subsidiary (again something all the oil companies were doing). It is great the Steelworkers won (I am a lapsed steel worker for US Steel's American Wire Works subsidiary and am strongly pro-union - but this is not about being pro or anti union).

Rich was sleaze - and it hurts to defend a sleazy billionaire - but if one is into fair treatment meaning same treatment for all, Rich got screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. Bush made Clinton pardon Rich
Rich is a crook
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Maybe Bush "fooled" them into doing it. Yeah- thats it. n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. We will hear all about this and every other Clinton scandal, real and imagined soon enough...
...if we are stupid enough to give her the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. better to bring them up now
The left is justified in being outraged. It will be faux shock from the right, who behave like the Clibntons on these matters ... but since they own the media, it will get played nonstop til November
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. It's not just "the left"- the moderates are having doubts too.
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 10:31 PM by Dr Fate
The non-DEM moderates, centrists, swing-voters and Bush fatigued Republicans are not going to put Hillary over the top in the general. Her perceived baggage is only one of the problems.

The perception, right or wrong of her being "corrupt" and invloved in various scandals is too easy for the GOP to play on- and the media will gleefully oblige.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheozone Donating Member (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. Can we talk about the Scooter nonparden parden while we are at it? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. The one Hillary's righthand man, James Carville pushed for?
Sounds like a good topic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. and incidentally, Libby was Rich's attorney
some great people these Clintons hang out with

A vote for Hillary is a nomination for four more years of Matalin/Carville clients
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
22. KNPnta
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
24. dumbdumbdumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
25. Obama and Edwards should do just that at the next debate...Senator Clinton will kick their butts...
SHE'S the one running...regardless of what that mealy~mouthed slacker Obama may say...NOT BILL CLINTON. The candidate who runs against Bill Clinton's Presidency will be stamped as a fool and a whine~y ass worm. Obama's already whimpering about how the big mean man Clinton has been to him, let's see how well that plays. Just imagine what they would do to Obama if he made it to the primary. McCain would wipe the floor with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. While some of you have decided to bring up the matter of a pardon issued by a ...
former president, why have you not brought up the pardons issued by Daddy Bush for the criminals--real criminals by the way--of Iran Contra?

Any of you mudsuckers have an answer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. then, while they're at it, bring up the Bush-Clinton connections in Iran-Contra n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Actually, I hear about Bill Clinton giving Bush Sr. a pass on all those things all the time.
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 10:33 PM by Dr Fate
But in any event, why does bringing up what a Bush Sr. did have any relavance concerning the primaries or the general?

We attack Bush and talk about the crimes of the Bush family all the time. In fact, we want him impeached.

In case any of the "mudsuckers" on this thread didnt know it, "Bush did it too" isnt exactly the best defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC