Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama on Dodd's filibuster

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:04 PM
Original message
Obama on Dodd's filibuster
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 12:15 PM by ProSense

Obama Joins Dodd Filibuster of FISA Telecom Amnesty

By Big Tent Democrat, Section Elections 2008
Posted on Tue Oct 23, 2007

Senator Obama has serious concerns about many provisions in this bill, especially the provision on giving retroactive immunity to the telephone companies. He is hopeful that this bill can be improved by the Senate Judiciary Committee. But if the bill comes to the Senate floor in its current form, he would support a filibuster of it.

Obama steps up. Senator Clinton?

link


Obama’s Statement on Dodd and Filibuster

By: Jane Hamsher Monday December 17

I contacted the Clinton, Edwards and Obama campaigns last night to ask them if they had statements on Dodd's filibuster against retroactive immunity today. So far the only one to get back to me with one is Obama:

Senator Obama unequivocally opposes giving retroactive immunity to telecommunications companies and has cosponsored Senator Dodd's efforts to remove that provision from the FISA bill. Granting such immunity undermines the constitutional protections Americans trust the Congress to protect. Senator Obama supports a filibuster of this bill, and strongly urges others to do the same. It's not clear whether he can return for the vote, but under the Senate rules, the side trying to end a filibuster must produce 60 votes to cut off debate. Whether he is present for the vote for not, Senator Obama will not be among those voting to end the filibuster."

Both the Edwards and Clinton campaigns said they are working on statements.

more


Edwards on Dodd's filibuster



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great.
where does Hillary stand ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The last line of the post said...
both Hillary and Edwards were preparing their statements. I don't think it should much matter who got the statement out first, it isn't a horse race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Why
is this being posted when it was over a month ago?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. A lot of things posted here are FYI and for clarification. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. It's about the potential CURRENT filibuster. In fact, they're on the floor NOW. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. October 23rd 2007 Hillary said she would support the filibuster
Hillary haters are merely trying to make her look bad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. "Hillary haters are merely trying to make her look bad" Really?
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 12:38 PM by ProSense
How, by posting that Obama supports it?

You're free to start a thread on Hillary, here's the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. You left in quotes putting doubts as to her position.
You went to the trouble to find out Edward's position.

Very dishonest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. "You went to the trouble to find out Edward's position. Very dishonest."
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 01:08 PM by ProSense
Maybe I was making a point that had nothing to do with Hillary.

Now, stop whining and go start that Hillary thread!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. So why include this line "Obama steps up. Senator Clinton?" in the first blurb?
And you'll notice other posters got the false impression you were shooting for.

Now I get to show them how dishonest you are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Ask the author of the piece. My thinking is that it was written before Hillary issued her statement.
Obama and Clinton.

What do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Yes and that author later gave this update
http://www.talkleft.com/story/2007/10/23/211938/22

So why did you leave the impression that Hillary was nowhere to be found on this issue?

If it was just about Obama, why did you include the Edwards link?

Well at least now you've been exposed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Here, to save you (and me) from a circular (and needlessly lengthy) discussion, let me direct you to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Will he fly back to help in the fillibuster?
Or is campaigning more important?

Same goes for Hillary. Strongly worded statements and press releases aren't enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Good question. Last time around I think it was only Dodd up there fighting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. Agreed.
Being there is more important than press releases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. K & R. Good for Obama. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kudos to Obama and Edwards for supporting Dodd on filibuster
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 01:40 PM by avaistheone1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. What does this mean?
"Whether he is present for the vote for not, Senator Obama will not be among those voting to end the filibuster."

Are they able to vote in absentia?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. no, they just have to not vote for cloture.
sort of like voting present when your friends ask you to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Thanks, and....
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. i dunno, but
nancy is a great progressive, and a former chicagoan. like mike malloy, she was sent packing from chicago talk radio for her refusal to buckle. she is someone who has the nerve to run in michigan on a platform of protecting the environment, and getting the us carmakers off their gas guzzling asses.
she ran for senate before she left chicago, but had the bad timing to run in a crowded primary against BO. our loss is michigans gain, i hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. OT -- Did Randi Rhodes get the number of on-line votes for Nancy Skinner
that she wanted yesterday? I voted (although I shamefully admit I don't know who Nancy is.)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. Yes! Where is Hill on this? Time to step up - Proud of Dodd & Obama!
:applause: Let's go all the way!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Hillary supported Dodd's filibuster the same day as Obama
Q: Can you discuss your position on the reauthorization of the FISA bill?

HRC: I am troubled by the concerns that have been raised by the recent legislation reported out of the Intelligence Committee. I haven't seen it so I can't express an opinion about it. But I don't trust the Bush Administration with our civil rights and liberties. So I'm going to study it very hard. As matters stand now, I could not support it and I would support a filibuster absent additional information coming forward that would convince me differently.

http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2007/10/hillary_says_she_would_support_filibuster_of_current_bill.php

The OP deliberately left that out to create a false impression.

I am sorry you had to deal with disinfo.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
24. Yep, so can we ease down on the " Reaganite" thing. Fair nuff was Edwards first though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
25. Tue Oct 23, 2007 is the date for Obama.
telling for the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Oct 23rd is also the date for Hillary Clinton
Its omission is telling about the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC